Sentences with phrase «for uterine rupture»

Any other type of incision increases the risk for uterine rupture.

Additionally, in one study evaluating risk factors for uterine rupture, no significant association was found with the presence of an unknown scar (81).

Not exact matches

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology reports a three-fold increased risk of uterine rupture for women who attempt to have a VBAC with a pregnancy that began fewer than six months after the end of the last one.

reports a three-fold increased risk of uterine rupture for women who attempt to have a VBAC with a pregnancy that began fewer than six months after the end of the last one.

Any hospital that says they can not support a VBAC mother because they aren't prepared to handle the consequences of a uterine rupture are not safe places for any birthing mother to give birth.

Eileen puts uterine rupture into perspective in a playful and understandable way, for example, you are more likely to be in a bicycle accident, to be murdered, to die of heart disease, to have a cord prolapse or to have twins.

I scoured the Internet for data and stories on VBACs, other women's success or failure stories of doing them at home, and what the risk of uterine rupture was all about.

The risk of uterine rupture was cited as one of the main reasons for the urgency in this case but this risk is widely reported as being 0.1 % or 1/1000.

If you've had one c - section with the typical low - transverse uterine incision and are considered a good candidate for VBAC, most studies estimate the risk of rupture during labor to be less than one percent.

I am fed up with the VBAC whining, hereby I suggest the following informed consent, «I, Ms Somebody, am aware that Hospital Somewhere can't offer me a safe VBAC because it doesn't have an anaestaegiologist all around the clock but I insist on having a VBAC anyway and I take full responsibility for the possible uterine rupture and my baby's possible death.»

A large population - based study from Canada found that the risk of severe maternal morbidities ---- defined as hemorrhage that requires hysterectomy or transfusion, uterine rupture, anesthetic complications, shock, cardiac arrest, acute renal failure, assisted ventilation, venous thromboembolism, major infection, or in - hospital wound disruption or hematoma ---- was increased threefold for cesarean delivery as compared with vaginal delivery (2.7 % versus 0.9 %, respectively)(7).

The greatest concern for women who have had a previous cesarean is the risk of uterine rupture during a vaginal birth.

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001184 Basically, risk of uterine rupture is very low for vbac1.

If the risk of future uterine rupture is unacceptable to you people, then why do you keep advocating for HBACs?

If your ob / gyn says you need a c / sec and you refuse b / c you believe s / he is wrong or you refuse b / c you do not want to risk a uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy, who then takes full unequivocal responsibility for the present birth's outcome?

Interesting only 2 of the studies in the review looked a uterine rupture — a greater risk for women who have previously laboured.

I want a home birth but am scared of uterine rupture even though I know therisk is very small... any advice for me?

Three studies have reported no association (49, 77, 81), whereas a fourth has suggested an increased risk of uterine rupture for women undergoing TOLAC who have not had a prior vaginal delivery (relative risk [RR], 2.3; P <.0001)(79).

For example, among three large studies investigating prostaglandins for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean delivery, one found an increased risk of uterine rupture (89), another reported no increased rupture risk (5), and a third found no increased risk of rupture when prostaglandins were used alone (with no subsequent oxytocin)(For example, among three large studies investigating prostaglandins for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean delivery, one found an increased risk of uterine rupture (89), another reported no increased rupture risk (5), and a third found no increased risk of rupture when prostaglandins were used alone (with no subsequent oxytocin)(for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean delivery, one found an increased risk of uterine rupture (89), another reported no increased rupture risk (5), and a third found no increased risk of rupture when prostaglandins were used alone (with no subsequent oxytocin)(6).

This study was limited by reliance on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coding for diagnosis of uterine rupture and was unable to determine whether prostaglandin use itself or the context of its use (eg, an unfavorable cervix or need for multiple induction agents) was associated with uterine rupture.

Personnel familiar with the potential complications of TOLAC should be present to watch for fetal heart rate patterns that are associated with uterine rupture.

Those at high risk of uterine rupture (eg, those with previous classical uterine incision or T - incision, prior uterine rupture, or extensive transfundal uterine surgery) and those in whom vaginal delivery is otherwise contraindicated (eg, those with placenta previa) are not generally candidates for planned TOLAC.

A large multicenter study of women attempting TOLAC (n = 33,699) also showed that augmentation or induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture when compared with spontaneous labor (1.4 % for induction with prostaglandins with or without oxytocin, 1.1 % for oxytocin alone, 0.9 % for augmented labor, and 0.4 % for spontaneous labor).

Given the lack of compelling data suggesting an increased risk with of uterine rupture with mechanical dilation and transcervical catheters, such interventions may be an option for TOLAC candidates with an unfavorable cervix.

It is our opinion that any birth environment, home or hospital, that is ill - equipped to manage an obstetrical emergency is a dangerous place for any woman to birth her baby, as uterine rupture in physiologic birth is no more likely than any other obstetrical emergency any maternity center may face.

It's difficult for doctors to diagnose uterine rupture until it actually happens, Unfortunately, if the uterus manages to tear during delivery, not only will baby have a difficult time being born, but both mom and baby get placed in a life - threatening situation that needs to be remedied immediately.

You're not a candidate for VBAC if you had a uterine rupture during a previous pregnancy.

For me, the slight risk of a uterine rupture is enough to merit the risks of surgery.

And if we opt for the VBAC, my experience will vary greatly from the natural childbirth I experienced with my daughter, and I will need to learn how to mitigate the danger of uterine rupture.

Call us today at [phone] for a free consultation with an experienced New Orleans VBAC and uterine rupture attorney.

The most serious complication from VBAC, uterine rupture, occurs when scar tissue from the previous C - section tears open, and the results can be catastrophic for both baby and mother.