Sentences with phrase «for valid interpretations»

Not to recognize this reality leads us to using the 2014 SB achievement levels and disseminating more than three million student test scores for California students and schools that have no basis for valid interpretations....

Not exact matches

My leadership in the past has used the book (not trying to be disrespectful), and specifically their interpretation as the only valid one, to remove my freedom to think for myself.

But this does not mean that what was seen as valid and relevant for one time should necessarily be seen as valid and relevant for all time, especially since this interpretation carries certain unfortunate notions prevalent at that time.

Indeed, for her, as for an increasing number of scholars, the text is open to various valid interpretations.

In one sense this criticism is indeed valid, for in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himself.

For you to suggest that there may be some other «valid» interpretation if one takes into consideration the «historical / cultural context of scripture», is to invoke a straw man logical fallacy.

In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible war.

Your own interpretation of the Bible is only as valid as the pastor who interprets it for you from the pulpit.

It's not a valid excuse for such a being, to say that the flaw is in the interpretations by readers; such a purportedly divine being should be perfectly (yes, stress that word «perfectly»!)-RRB-

Being a subjective statistic it is hard to get many valid conclusions from the data provided as the definition of a clear cut chance is up for interpretation.

(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government of Ghana * and therefore had no valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do not involve, according to the relevant case law, the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and do not therefore fall within the ambit of the Court's original jurisdiction under Article 130 (1) of the 1992 Constitution.

This triangulation is critical for arriving at inferences or interpretations that are as valid and accurate as possible.

But today, I come over to find some serious love for Mr. Smith, who's spending him some tax dollars in order to steer the science of climate more towards what he, as a freakin» politician, thinks is the more valid interpretation of the evidence.

What the Berliner's summary says is that: IF we have a temporal chaotic system and IF this system is ergodic THEN a stochastical interpretation is possible Unfortunately neither of the ifs is valid for weather / climate.

At this moment we have all the hounds of hell rushing on Fred Pierce's neck for a normal journalistic habit of depending on a source for an interpretation of an actors attitude — and such a pathetically minor thing — and then we have Gavin Schmidts email confirming that interpretation is valid — and for you logic, «deepclimate» naifs out there, that an interpretation is «valid» doesn't mean it's necessarillary the right interpretation!

Courts on judicial review do view expertise as a valid doctrinal reason for deference, and are willing to put aside their own interpretation of a statute in favour of a decision - maker's.