Not exact matches
However, the common core deliberately leaves out specific
instructional strategies to help students meet those standards, and researchers say they will have to hustle to develop best
practices for teachers.
In his acclaimed Readicide (2009), high school English
teacher Kelly Gallagher argued that the «inane, mind - numbing»
instructional practices found in today's schools are partly to blame
for students» lack of interest in reading.
For students to embrace the skills needed in a changing technology landscape,
teachers must coordinate knowledge,
instructional practices, and technologies to positively influence academic achievement.
• Make it a «non-negotiable» • Recruit and hire
teachers who buy - in from the get - go • Provide them with hands - on professional development and plenty of examples • Share and celebrate «best
practices» • Identify
teachers who do it well and have others visit their classrooms • Give
instructional teams time to collaborate and to develop quality prompts • Stockpile successful A.R.T. plans and incorporate them into the school's curriculum map • Hire and / or bring in
practicing artists to participate • And, most importantly, get excited - as though you had just seen a narwhal tusk
for the first time!
These outcomes may also result from the specific ways in which schools and
teachers have adjusted their
instructional practices, perhaps differently
for mathematics and reading.
«When
teachers engage in high - level
instructional talk and have the opportunity to improve
practice collaboratively and in concrete forms, they develop team loyalty, trust, and feelings of responsibility and accountability
for each other and
for all the team's students.
• Classrooms open to
teacher colleagues
for observation and analysis In order to articulate a problem of
practice teachers must make use of
instructional data which they collect through observations of their colleagues» classrooms and contrast current
practice with their shared expectation of effective instruction
for the identified learning problem.
One is the lesser profile accorded to curriculum and
instructional practice and to what happens once the
teacher closes the classroom door; another is the view that random assignment is premature, given its dependence on expert school management and high - quality program implementation; and another is the view that quantitative techniques have only marginal usefulness
for understanding schools, since a school's governance, culture, and management are best understood through intensive case studies.
The 3 - hour time period provides an opportunity
for professional discourse, during which
teachers can learn from one another, learn from examining student work, and discuss best paths
for instructional practice.»
But edtech innovations hold real promise
for improving student learning outcomes if education leaders use them to redesign classroom and school models in ways that transform
teachers»
instructional practices.
He makes similar arguments about how efforts to improve
teacher quality,
instructional approaches like Success
for All, and high - expectation techniques
practiced by educators like Jaime Escalante and Rafe Esquith are not promising models
for reform because their success is due to the selection of students or other factors that can not be replicated on a broader scale.
In the largest study of
instructional practice ever undertaken, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project is searching
for tools to save the world from perfunctory
teacher evaluations.
The good news is that at the end of the first year, statistically significant positive effects were found
for teacher knowledge and
for one of three
instructional practices.
If, however,
teachers must choose a smaller number of
practices on which to focus their improvement efforts (
for example, because of limited time or professional development opportunities), our results suggest that math achievement would likely benefit most from improvements in classroom management skills before turning to
instructional issues.
The Power of
Teacher Rounds: A Guide for Facilitators, Principals, & Department Chairs Katherine Boles and Vivian Troen The practice of instructional teacher rounds — a process inspired by hospital rounds — is a design for professional learning that promotes teacher collaboration by making teacher practice
Teacher Rounds: A Guide
for Facilitators, Principals, & Department Chairs Katherine Boles and Vivian Troen The
practice of
instructional teacher rounds — a process inspired by hospital rounds — is a design for professional learning that promotes teacher collaboration by making teacher practice
teacher rounds — a process inspired by hospital rounds — is a design
for professional learning that promotes
teacher collaboration by making teacher practice
teacher collaboration by making
teacher practice
teacher practice public.
To provide the best
instructional practices for ELLs, a
teacher must be willing to accommodate their learning needs and provide them with equitable learning opportunities.
The study found it is important
for prekindergarten
teachers to adopt a child - centered
instructional approach rather than an academically directed approach or a combination of academic and child - centered
practices.
And while Khan Academy's prominence engenders fear of standardization and deprofessionalization among some critics, Bergmann, Sams, and Smith see
instructional videos as powerful tools
for teachers to create content, share resources, and improve
practice.
In Kelly School, which is discussed in the book, these characteristics were built through a set of interrelated organizational routines including close monitoring of each student's academic progress, an explicit link between students» outcomes and
teachers»
practices, weekly 90 - minute professional development meetings focused on
instructional improvement, and the cultivation of a formal and informal discourse emphasizing high expectations, cultural responsiveness, and
teachers» responsibility
for student learning.
The district nonetheless moved forward with the pilot to implement formative, ongoing assessments
for teachers that would provide them with structured feedback on their
instructional practices.
Therefore, ILTs provide a place
for discussion but ultimately leave team members unable to truly capitalize and make decisions that would positively impact
teacher instructional practice.
Answers to these and other questions will shed light on how
teacher evaluation systems might improve
instructional practice as well as their implications
for the
teacher labor market.
By
instructional leadership, we mean the principal's capacity to: 1) offer a vision
for instruction that will inspire the faculty; 2) analyze student performance data and make sound judgments as to which areas of the curriculum need attention; 3) make good judgments about the quality of the teaching in a classroom based on analysis of student work; 4) recognize the elements of sound standards - based classroom organization and
practice; 5) provide strong coaching to
teachers on all of the foregoing; 6) evaluate whether
instructional systems in the school are properly aligned; and 7) determine the quality and fitness of
instructional materials.
