Sentences with phrase «for thought on the subject»

With the topic of NAFTA now brought up, the first of the audience questions prompted the panelists for their thoughts on the subject.

Hello.This article was extremely fascinating, particularly since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Friday.

Thanks for your thoughts on the subject.

This article was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Thursday.

This article was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last week

Read the article for my thoughts on the subject.

Hello.This article was really interesting, especially since I was investigating for thoughts on this subject last week.

(Click here to read my blog, I can't stop thinking about Sandra Bullock's thighs, for my thoughts on the subject.)

Not exact matches

While we won't know for sure the identities of all of this year's Oscar winners until host Jimmy Kimmel kicks off the festivities on ABC this Sunday, the small cottage industry of Academy Award predictions has plenty of thoughts on the subject.

Early on, I'd fixate on the fact that people would only work for someone who they thought knew more than them in a given subject area.

For answers, he went first to academic research on the subject, and then thought back on his own experience as an entrepreneur.

The series of studies tested the effects of power hierarchies on team productivity by creating teams with either a mixed propensity towards leadership — in one case some participants were primed to feel powerful by thinking of a time they wielded power over others while others subjects were asked to envision a time they were bossed around before joining the group — or teams made up entirely of hard charging leadership types or participants primed for a meeker, go along, get along approach.

One of his views that always stuck with me on that subject, at least as a starting point for thinking about it, was that it was somewhat nonsensical to talk about what «equilibrium exchange rates» should be in a world of fiat currencies and fractional reserve banking.

I hope it will be a useful way for me to solidify my thinking on policy issues and subject my thinking to a form of peer review from you.

Ideally I would think it would be really nice for you, me and many of the other commenters of all views could just sit in a coffee shop and casually talk about our ideas on the subject.

I know it is comforting to think that, and by all means, if it makes life for you easier, then fine, believe... but you can not logically argue with Atheists and expect not to look foolish on the subject matter because your belief is not based on logic.

They may say that modern (or postmodern) thought has «moved beyond» what Aquinas, for instance, had to say about the interaction of nature and history, but in fact they typically have not the foggiest notion of what Aquinas said, or even whether he said anything at all on the subject.

The clarity for your publish is simply nice and that i could think you are a professional on this subject.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

I think you are totally right in saying that most people do not even realise what is really going on, and the ones who do, generally leave — and are subjected to shame for it.

That article, like Hans Urs von Balthasar's book on the same subject, tries to convince the reader that anyone who thinks some will not finally be saved can not legitimately «hope for all.»

The point about all these pontifications, I thought at the time, whether over the airwaves or in the print media, either by secular commentators or by the kind of Catholics the liberal media like to give a platform to because their views on the Catholic tradition are so similar to their own (it seemed by the beginning of the conclave that it had all been going on for ever) was — or so I reflected then in my simple way — that this wonderful free - for - all was the only chance for many of them to be heard at all on this subject.

Second, he has thought deeply on the subject and comes from a charismatic tradition that often values the roles of Ephesians 4 highly, so I think it makes for an interesting viewpoint.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

James Nelson's very popular book, Embodiment, provides an exemplary instance of revisionist Christian thinking on this subject, and it does so for two reasons.

Aside from this subject David, did you catch any of the Dali Lamaâ $ ™ s thoughts on his inauguration of the Dalai Lama Center for Peace and Education.

The reasons for such sermonic silence are varied, ranging probably from a fear of being thought morbid through a fear of sounding other - worldly to a fear of not knowing what to say on so moot a subject.

On first thought, no subject of study would seem a less likely candidate for the office as liberator of the human spirit.

Man is not entitled to speak his mind on any subject apart from the need or demand for his thoughts.

What if your son or daughter told you they were gay?Would you follow your narrow - minded, religious bigotry, and curse them to hell?Or, could you find a way to change your mind and continue to love them?Would you slap your kid in the face and kick them out of the house and ask your god why he is so cruel to little - old you?Do yourself a favour and spend a moment thinking on this subject before you spout your hate - fulll nonsense again... and for crying out loud, LAY OFF THE KFC!!

A friend who has been teaching a course on constitutional law for a couple of decades and has achieved a national reputation confided recently that he plans to stop teaching the course; there just isn't any integrity to the subject, and it becomes almost a degrading experience to have to teach, say, equal protection doctrine and pretend that the Court's decisions are the product of any sort of coherent thinking.

