Sentences with phrase «for teaching problem»

This article discusses current knowledge about teaching problem solving to students with a learning disability (LD), using computers for teaching math to students with LD, and using computers for teaching problem solving to at - risk students and students with learning problems.

This resource is perfect for teaching problem solving style algebra questions (e.g. suited to the new style 1 - 9 GCSE questions).

Not exact matches

And teach them to look for any additional problems they can solve.

When it comes to blood tests, which is what Cuban referred to specifically, Dr. Aaron E. Carroll explains at The Incidental Economist that at the Indiana University School of Medicine, he teaches «residents and medical students never, ever to order blood tests unless they are looking for a specific problem.»

They suggested more courses were needed to teach graduates to effectively manage individuals and team - driven organizations, provide tools for problem solving and provide better grounding in theory.

More importantly, teaching class gave me a chance to help serve as a positive influence for the clients that were leaving their own problems, issues, and concerns at the door.

No problem for Jesus it was where the disciples said it is better not to be married and Jesus said he who can accept this teaching should do it.

As if it wasn't bad enough for man to try to run his affairs independently of God and His standards, it has been made even worse by religion teaching us that all our problems are actually blessings from God.

God's reason for this Testament is to fix the problem of one bible, yet hundreds of Christian churches on earth teaching their own version of that one bible.

Rather, the new NIV here makes it possible for English readers to discover a more Catholic or Orthodox or truly Lutheran Paul, one who teaches that the problem with the Jewish law is its ethnic and temporary character and that human salvation concerns our real sacramental participation in divine life, real transformation, and ultimate resurrection.

I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe more of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as much problems as we do.

atheism teaches people to think for themselves and to not blame some mythical devil for their problems.

For the Indian scriptural tradition, although there is no explicit literary teaching as to whether or not brahman is dynamic, there is the affirmation that it is the key to the problem of the one and the many.

The problem with the evangelical purity culture, as I see it, isn't that it teaches saving sex for marriage, but that it equates virginity with sexual wholeness and therefore as something that can be lost or given or taken away in a single moment.

In fact, I have tried to keep silent on certain issues over the years, but the problem, or maybe I should say the benefit, of teaching through books of the Bible the way I do, is that I can not avoid certain issues for long.

The occasion for the teaching is a problem for Jesus by the Pharisees, who ask him if it is lawful under any circumstances for a man to divorce wife.

Biblicism falls apart, Smith says, because of the «the problem of pervasive interpretive pluralism,» for «even among presumably well - intentioned readers — including many evangelical biblicists — the Bible, after their very best efforts to understand it, says and teaches very different things about most significant topics... It becomes beside the point to assert a text to be solely authoritative or inerrant, for instance, when, lo and behold, it gives rise to a host of many divergent teachings on important matters.»

For all that the Orthodox have taught or retaught Protestants, there are potential problems in this rediscovery of Orthodoxy.

The discrepancy between the orthodox teaching of an eternity of punishment for those predestined to damnation and the belief in God's love is one of the too rarely examined problems in traditional Christian doctrine.

Islamic terrorism will be a problem for many years and until the muslims reject the teachings in the Quran that justify the killing of infidels, the fight will go on.

Among the criteria used for selecting parishes: evidence of a joyful congregational spirit; innovative, thoughtful worship; scripture - based teaching and preaching; emphasis on a deep relationship with God; and attempts to boldly confront problems within the membership and the community.

Throughout the process of teaching and learning, we should acknowledge completed steps by our students, give them a feeling of accomplishment for having grasped the point, solved the problem, parsed the sentence correctly, rendered the accents properly, and so on.

The young evangelical approaches the problem like this: «Feminism [for example] is true; the Bible teaches the truth; therefore the Bible must teach feminism.»

Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.

For the most part I was not raised in the orthodox christian church so that doctrine was never much of a problem for me but it is standard teaching for the Baptist, Penetecostals ect.For the most part I was not raised in the orthodox christian church so that doctrine was never much of a problem for me but it is standard teaching for the Baptist, Penetecostals ect.for me but it is standard teaching for the Baptist, Penetecostals ect.for the Baptist, Penetecostals ect....

The problem is that Christians and Muslims have been kept apart for the past 1,300 years because they were taught that there are irreconcilable differences between the Bible and the Qur» an.

