Natural gas, specifically shale gas, is essential for powering backup generators
for unreliable wind and solar installations.
There would, of course, be little need for negawatts if it weren't
for unreliable wind and solar power plants being added to the grid.
Not exact matches
Matt Ridley,
for example, in his recent book, The Rational Optimist, argues that the oil sands are a much more sane solution to current energy needs than things like
wind (too
unreliable and too little output) and biofuels (wasteful use of land).
Now the western climate alarmists are so damn dumb that they think that somehow
wind has got more reliable after 400 years of getting rid of
wind power
for the very reasons of it's abysmally low and completely unpredictable and
unreliable power output in what was an industrializing society.
wind and solar do not replace fossil fuel generation, as that has to be maintained at and close to previous levels to cater
for power needs when the
unreliable, unpredictable
wind and solar generation systems go off line or fail or just don't produce much power.
If power generator owners and governments had decreed that the most inefficient and most
unreliable, most costly power generation systems that could be conceived to generate power
for our modern civilisation were to be the norm then the so called renewable energy systems of
wind and solar along with highly inefficient fossil fuel burning idling generators as standby's when the renewables fail to produce power then it is doubtful that a more hopelessly inefficient and
unreliable system could be devised
for a civilisation that depends so utterly on having dead steady, totally reliable, at call power every second of every day to run that civilisation's entire very sophisticated structures
In his February 2015 report
for the Institute
for Energy Research (IER), Fisher attacked
wind and solar power as «
unreliable» sources of electricity.
for the Institute
for Energy Research (IER), Fisher attacked
wind and solar power as «
unreliable» sources of electricity.
Since we began in December 2012, we have added to our concerns the economic and social harm caused by rocketing power prices and
unreliable power supplies, the product of heavily subsidised and intermittent
wind power: the results that have played out in Australia's
wind power capital, South Australia, will cripple that State at an economic and social level
for decades to come.
Ontario contracted
for far too much intermittent and
unreliable wind and solar power creating a domino effect the increased our costs of generation.
The supply is
unreliable, although more consistent than
wind generation which is notoriously
unreliable and thermal, nuclear, or hydro power (if available) is required to carry sufficient reserve in the grid system to compensate
for any changes in solar plant output due to any changes in sunlight during the day.
The taxpayers who paid
for the subsidies to build the
wind farms, then paid over the odds
for an
unreliable source of power generation will ultimately be left to pick up the bill
for clearing up the Green eco mess.
Fossil fuels take a naturally dirty environment and make it clean; they take a naturally dangerous climate and make it safer; the sun and
wind are intermittent,
unreliable fuels that always need backup from a reliable source of energy — usually fossil fuels; and, fossil fuels are the key to improving the quality of life
for billions of people in the developing world.
The
wind industry rushed to Ontario to enjoy the largesse of government support via a government program that granted above - market payments
for intermittent and
unreliable power.
The U.K. president
for German energy giant E.ON stated
wind power requires 90 % backup from gas or coal plants due to its
unreliable and intermittent nature.
But all told, they are winning the propaganda green game with green activists the world over, including Greenpeace China, praising China
for their «
unreliable» energy (
wind / solar) efforts!
IWTs MEAN HIGHER HYDRO BILLS
FOR EVERYONE: •
Wind energy will always be
unreliable.
Sound the death knell
for unreliable energy —
wind / solar — as a fanciful baseload alternative to fossil fuels!
AS long as Left - wing / socialist governments can borrow and use other peoples» money
for ideological «green» symbolism, the economic rot of
unreliables —
wind and solar power — fed by a collective climate change madness, will continue unchallenged, despite what the majority of people want over the eco-elites and the > 25 year - old social justice warriors.
It may be that revenues will come entirely from capacity markets — payments
for being ready to produce power on demand — but
unreliable wind and solar will lose that competition to reliable conventional generators.
Wind and solar are intermittent and
unreliable methods
for generating electricity that requires backup, usually with natural gas turbines, which increases costs.
The fact is that over the last five years,
wind power has added more new electric generating capacity in the USA than coal and nuclear combined — in spite of the fact that both coal and nuclear have enjoyed large, and permanent public subsidies, while subsidies
for wind have been small, short - term and therefore
unreliable.
Big Oil is also Big Gas (the two fossil fuels often come from the same wells) and gas is the ideal fuel
for backing up
unreliable wind and solar power.
Nevertheless, the CPP will cause states, taxpayers, and energy consumers to get stiffed with huge cost burdens, including capital - intensive, decades - long transitions needed
for adding expensive and
unreliable wind and solar infrastructures, coal plant retirements and upgrades, restructured transmission lines, and new natural gas pipelines.
Instead, billions have been squandered on
unreliable wind and solar power which can only ever be a supplement
for gas, rather than a free - standing source of energy.
It is important to weigh up the risks: keep an existing, good standing tenant paying a lower rental increase, or
wind up with an
unreliable tenant that could lead to your home sitting empty
for months.
Some like Germany continue to build and plan
for more coal generating plants because
wind is
unreliable as a source of energy... how green is that?