Sentences with phrase «for teaching this history»

Suffice it to say with regard to the special topic of this paper that certain requirements for teaching the history of religions to - day follow from the brief analysis of the situation which we have essayed here.

He was at a meeting discussing the best curriculum for teaching history.

And in addition to the opportunities for science lessons, the parks can also be great resources for teaching history and, for that matter, the importance and pleasure of individual and group physical activity.

A key principle for teaching history is to help your class raise questions, and make sure they back up their ideas with evidence.

I strive to convey a similar passion for teaching history.

Included: Tips for teaching history.

These interviews reveal great potential for teachers to use DocSouth in their classrooms since both they and their students have the requisite technology skills, teachers already use the Internet to plan instruction and for research, and most importantly, part of their perceived goal for teaching history is to present multiple perspectives.

Building a history curriculum: Guidelines for teaching history in schools.

REA explored teachers» usage of project resources, classroom implementation of new strategies for teaching history, district - level curriculum and instruction changes, and changes in students» interest in history and historical thinking, using surveys, interviews, case studies, and online activities.

Not exact matches

As Microsoft's Steve Ballmer took to the stage for an announcement a few weeks ago, many tech onlookers felt like fans at a Maple Leafs hockey game: history had taught them to keep their expectations low.

Discussing the complacency and complicity of traditional economic models, as taught in universities and adopted by central banks, Michael and Steve take us on a journey from a solar system to a galaxy of thought, taking in the history of economics to solutions for the ongoing global depression.

If the speculative bubbles and crashes across market history have taught us anything (particularly the repeated episodes of recklessness we've observed over the past two decades), it's this: regardless of the level of valuation at any point in time, we have to allow for the potential for investors to adopt a psychological preference toward risk - seeking speculation, and no amount of reason will dissuade them even when that speculation has already made a collapse inevitable over a longer horizon.

Relative to investing, we value investors look to identify equities selling for prices well below our estimate of their intrinsic value because history has taught us that the prices of these securities will converge toward their true worth.

Of course, as history teaches us, in such situation regulators would probably blame «inherently unstable» banks — or capitalism — for not holding enough liquidity and not having a stable - enough deposit base in the first place.

The Intelligent Investor teaches you about the fundamentals of stock trading, goes into stock history, explains how the market behaves (or doesn't), gives you a formula for several different trading scenarios, demonstrates how to find an undervalued company, and explains how to manage your portfolio.

What if He takes His place in history / With all the prophets and the kings / Who taught us love and came in peace / But then the story ends, what then... But what if you're wrong / What if there's more / What if there's hope / You never dreamed of hoping for

For some people they just live in today's world no history their Mom and Dad taught them..

Unfortunately, the education system in the USA has been so bad at teaching science and natural history for so long that there are many, many such people around today.

Portier's sympathetic treatment of the struggles of Denis J. O'Connell, John R. Slattery, William L. Sullivan, and Joseph McSorley to find a path for Catholicism in modernity illuminate a lot of history that has been in the shadows — and which, brought to light, teaches important lessons for today.

And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.

It seems to be in vogue today to find ways to attack the Church, to look for cases in history where it is claimed the Church may have been mistaken in its judgments and teachings.

It was because these events were so understood, that the little kingdoms of Israel and Judah, which grew out of the invasion of Palestine, made a fertile ground for the later prophetic teaching about God's revelation in history.

We can not idealise the Church or the state there, but we can be thankful for the rich history of both — and for the many lessons they can teach us in the West and in the world of Islam.

This position is not only taught in the AACS science textbooks but in texts for history, geography, social science and literature.

He argued from the Qur» an and early Muslim history that Islam is a doctrine of self - assertion which teaches man to work for the attainment of worldly power and to attempt the conquest of the self and the non-self.

The artist, who dedicates himself to beauty, «teaches us that man can not be explained by history alone and that he also finds a reason for his existence in the order of nature.

The ideas and teachings of Shaikh Ahmad Sirhindi are important in the history of Islam, for he has left a permanent impression on Indian Muslim thought.

We consider what he taught about God and his will for man immeasurably more important than what any other person in human history has said or done.

Some hope for the kingdom of God to come on earth — as Jesus taught his disciples to pray - but others expect the denouement of history in another world.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

In 1996 the NAE addressed religious persecution saying that «If people are to fulfill the obligations of conscience, history teaches the urgent need to foster respect and protection for the right of all persons to practice their faith.»

At one point in history, it was a great way to reach the community for Jesus and teach and train these new believers about Jesus.

For Origen, the truth embedded in the «semblance of history» is the teaching that God is the ultimate source of everything that exists.

By teaching Israel about the scapegoat, and indeed, implanting the scapegoat mechanism into the hearts of people around the world, God was preparing people for the ultimate scapegoat of human history — Jesus Christ.

If we are going to teach a public ethic of eco-justice, we need public stories of eco-justice — public parables that have the capacity to communicate the meaning of our love for the earth and for people as citizens: the reality of the struggle for eco-justice in the ongoing history of our civic communities.

It is a ruse to forward a Godless and almost Marxist agenda and as history teaches us Godless Marxism has ALWAYS led to dire, negative outcomes for ordinary and poor people.

(1) Biblical teaching is coherent and self - consistent: for, as I said above, with whatever variety of literary form and personal style from writer to writer and with whatever additions and amendments as redemptive history progressed, it all proceeds from one source; namely, the mind of God the Holy Spirit.

My caution was perhaps the product of the hard lessons I have learned during the three years that I, a confirmed Protestant, have taught church history at a Roman Catholic seminary located within the confines of a Benedictine priory — a seminary for the education of men with belated vocations.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

The deposit of revelation is said to be finished or fixed, but this can be a salvific teaching only if it means that there is sufficient evidence in our past history to convince us that we live within the horizon of a promise which by its nature always looks to the future for fulfillment.

If history has taught us nothing else, it has taught us how selfish a person is and how far he / she will go, to justify their lack of caring for others in their society.

Through most of Christian history the Christian has for this purpose turned to the authoritative teaching of the church, and this included the Bible.

Through participation in the life of the Church, its liturgy, sacraments, teachings, and praxis, we are enabled to situate ourselves within the revelatory vision of Christ with its promise for the liberation of the whole of history and creation.

This explains why the innovative intellectual leadership required for revamping church history and reconceiving the teaching of history across the entire academic syllabus, both secular and theological, has been painfully slow in emerging.

If you search the Coursera website on «evolution», you will see that «Evolution: A Course for Educators» taught by instructors from the American Museum of Natural History» and «Genes and the Human Condition (From Behavior to Biotechnology)» taught by professors at the University of Maryland both start in June.

Therefore, we must be extremely cautious about any teaching to the contrary, for nearly all Christians throughout church history have held to this belief.

No different from you being indoctrinated to believe what your school taught you about US history, for example.

The section is also a reminder of Whitehead's 1921 suggestion that the history of technology play a part in the teaching of classics (this is made anonymously toward the end of the Commission Report, and singled out for particular emphasis in Whitehead's subsequent article on» «The Classics in Education.»)

Nicea teaches dogmatically: the true God needs, and the gospel provides, no semidivine mediator of access to him, for the gospel proclaims a God who is not in fact distant, whose deity is identified with a person of our history. . .

Some Christians acknowledge the distinction between the Gospel stories and the history behind them and argue that the starting point for Christian theology is not the faith of the New Testament but the teaching and ministry of Jesus.