For many who have already studied the subject, Justin's thoughts on the various biblical passages related to homosexuality will perhaps be something of a repeat.

The difficulty and the concerns I have for this subject is that instead of people being led to God through His only Son Jesus they will sit back instead of continuing on their life's journey thinking that all roads lead to God.

The honeymoon, that is, between the now enfeebled and increasingly remote souls who for over a quarter of a century had carped and sneered at Pope John Paul II (and by the same token at «PanzerCardinal» Joseph Ratzinger) but who had nevertheless hoped against hope for a Pope who would be somehow reborn if not as a fully paid - up liberal, as a Pope at least who would go easy on all that counter-cultural JPII stuff about being «signs of contradiction» and about continuity with the pre-conciliar Church and who had breathlessly found (so they thought) that, lo, it was even so, in the wonders of Deus Caritas Est. «On his election last spring,» carolled The Tablet, «the former CardinalRatzinger was widely assumed to have as his papal agenda the hammering of heretics and a war on secularist relativism, subjects with which he was associated as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.&raquon all that counter-cultural JPII stuff about being «signs of contradiction» and about continuity with the pre-conciliar Church and who had breathlessly found (so they thought) that, lo, it was even so, in the wonders of Deus Caritas Est. «On his election last spring,» carolled The Tablet, «the former CardinalRatzinger was widely assumed to have as his papal agenda the hammering of heretics and a war on secularist relativism, subjects with which he was associated as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.&raquOn his election last spring,» carolled The Tablet, «the former CardinalRatzinger was widely assumed to have as his papal agenda the hammering of heretics and a war on secularist relativism, subjects with which he was associated as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.&raquon secularist relativism, subjects with which he was associated as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.»

Like Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, Leonard Mlodinow, and Peter Atkins, Krauss evidently thinks that actually knowing something about philosophy and theology is no prerequisite for pontificating on these subjects.

Thanks for your thought on what is a difficult subject.

Mike i have been thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i think we will get into a good debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz

I think you already know my stance on this subject but for more clarity I will answer my own question.

I wrote openly this year about our struggles with much evangelical thought on these subjects and the catalyst for those conversations was this very book.

For Piaget, as for his predecessors, the living organism was the prototype of a holistic structure and the connecting link between, on the one hand, physical - chemical systems and, on the other hand, the thinking subject (S 4For Piaget, as for his predecessors, the living organism was the prototype of a holistic structure and the connecting link between, on the one hand, physical - chemical systems and, on the other hand, the thinking subject (S 4for his predecessors, the living organism was the prototype of a holistic structure and the connecting link between, on the one hand, physical - chemical systems and, on the other hand, the thinking subject (S 40).

I really appreciate Webb's scholarship on the subject, and I think his approach has been thoughtful and accessible... but I just can't honestly read the Bible and say to myself, «Now there's a case for women's rights!»

So we get to the heart of the issue when for our part we make Whitehead's «actual entities» a «subject of doubt,» and judge them by what seems to us to have been handed on for thought «of old and now and always.»

They also made mortgage lenders subject to lawsuits — by special - interest groups and pressure groups — if they insisted on what for generations had been thought to be due diligence.

«I think we should trust Eugene Peterson that for whatever reasons he's misspoke and he now is confirming he holds what he describes as a traditional biblical view on the subject of same - sex relationships.»

I've seen some comments about how ignorant Kelly is for bringing up this subject and I think too many of you are the ignorant ones who can't stand to see anything on Fox news that you don't agree with.

At the time it was thought to be on the list of areas to be declared off - bounds for blacks, who would be subject to «relocation» - forced removal.

The fact that he has not really spoken on the subject since leaves room for the possibility of some evolution in his thinking and approach.

I have been studying and thinking about this subject for fifteen years so far, and have been working on a book for over a year which explains my proposal, but I am facing problems with putting it into words.

I genuinely was interested in this subject because of late it has somewhat been playing on my mind and so sought to discover the truth on the matter and so sought out discussions and literature by christian writers that I might examine their different stances on the issue and try to find a moral cross-section as I think is appropriate for all questions since the ranging views are like politics ranging from far left wing to far right wing views.

When a priest chides a penitent for indulging in sinful thoughts, they both assume that behind the agency which controls his actual sinful thinking there is another agency which decides what subject he should think about; and so on ad infinitum.