To best set the stage
for understanding these distinctions, I'd like to introduce you to John.
Not exact matches
In summary, the key to
understanding the current market environment is to explicitly make a
distinction between 1) the long - term and full - cycle market outlook, which is primarily driven by valuations, and 2) the near - term outlook
for the current «segment» of the market cycle, which is primarily driven by the risk preferences of investors.
A
distinction that comes across when interacting with the executive team, listening to recorded presentations, and interfacing with their site is they seem sincerely committed (passionate actually) to efficiently and cost - effectively filling the funding gap that's existed between individual real estate developers looking
for short - term loans
for their fix - and - flip, bridge loans, and other construction projects and investors who
understand the investment value of real estate and want to fund those projects.
Comparing the two cryptocurrencies will provide a basis
for understanding of the fundamental ways in which they are similar, as well as highlight the numerous
distinctions between them.
There could,
for instance, be a holdback of 15 %, and a repayment of 30 %, so it's important
for the business owner to
understand the
distinction.
Oliver O'Donovan has noted that this
distinction between making and begetting, crucial
for Christians»
understanding of God, carries considerable moral significance.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known
distinction between
understanding and reason as two levels of thinking,
for involved in this
distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic of the
understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in nature.
I will also try to establish, or at least render plausible, the view that while the
distinction between a logic of reason and a logic of the
understanding may have been one that was necessary and legitimate
for Hegel to maintain, it has, given developments in modern logic, as well as changes in the modern view of the nature of metaphysical thinking, become obsolescent.
For Whitehead, given his implicit rejection of the Hegelian
distinction between a logic of the
understanding and a logic of reason, and given his conception of the nature of the metaphysical argument, God is not, and can not be the inevitable culmination of such a logical progression.
To make the
distinction between OPINION and FACT easier
for you to
understand I'll use the following example: If the Pope declared that the Earth was flat would you agree?
Let us assume
for the moment this
distinction as valid and important and its meaning as
understood.
I suspect,
for instance, that Hartshorne's
distinction between necessary, a priori truths and contingent, a posteriori truths may commit the error of trusting in dichotomies (cf. AD xi, 134) when it is applied to our
understanding of God's activity.
I may agree with you there to some degree, but I do think 1 Cor 15 makes a definite
distinction), as the means of Justification salvation (I would quantify belief here, as the agreement of the fact of Jesus death
for ones own personal sins (
Understanding one is a sinner and needs a savior) on the cross, That he was buried, and was raised to life on the third day).
They will rightly point to the danger that the
distinction between «two realms» and the «voluntaristic»
understanding of God's activity in creation may simply grease the skids
for the slide into secularity.
We agree that the
distinction of actuality and potentiality is crucial
for understanding the extensive continuum in its relation to past, present, and future.
In the debates over humanitarian intervention in the 1990s some moralists made a
distinction between «war,» which they
understood as having to do with state uses of armed force
for their own interests, and intervention by military force
for humanitarian purposes, which they regarded as altruistic and not «war.»
One must
understand the full significance of this presentness if one is to
understand the symbolic function and the dependent and mediate reality of the I - It relation (Karl Heim has made Buber's
distinction between the presentness of the l - Thou relation and the pastness of I - It the basis
for his whole philosophy of dimensions and hence in turn of his theology.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known
distinction between
understanding and reason as two levels of thinking,
for involved in this
distinction is the view...
We know in advance that there can be no ultimate
distinction,
for both must be
understood as participating in a more inclusive unity.
But this
distinction is lost on many Muslims who lack the theological context
for understanding nuanced Christian teaching on the Trinity.
As I
understand my assignment
for this conference, it is to represent a «methodological alternative in process theology» that has been given the name «rationalist» so as to facilitate its
distinction from two other such alternatives, the empirical and speculative so - called.
Thus Cyril C. Richardson has criticized the classical formulations of the Trinity as imposing an arbitrary «threeness» upon our theological thinking, and proposes instead a basic twofold
distinction between God as Absolute and God as Related.1 This is
for Richardson a basic paradox, an apparent self - contradiction,
for if we try to bring these aspects into relationship, we compromise God's absoluteness.2 Charles Hartshorne accepts this same twofold
distinction, but he removes the contradictory element by
understanding it in terms of the abstract and concrete dimensions of God's nature and experience.3
And, if God is defined that way then there is no
distinction between God and the common
understanding of science and therefore no need
for the term God.
