In 1925, Tennessee schoolteacher John Scopes was indicted
for teaching evolution against state law.
In 1925, biology teacher John Scopes was tried
for teaching evolution in the public classroom...
John Glenn, by the way, puts in a good word
for teaching evolution in schools.
The National Science Foundation, the National Academy of Sciences, and other groups have increased research investment on identifying essential concepts
for teaching evolution, including creating the Evolution Education Research Centre, a partnership of Harvard, McGill, and Chapman universities, and launching the...
Then suddenly he asked: «Why don't I have you arrested
for teaching evolution from that text and bring the whole thing to an end?»
One problem, the researchers say: breaking the «cycle of ignorance,» in which teaching students lack good role models
for teaching evolution because they weren't taught the subject well in high school or college.
The biology teacher, Scopes, whose trial
for teaching evolution played so dramatic a role, was an active Methodist supported by fellow church members rather than an anti-Christian scientist.
I've wrestled with a lot of questions related to science and faith, especially given my location a mere two miles from the famous Rhea County Courthouse where John Scopes was prosecuted
for teaching evolution in a public school.
When I was a teenager, my family moved to Dayton, Tennessee, a town famous for prosecuting and convicting a science professor
for teaching evolution in 1925, and which sits right on the path of the old Trail of Tears.
Not exact matches
The National Center
for Science Education, which supports the
teaching of
evolution in public education, is closely monitoring the case.
But rather than incentivize
teaching innovation that would allow science educators to discuss religion and ethics ---
for example, creationism in light of
evolution and vice versa, or the scientific and ethical implications of stem cells and in vitro fertilization — many teachers are afraid to even mention these issues, despite their importance,
for fear of losing their jobs.
(i) a woman's right to choose; (ii)
teaching evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» by theists (vii) basic $ ex education
for older school children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.
And
for the record
teaching evolution is
teaching a theory and does not necessarily contradict the concept of creationism.
@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving
taught beside
Evolution in science class as a possible explanation
for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls
for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs
Sad when people want lies like a «young earth» and that «
evolution is a myth» or that «some god caused» the big bang
taught to their children in their schools, paid
for by their tax dollars.
For one thing
Evolution is not proven... It is still considered a theory... It should be removed because it is not science but only a theory...
Evolution is the stupidest thing
taught today and should be removed...
actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process
for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were
taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated
evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang
Evolution is
taught in school as it should — but other theories should at least be mentioned as well to open a dialogue and inspire kids to think
for themselves.
Evolution was not correctly
taught if you believe that it is a belief or a mere theory in the colloquial sense, that it unnecessarily complicates the world, and that understanding how organisms change over time is not crucial
for environmental policy, agriculture and biomedical research.
Those who still cling to pre-scientific religious fictions, ignoring the truths discovered through modern science, should at least take notice when the biology department at the world's most prominent Baptist university, where a statement of faith is a prerequisite
for teaching, unequivocally support
evolution through the following statement, which you can look up on their web site:
John Scopes, a high school science teacher, was tried
for violating a Tennessee law that prohibited the
teaching of
evolution.
If religion and
evolution were
taught to children until the age of 18 by an unbiased person and let people decide
for themselfs, I wonder how many religious people there would be.
Gods will is
for us humans today to evolved to a level of conciousness that will prepare us
for the challenges of our future survival, Scientists now predicts of hardships in the future due to over population and changes to the natural environment.and that is happening now with activists through out the world are reminding us of protecting nature.That is why we need a phsychological revolution to hasten the
evolution of consciousness that will address the problems.Ideological and philosophical enlightenment had the past great minds to develop ideas and belief because God sent them to reality in their times.Abraham, Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha, and many other religious leaders to
teach humanity the doctrines that God willed to be appropriate and applicable in those periods of their existence, Also great philosophers in another dimension of social involvement were born to interprete and connect philosophically as the second element of our conscience, Kant, Marx and countless of them also were born.To complete the triangular structure or dimension of our conscience is knowledge.
I have always doubted whether he was really a Christian or not, because he went to a secular university
for his education, where they
taught him
evolution.
E.g., in regards to scientific support
for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the
teaching of creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.
Evolution is not good
for our children - it
teaches them that they are no more than monkey - brains, when in truth, each one was lovingly constructed by a God Who needs each individual
for HIS purpose, not yours.
For what received more publicity than the booklets was the infamous American trial in 1925 when a school teacher, John Scopes, was tried and convicted for teaching biological evolution in a Tennessee scho
For what received more publicity than the booklets was the infamous American trial in 1925 when a school teacher, John Scopes, was tried and convicted
for teaching biological evolution in a Tennessee scho
for teaching biological
evolution in a Tennessee school.