To support his slurs, Eichenwald first tries to undermine reliance on Scripture as a supreme authority for moral discernment and then to show how Christians, oblivious to the problems with biblical inspiration, ignore its clear teaching.

Failure in love and life is a requisite for success in teaching, and the problems of TV teachers are solved by leaving their profession — not by towns raising taxes, building schools, or giving higher salaries.

All these scriptures / Biblical teachings created a problem for me as over the years when I would experience psychotic symptoms and psychic phenomena as a result of intense / deep prayer and meditation, I actually thought that God was trying to show me a sign or tell me something or he was leading me in a particular direction.

I remember movies like Fever Pitch, Serendipity and literally hundreds more teaching me that all my problems would be solved once I met the right girl, fell head over heels in love, hit a rough patch where we didn't talk for a minute and then came rushing back together to live indefinitely in a state of heavenly bliss.

Furthermore, this gap in the teaching, this disregard for concrete realities, poses an enormous problem for those who would like to render themselves useful to economic and social actors.

The CENTURY addressed other personal sins and moral failings, regularly speaking to the problems caused by lax divorce laws, and occasionally writing about the evils of gambling, tobacco, and the «sex consciousness» that would accompany the «vociferous demand for the teaching of sex hygiene» in public schools.

But if a Calvinist takes the alternate opinion, along with Hoekema, and says that Romans 7 describes the condition and experience of the unbeliever, then this text creates problems for their teachings on total inability.

The exposition of the official teaching of the Church leaves open, of course, many questions which urgently call for an answer if the fundamental problem of the relation between a theology of Revelation and scientific theories of evolution is to be cleared up.

Original Sin then - that overlooked but vital doctrine of the reality of our state, and the introduction into the material universe for the first time of «the problem of evil» - teaches the rupturing of that living, holy communion of good by which, from the first pair, men were to minister life and fulfilment to one another through Christ.

Anthony Esolen, writing in the Foreword, states the nature of the problem: «We do not know what or how to teach children because we do not know what a child is, and we do not know what a child is because we do not know what man is - and Him from whom and for whom man is.»

Problems arise only when a desire to teach becomes stronger than a desire to learn; when we give up sharing for proselytizing.

This is a fact of great theological significance, and this significance will concern us in our last chapter, but it is also the reason for our major problem in reconstructing the teaching of Jesus: we do distinguish between those two figures and when we say «the teaching of Jesus» we mean the teaching of the earthly Jesus, as the early Church did not.

Your article, post, whatever it is (I'm new to this kind of thing) gave me some of the answers I was looking for and helped me find the problems with the biblical logic I was taught.

I use it to teach my kids that they need to think for themselves, that they need to solve their own problems, that they should not rely on other people to think or act for them.

Yet these are problems with which we must wrestle, for unless we are prepared to do justice to the categories of the first century in our interpretation, we are not going to reach the historical Jesus and his teaching.

I don't know if the problem is tithing so much as being able to teach people to be leaders and take responsibility for the community God has put them in.

The majority of religions today teach that for one, God is the ruler of this world and that he «works in mysterious ways» and therefore the problems we see today are simply by - product.

The REAL problem (for when we are good and ready to finally come to grips with it) is the church's grossly incorrect teachings on 1.

For starters we need to question the modern faith that teaches us to view the world as a problem to be solved through scientific knowledge and technological innovation.

Leo's teaching brilliantly balances the human and divine natures existing within the one divine person in Christ without mixing, separating or diminishing the integrity of the natures, but the problem for biblical theologians lies in Leo's use of non-scriptural terminology, most notably «person» itself.

For many years I taught an introductory theology course for undergraduates titled «The Problem of God.&raqFor many years I taught an introductory theology course for undergraduates titled «The Problem of God.&raqfor undergraduates titled «The Problem of God.»

And in terms of se - xual problems, it is easy to understand why Rachel might have questioned whether she was attractive enough for her husband if he was turning elsewhere for his pleasure in light of the fact that they were both taught that the only pleasure they are going to have after marriage is from each other.

The term «Christ,» on the other hand, makes it clear that the problem that he is dealing with is the teachings of Christianity, especially with respect to what various groups have meant by «following Christ,» For the same reason, I think, he deals primarily with leading Christian theologians, rather than with denominations or historical movements.

Now gnosticism is a religion which takes the need for salvation seriously, and it presented a real problem to Christians, for much of its teaching seemed to parallel the Christian.