The Court held the school district's policy
a forbidden establishment of religion.
Not exact matches
That is why the founding fathers
forbade the
establishment of a state
religion.
Strict «Separationists» have questioned the legality
of this because they state that it violates United States Const.itution which
forbids the government from passing any law respecting the
establishment of a
religion.
courses in the curriculum — especially the saturation
of home economics courses with pop humanistic psychology — constitute the «
establishment of religion»
forbidden by the Constitution's First Amendment.
The Constitution
of the United States
forbids everything like an
establishment of a national
religion.»
The strict separationists — those who condemn every financial or ceremonial link
of government with
religion — have succeeded in persuading the courts over the past half - century to dismantle or
forbid any church - state association that might be viewed as an «
establishment of religion.»
In contrast to the idea
of a «wall,» the U.S. Constitution
forbids Congress to make any law «respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.»
The Court
of Appeal state at para 61 that the undercover officer did not compel any action for a religious purpose, because the Charter does not contain an
establishment clause that would
forbid state action promoting
religion.