For example, during the controversies about
evolution, some Christians insisted that only the view now called creationist could be
taught in departments of biology in their schools.
If you search the Coursera website on «
evolution», you will see that «Evolution: A Course for Educators» taught by instructors from the American Museum of Natural History» and «Genes and the Human Condition (From Behavior to Biotechnology)» taught by professors at the University of Maryland both start
evolution», you will see that «
Evolution: A Course for Educators» taught by instructors from the American Museum of Natural History» and «Genes and the Human Condition (From Behavior to Biotechnology)» taught by professors at the University of Maryland both start
Evolution: A Course
for Educators»
taught by instructors from the American Museum of Natural History» and «Genes and the Human Condition (From Behavior to Biotechnology)»
taught by professors at the University of Maryland both start in June.
Perhaps your claim is true, but like the big bang and the notion that
evolution is a means to species, there is no place in our public schools
for teaching religion as science.
And the RCC
teaches that
evolution is not a valid theory
for humans.
The exposition of the official
teaching of the Church leaves open, of course, many questions which urgently call
for an answer if the fundamental problem of the relation between a theology of Revelation and scientific theories of
evolution is to be cleared up.
I think it's important
for Christian colleges to transition into
teaching evolution (both micro and macro, if you make a distinction)
for a few reasons:
So my dad just returned from the International Forum on Higher Education
for the Council
for Christian Colleges & Universities held in Atlanta, where the hot topic of the week was
teaching evolution in Christian colleges.Francis Collins, author of The Language of God and founder of theBioLogos Foundation, spoke at the conference, urging professors and administrators to beware of placing students in the position of having to choose between their intellectual integrity and their faith.
Given that
evolution is forced to be
taught in classrooms, with no proof, I guess I can't see how anyone would leave God,
for nothing, especially when they're forced to believe it.
The programs
taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many
evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask
for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking
for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen
for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish
for help because now I am in the position to assist.
Even if all scientists declared
evolution to be entirely errant, creationism could be
taught as a science only in terms of what it denies, namely, that there is sufficient evidence
for evolution.
You are exhibit A
for why we need to
teach evolution to our children — if we don't they might end up with your poor understanding of science.
The task,
for example, of grafting the history of salvation onto to the phylogenetic tree of human
evolution does not belong to the
teaching office of the Church.
Generis: «
For these reasons the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics adde
For these reasons the
Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of
evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter -
for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics adde
for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics added].
One of the resons I thought there would be a higher percentage of atheisim is that
evolution is being
taught as fact in schools, but apparently most of the kids are not buying it, they just answer the questions on exams
for the best grades.
I don't believe in
evolution,
for example, and don't want them being lied to and
taught it as fact.
I do believe
evolution should be
taught in schools but in a way that allows
for reasonable dissent by those who disagree.
For this reason I have realized this: a chimpanzee does not understand math (regardless of how many hours I spent trying to
teach them this) because of it's anatomy, yet I do understand math because of my anatomy (and education of course), I as a mere mortal (unlike yourself) know that my faculties must be somehow limited and that there are concepts that no matter how much I try to use my retarded brain I will never understand them because I don't have the god lobe in the ole brain like you do, none the less I keep on thinkin» in a finite fashion hoping that my future children might have a little more range than I since they too will be a «tarded snapshot in a timeline of cognitive
evolution.
For the past 30 years, the «equal - time argument» --- the idea that Creationism taught alongside evolution --- has been popular method for Creationists to advance their cau
For the past 30 years, the «equal - time argument» --- the idea that Creationism
taught alongside
evolution --- has been popular method
for Creationists to advance their cau
for Creationists to advance their cause.
According to Edward J. Larson's scholarly, informative, Pulitzer Prize - winning book, Summer
for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion, the prosecution of young John Scopes
for presumedly violating a state law restricting the
teaching of
evolution in the public schools need not have resulted in the now legendary high - pitched standoff between the atheistic radical Clarence Darrow and the robustly religious populist William Jennings Bryan.
Finally, he objected to the
teaching of
evolution, especially with regard to the origin of man, because he felt that it led to the rise of ugly ideas like eugenics and social Darwinism, and furthermore discouraged any hope
for the progress of mankind.
I simply have an education
for the public school system which
taught me that
evolution was fact, but I was skeptical and still am.
We did have to take home a flier and have our parents sign it stating that is was ok
for us to learn
evolution the correct way
taught by our teacher who by the way won all kinds of awards
for being an outstanding teacher.
Many scientists believe in both god AND
evolution, like Ken Miller, biology professor, textbook author, and key trial
for the
teaching of
evolution in the Dover trial... who is also a devout and practicing Catholic.