courses in the curriculum — especially the saturation of home economics courses with pop humanistic psychology — constitute the «establishment of religion»
forbidden by the Constitution's First Amendment.
@SJuan76 none of those powers are
forbidden by the constitution, but they are neither granted.
Both Congress and the state legislatures are expressly
forbidden by the Constitution from passing bills of attainder.
Not exact matches
Although the power of Congress to
forbid slavery in federal territories was well - established, Sandford argued that slaves were private property of the sort protected
by the
Constitution against deprivation without due process of law, and that therefore Congress lacked any constitutional authority to ban slavery in the territories.
The dispute was over an $ 8 million tax abatement, with the Masons contending that the state
constitution forbids such aid to an institution controlled
by a religious body.
``... Accordingly,
by this court's separate decision, order, and judgment, dated April 12, 2012, the petition has been denied, and this court has declared that the formula prescribed in article III, § 4 of the New York
Constitution does not
forbid New York from increasing the size of the New York State Senate to 63 seats in 2012.»
My discussion of the U.S.
Constitution in the blog post concludes that «bills of attainder and ex post facto laws..., if they were not explicitly
forbidden by particular clauses of the U.S.
Constitution, would be implicitly
forbidden by the separation of powers.»
He held that the lower court was in grievous error when it ordered the publication of Ibrahim's name pointing out that the decision of the high court was in total breach of the provision of section 36 of the 1999
constitution, which it said
forbade any court from denying fair hearing to a party likely to be affected
by final decision of the court.
Only a federally established church was
forbidden by the First Amendment (although most states disestablished their state religions after the
Constitution was adopted).
Mexico's
constitution currently
forbids outsiders from investing in the energy sector in exchange for a share of production, a global practice that has been embraced even
by communist Cuba.
True the existing
constitution does not grant such authority, but just to make sure such thing crystal clear, an amendment could crafted that specifically
forbids such or similar overreach
by the government at any time in the future.
Last but hardly least, the case could set the stage for a decision on an issue never squarely decided
by the court — whether the
Constitution forbids the execution of a defendant who can demonstrate «actual innocence.»
«Unlike the Congress of the United States, the General Assembly of Virginia functions under no grant of power»... The General Assembly, in «represent [ing] the sovereign authority of the people» is restricted only
by the
Constitution of Virginia «in express terms or
by strong implication»... [I] t is a restraining instrument, and... the General Assembly... possesses all legislative power not prohibited
by the
Constitution»... In short, «[u] nless
forbidden by some State or Federal constitutional provision,» the General Assembly's «powers are plenary.
The Fifth Amendment of the United States
Constitution, along with similar provisions in state
constitutions,
forbids the taking of private property
by the government for a public use without just compensation.