NOMINUS: And, if God is defined that way then there is no
distinction between God and the common
understanding of science and therefore no need
for the term God.
Though his
distinction should not be stretched too far, it is quite useful at least as a starting point
for understanding the meaning of revelation in history.
Perhaps, with a clear
understanding of the
distinction between the two — needs versus wants — it may be easier
for some to realize and accept the importance of meeting early childhood needs.
It is important
for parents and caregivers to
understand the
distinction between the two.
Reading the comment carefully, you
understand that the father (and child) feel less shame about taking advantage of school meals at breakfast, where the service is universal (available to all regardless of economic need) versus at lunch, where there is often a more visible
distinction between paying and nonpaying students, or between students on the federally reimbursable lunch line versus those who can purchase
for - cash (and often more desirable) «a la carte» food, or (in the case of high schoolers) between students who can go off campus to buy lunch at convenience stores and restaurants versus those with no money in their pockets.
It is possible that such a
distinction may be important
for understanding how depression impacts home visiting and how it should best be addressed.
That Weiner appears not to
understand the
distinction is yet another reason to question his fitness
for the mayoralty.
Betsy DeVos
understands this
distinction and
for years has embraced a variety of education solutions to meet this need.
Those concerned that they could be criminalized
for their repugnant or offensive ideas fail to
understand a crucial
distinction in the law.
Those of us who are readers of this blog tend to
understand this
distinction and choose to read our news as it breaks rather than wait
for the next issue of a journal.
The
distinction is crucial
for understanding how atherosclerosis develops as well as determining whether CRP is a useful drug target — and whether lowering it can save lives.
His response, in which he criticizes my statement that «it is likely that the most abundant potential replacements
for conventional oil will be more expensive than oil has been», makes one wonder whether he
understands the
distinction himself.
As yet the American people do not
understand the
distinctions, and we in this country are prone to rush,
for a time, at any new thing.
«We found several
distinctions between sensitive and resistant models detected at the single - cell level, which testified to single - cell sequencing potential usefulness
for understanding how these cancers may develop resistance.»
The report notes the «increasingly blurred
distinction between genomics research and clinical care» highlighted by the PHG Foundation, and particularly that the broad consent process used in the 100,000 Genomes Project is «unlikely to be feasible
for routine genomic medicine in the NHS without an extensive and continuing public debate to raise public
understanding and acceptance».
I bring Godiva, we all eat, and walk away
understanding the
distinction between quantity and quality, and how to make that work
for you in everyday life.
Understanding this
distinction can help you work out the best diet
for your health.
In this workshop we will explore the many aspects of Holistic Healing and flower essence therapy including: Dr. Edward Bach and the history of Flower Essences,
understanding Bach's 38 remedies, how to combine flower essences to make effective therapeutic remedies, working with chronic vs acute conditions, commonly used flower essences and combinations
for Transformational Healing, the art of case taking and finding out the key symptoms, working with intuition,
distinctions between Flower Essences and other forms of energy medicine and much more.
Understanding those
distinctions and having a thankfulness
for them can fortify a relationship and fabricate a dependable bond that a couple can treasure.
Understanding those
distinctions and having a thankfulness
for them can reinforce a relationship and assemble an enduring bond that a couple can value.
Can be easily broken down into separate parts, which include accurate, concise and easy to
understand full coverage of the following sub-topics: Absolute and Relative Poverty
Distinction between Wealth and Income Causes of Inequality Inequality Metrics including the Lorenz Curve and how the GINI index (GINI coefficient) is derived GINI indices
for major countries Kuznets Curve Government solutions including Negative Income Tax, welfare programmes and work incentives The «Trickle - down» Theory
Burris also skips over another critical
distinction — proponents of the standards don't demand that students grasp all the components of rigor (fluency, conceptual
understanding, and application) when working with numbers between 20 and 100, rather that they familiarize themselves with the larger quantities as a basis
for future learning.
Our theory of action rests on the crucial
distinction that a target becomes a learning target only when students use it to aim
for understanding throughout today's lesson, and students can aim
for a target only when they know what it is.
For me,
understanding the
distinctions was a big aha moment.
Luxury meant something that was by definition overpriced, but was so nice, so lovely, in itself that you did not mind, in fact was so lovely that the expensiveness became part of the point, part of the
distinction between the people who could not afford a thing and the select few who not only could, but also
understood the desirability of paying so much
for it.
Specifically
for folks who don't
understand the
distinctions at Amazon.
Borrowers must
understand the
distinction in order to decide whether to apply
for one or the other.