She is particularly interested in the development of a common language
for studying and teaching
instructional practice and on identifying resources that support
practice - focused
teacher training.
First, these findings suggest that future studies examine the role that psychological safety — that is, the ability to speak up and ask
for help — plays in creating positive conditions
for teachers to improve their
instructional practice.
Across all
instructional formats, it's important
for teachers to provide explicit instruction of unfamiliar words, to recycle words continually so students have the opportunity to
practice, and to expose students to words using multiple formats.
In this context, a highly effective organizational learning environment is one in which
teachers engage in learning behaviors such as speaking up, asking
for help, admitting errors, and trying out new ideas that incorporate new knowledge to change their
instructional practice.
For too long our professional development systems have focused on the quality of the professional development «inputs» provided to
teachers to improve their professional
practice, with unfortunately little evidence of improvement or linkage to any «outputs» of a change in
instructional practice.
Insight ADVANCE, the company behind the observation and coaching platform used in schools and
teacher preparation programs, invited me to develop an ebook that explores research, tools, principles, and best
practices for providing inservice
teachers feedback on their
instructional performance.
This comprehensive software, developed in partnership with Harris School Solutions, makes it easy
for teachers, coaches, and school leaders to work together to improve the use of
instructional strategies and other professional
practices.
The lawsuit alleges SED's failure to appropriately compensate
for student poverty when calculating student growth scores resulted in about 35 percent of Syracuse
teachers receiving overall ratings of «developing» or «ineffective» in 2012 - 13, even though 98 percent were rated «highly effective» or «effective» by their principals on the 60 points tied to their
instructional classroom
practices.
Teachers in the same school are strategically paired based on complementary strengths and areas
for growth on specific
instructional practice areas.
It's not all about test - taking, but it is important
for teachers to measure student progress frequently in order to inform their own
instructional practice.
By reviewing what is in place
for PD at the district and building level, district leaders have an opportunity to make adjustments and add supports to ensure that the professional development provided to
teachers results in improved
instructional practices and increased student achievement.
Annual
teacher surveys between 2010 and 2013 asked
teachers about the frequency of visiting another
teacher's classroom to watch him or her teach; having a colleague observe their classroom; inviting someone in to help their class; going to a colleague to get advice about an
instructional challenge they faced; receiving useful suggestions
for curriculum material from colleagues; receiving meaningful feedback on their teaching
practice from colleagues; receiving meaningful feedback on their teaching
practice from their principal; and receiving meaningful feedback on their teaching
practice from another school leader (e.g., AP,
instructional coach).
In particular, rich data on SIG schools in one of the studies shows that schools improved both by differentially retaining their most experienced
teachers and by providing
teachers with increased supports
for instructional improvement such as opportunities to visit each other's classrooms and to receive meaningful feedback on their teaching
practice from school leaders.
As with the sub-study reported in Section 1.4, this sub-study focuses on evidence about
practices for successful
instructional leadership as judged by educators close to the students — principals and
teachers.
Most obviously, if
teacher educators hold transformative aims and seek to promote new
instructional practices and social ideas that are not widely available
for observation in schools, then cases might constitute one bridge between hortatory pronouncements and new
practices and attitudes.
To illustrate, the Milken Educator Award, given in the United States, identifies and selects outstanding elementary and secondary school
teachers «as evidenced by effective
instructional practices and student learning results in the classroom and school» or as evidenced by «accomplishments beyond the classroom that provide models of excellence
for the profession» (Milken Family Foundation, n.d.).
They propose an alternative model, dubbed Teaching
for Better Learning, which attempts to account
for the complex contextual features that
teachers face and that significantly shape the identification of student needs and
instructional practices.
To get a picture of their
instructional practices, we observed each
teacher for an hour of reading instruction each month from December through April.
Evidence collected
for this component also highlights certain differences, by school level and by level of
teachers «
instructional expertise, in the values participants assign to the core
practices.
The framework
for our overall project also points to the mostly indirect influence of principals «actions on students and on student learning.223 Such actions are mediated,
for example, by school conditions such as academic press, 224 with significant consequences
for teaching and learning and
for powerful features of classroom
practice such as
teachers «uses of
instructional time.225 Evidence - informed decision making by principals, guided by this understanding of principals «work, includes having and using a broad array of evidence about many things: key features of their school «s external context; the status of school and classroom conditions mediating leaders «own leadership
practices; and the status of their students «learning.
In particular, they emphasize the context - specific nature of teaching and the need
for teachers to integrate knowledge of subject matter, students, and contextual conditions as they make
instructional decisions, engage students in learning, and reflect on
practice (Wayne & Youngs, 2003).
These opportunities present another challenge
for teacher educators: preparing
teachers to make effective use of the online medium in their own
instructional practice.
Curriculum provides the organization and structure
for that which is to be learned, so that the
instructional and assessment
practices of
teachers facilitate student mastery of the essential learnings.
Do three specific attributes of principals «leadership behavior — the sharing of leadership with
teachers, the development of trust relationships among professionals, and the provision of support
for instructional improvement — affect
teachers «work with each other and their classroom
practices?
The implications of
teacher empowerment
for instructional practice and student academic performance.
Do three specific attributes of principals «leadership behavior — the sharing of leadership with
teachers, the development of trust relationships among professionals, and the provision of support
for instructional improvement — affect
teachers «work with one another, and their classroom
practices?
Access toolkits
for teachers with research - based
instructional practices and strategies in reading, writing, math, and cognitive science / advanced reasoning.