Sentences with phrase «for voting problems»

All the sites front pages are predominantly top - down (campaign - driven) tools, but at least Obama and Huckabee's sites try to feature their supporters and their enthusiasm (and provide a public reporting system for voting problems).

Not exact matches

He had a knack for nailing Toronto's problems so that enemies frothed and believers voted.

The MP for Richmond Park hasn't been able to win over the black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) vote either, and this is a problem given that this social group is on the rise in the capital.

Analysts, however, said the nominations to the board — to be cut to 12 directors from a previous 18 and voted on by shareholders in April — would do little to distract from the problems accumulating for GE.

Several Republican senators have said they would have a problem voting for any tax bill that significantly increased the deficit.

The 104.7 March reading, down from 107.6 in February, remains among the highest in survey history and for the first time since 1982, taxes received the fewest number of votes as the number one problem.

The vote highlighted the state's housing and homeless problem as a election - year issue that promises to dominate the state's politics for years.

-- Vote for fiscal conservatives who want to fix problem; — Educate ourselves (through discussions like these); and — Make personal investment decisions with a sober understanding of the facts.

Transfer payments, regional subsidies and even the announcements for universities, regional slush funds or rural broadband financing announced over the last few months, they all share the intended two - prong effect: vote - buying, and spreading the illusion that the federal government can fix a local problem, be it in classrooms or in lousy internet connections.

If Benchmark had no problem with the voting agreement for 14 months, as Kalanick alleges, then that could help Kalanick's argument against the need for an injunction.

But the problem here is that Cambridge Analytica did not just employ sophisticated mass marketing, it went the whole hog and ran very specific targeted marketing campaigns for Trump while an allegedly linked Canadian company used the same technology on behalf of the Vote Leave campaign during the EU Referendum.

I mean, as long as the person voted in works for the citizens of the US... what's the problem?

I understand that Israel has problems but the GOP only does this to win votes from the evangelicals, who don't understand they don't they are just being taken for a ride, ironically more ways then 1.

A taste: Here again, the problem is that Sen. Obama wants us to transcend something at the same time he implicitly asks us to give that same something as a reason to vote for him.

Im surprised these so called conservatives are ok in attacking the president for being a Muslim and a closeted atheist but they have no problem voting for a non-Christian guy..

The biggest problem with how people voted for President is that social issues took too much of a precedent.

In practice, most people are at least partially aware of this problem and so vote for one of the two major parties, who divide up their positions to try and get just over half of the practical voters.

Sure, some of them vote for Bachmann, some for Palin, others for Santorum or Rick Perry, but all of these charlatans offer the same snake oil, backward, 18th Century solutions to 21st century problems.

@ab - seems like the problem is that their isn't any atheist out there that can convince the population to vote for them.

Thus, by your logic, you should have no problem with Muslims making up 80 - 90 % of your country's population, voting primarily for Muslim candidates, and constantly striving to make their belief system the law of the land - as is the case with Christians in the United States.

By the time W finished his second term, I had graduated from college, come to terms with the fact that the criminalization of abortion is highly unlikely no matter the party in power, expanded my definition of «pro-life» to include Iraqi children and prisoners of war, and experienced first - hand some of the major problems with America's healthcare system, which along with poverty and education issues, contributes to the troubling abortion rate in the U.S. I remained pro-life idealistically, but for the first time, voted for a pro-choice president, hoping that the reforms I wanted to see in the healthcare, the economy, immigration, education, and for the socioeconomically disadvantaged would function pragmatically to reduce abortions.

These so - called Christians have no problem voting for a man who openly admits believing in a religion that REJECTS CHRIST.

The day that Islam advocates all freedom for all women I will have no problem with more Mosques, in the meantime, because this belief / Creed / Religion as it is now (and has been over thousands of years under the world's noses) women are still not allowed to vote, women are not doctors, they do not study to become lawyers, owners of companies, presidents of countries.

With slavery a thing of the past, with segregation banned, with the right to vote for everyone, what is the problem?

I have no problem with it lets just not make it a national priority to get votes for one groups agenda.

To conclude, I have no problem with evangelical Christians voting for Romney.

Similarly, I hope that if you've decided to vote for Clinton, you've spoken out concerning the ongoing ethics problems that go back decades and now continue to surface every day, and her stance on abortion and many more issues that defile all people who are made in the image of God.

As for the stats there have been a problem lately because they do not reflect what really happens when people vote so there is a disconnect between the stats and actual votes.

WDinDallas, the problem is Christians are voting for a wolf in sheep clothing potentially..

