This doesn't make
for unbiased science.
Not exact matches
Although the cancer study has been challenged by the European Food Safety Agency (a group that has strong food industry ties), I will side with the
unbiased Center
for Science in the Public Interest on this one.
Register - Mihalik recognized that «there is certainly potential
for this type of technology to have great implications in the identification of concussion as the
science advances,» but, she argued, «we need more scientific and
unbiased evidence of their ability to detect concussion before they are widely used and recommended in all settings.
Mikovits is unqualified in her gratitude to Lipkin
for insisting that
unbiased science be done.
It's not enough, says the CEOSE report, to support and encourage individuals; institutions must also change to offer «truly
unbiased and open environments
for science, math, and engineering education and career progression,» environments that foster inclusion and nurture participation.
More evidence that careful and
unbiased interpretation is necessary
for true
science.
Feline Nutrition has become the go - to source
for unbiased,
science - backed information on bio-appropriate diets
for cats.
This is not what I would call
unbiased coverage of the
science (or the policy
for that matter), and this is definitely not biased in the direction that Pat claims.
Dr Curry — some thoughts With the election of Mr Trump a new door opens, one of equality
for good
unbiased science.
They called
for an
unbiased and objective judicial review of the whole sorry process of climate
science and its associated political leveraging following which they reversed all their earlier edicts and returned to the process of trying to direct policy
for the enrichment of all classes of society.
Despite our sincerest aim of using
science as an objective and
unbiased tool to record natural history, we are reminded that
science is a human construct, often driven by human needs to tell a compelling story, to reinforce the positive, and to compete
for limited resources — publication trends and communication bias is a proof of that.
James, only biased warmists point to «Craptical
Science» as a neutral
unbiased scientific source
for anything.
His rules
for good conduct of
science are worthy, especially number 10: «Above all, the conduct of
science must be honest and
unbiased.
In light of the parade of controversies and improper conduct that has been uncovered, we know that the IPCC can not be relied upon
for objective,
unbiased science — so EPA should not rely upon it to reach a decision that will hurt small businesses, farmers, ranchers, and the larger Texas economy.»