Obama is an atheist who only masquerades as religious when it's time for votes, which i have no problem with.

Back on less insane ground, the Republicans faced a problem with the Stupak Amendment: Support it, and thereby give cover for pro-life Democrats to vote for the final bill?

If you want to vote for someone to represent you who believes this stuff, it's your problem, not mine.

However, I think most Mormons are decent people and have zero problem voting for one.

There would be no courage and no glory in voting for a law based more on slogans than on arguments, in conforming to the dominant political correctness out of fear of the threatened anathema, and by counter-attacking as a last resort by a question such as: «Dven if there is no reason to pass a law, why is it a problem if we want to pass one?»

There would be no courage and no glory in voting for a law based more on slogans than on arguments, in conforming to the dominant political correctness out of fear of being anathematized, and in hiding behind a question such as: «Even if there is no reason to pass a law, why is it a problem if we want to pass one?»

I will be voting for Romney because Obama has had almost 4 years to try to fix the problems this country has, and he hasn't done a very good job, it is time for a change.

If dairy or eggs are your problem, vote for the vegan food idea, and if you need to avoid it all, vote for the allergy - free baked goods idea.

The little magician also scored 12 goals in that debut season and was voted by the Arsenal fans as our Player of the Year, but has since had to contend with the arrival of Mesut Ozil and now Alexis Sanchez, as well as a few injury problems of course, He does play for Arsenal after all.

Chelsea is champion but the will buy De Griezman from Atletico de Madrid they have the best defence in the league, the best Midfield in the league with De Griezman, hazard and Costa they will be came invecibles that what Mourinho want to take from Wenger and do not forget that Wenger will never beat Mourinho, we just need 3 world class players just like Henry said, But Wenger have no ambitions to win the league, next year will be the same excuses why we fail again, Mourinho sold Mata even so he was voted the best Chelsea player the previous two years, and Wenger want to keep ineffective players like Walcott, Wiltshere, Diaby, Flamini, Ryo.Sanogo.Welbeck, sad but that is our fate with Wenger only problem for us the risk of loosing player like Alexis will be great if we do not win next year, we must to buy like Henry said, like Carzola is saying, we lost so many good players because they want to win and they are winning with others clubs.why we do not give ouself a chance of winning the EPL?

I have just read a report that half of the board wanted Wenger out including Guzidis but kreonke overruled them in voting, so you know where the problem Wenger works for kreonke who interest money.

given the fact that the all encompassing area claims KC as their representative home until it comes to actually voting for things to happen in KC then it becomes the narrative oh well I live here not there so it's not my problem.

The Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010, up for a vote as early as today, would attempt to fix some of these problems through a variety of means, including allowing schools in high - poverty areas to offer free meals to all students without any paperwork, making foster children automatically eligible for free meals, and giving incentives to states that improve their certification rates.

Trustee Dwight Walton, who voted against the nature sanctuary proposal, said that after hearing complaints about the additional traffic and noise problems that would face the Lake Arlington neighborhood, he could not vote for the plan.

MY DESCRIPTIONS ARE ONLY FOR EFFECT, and you should vote on how bad YOU feel each problem is, not based on my description of it.

The problem with the second bullet point is that it's a good idea in theory but not usable in practice for two different reasons: (1) various cognitive biases would counteract your education from working when populist politically aligns with someone; (2) and conscious tactical choices would ensure that even those who are able to work around cognitive biases would still vote for that populist if they are aligned.

Strikes me that there are two options: (1) a homophobic liar who has no problem misleading voters, or (2) likes to speak the truth to only receptive audiences so they know it's safe to vote for him because he shares their values.

As for what «we're going to have a problem» might mean, Durant told me «yes» votes on raising taxes will «definitely going to take into consideration moving forward,» which could be particularly bad for the Senate Republicans, who got a big boost from the business community — Unshackle Upstate, NFIB and the Business Council — during the 2010 elections.

That could present a problem for the Senate Republicans, who provided three votes from Sens. Hugh Farley, Chuck Fuschillo and Roy McDonald, to pass the last round of extenders.

«The problem is that Charlie Rangel just voted, along with many Democrats for billions of dollars more for the Afghanistan War, and he will not face another vote on the Afghanistan War until after the Sept. 14th primary.

To overcome this problem we have, on behalf of the BBC, been beavering away at establishing which local authorities appear to be more likely to record a relatively strong vote for Remain, which are the ones where Leave can be expected to do relatively well, and which are the council areas where the two sides could be expected to be equally matched.