Dr. Kumiko Hayashi and Dr. Shinsuke Niwa, assistant professors of Tohoku University, have successfully estimated the force exerted by motor proteins acting on neuronal cargo in living worms using a newly developed non-invasive
force measurement method.
The non-invasive
force measurement method based on the fluctuation theorem enabled measurement by analyzing the fluctuating behavior of cargo vesicles in the cytosol subject to thermal noise and so on.
Hayashi and Niwa expect the non-invasive
force measurement method to be a strong, new tool in understanding the physical mechanism of neuronal diseases caused by deficits in axonal transport.
Not exact matches
However, the two - mass model
method provides a tool that enables motion - based assessments of ground reaction
forces without direct
force measurements.
«Fabrication of Oriented Crystals as
Force Measurement Tips via Focused Ion Beam and Microlithography
Methods.»
This product includes the following 46 topics: Physical Science ♦ Clouds ♦ Fossils ♦ Landforms ♦ Layers of the Atmosphere ♦ Layers of the Earth ♦ Natural Disasters ♦ Natural Resources ♦ Plate Tectonics ♦ Rock Cycle ♦ Rocks and Minerals ♦ Volcanoes ♦ Water Cycle ♦ Weather Life Science ♦ Animal Adaptations ♦ Cell Structures (Organelles) ♦ Ecosystems ♦ Human Body Organs ♦ Human Body Systems ♦ Life Cycles ♦ Photosynthesis ♦ Plant Parts ♦ Six Kingdoms of Life ♦ Macromolecules ♦ Microscope Parts ♦ DNA ♦ Classification and Taxonomy Physical Science ♦ Atomic Structure ♦ Circuits ♦ Electricity and Magnetism ♦ Electromagnetic Spectrum ♦ Elements, Compounds, and Mixtures ♦
Force and Motion ♦ Forms of Energy ♦ Lab Equipment ♦
Measurement Tools ♦ Periodic Table ♦ Properties of Matter ♦ Reflection and Refraction ♦ Scientific
Method ♦ Simple Machines ♦ States of Matter ♦ Waves Space Science ♦ Solar System ♦ Constellations ♦ Moon Phases ♦ Life Cycle of Stars
This product includes the following 16 topics: ♦ Atomic Structure ♦ Circuits ♦ Electricity and Magnetism ♦ Electromagnetic Spectrum ♦ Elements, Compounds, and Mixtures ♦
Force and Motion ♦ Forms of Energy ♦ Lab Equipment ♦
Measurement Tools ♦ Periodic Table ♦ Properties of Matter ♦ Reflection and Refraction ♦ Scientific
Method ♦ Simple Machines ♦ States of Matter ♦ Waves
Diverse charting types and
methods force us to apply
measurements that are often dependent upon the software or service that we use.
Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations in the climate record and
methods for smoothing temporal data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative
forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7
measurements).
I think it is over the heads of Myron Ebell's intended audience, however, and it may be necessary to write an overview — at high - school level — that explains the relative value of inductive and deductive
methods in science, use of multi-compartment models in general, the sorts of problems they regularly entail (formulation,
measurement, n - body calculation, brute -
force computer simulation, experimental repetition, real - world validation, emergent properties, catastrophic regime - shift, assignment of probabilities, etc.) and how these are variously or provisionally overcome, according to the science you are practicing.
My understanding is that a uniform prior in S (and hence, equivalently, a 1 / Y ^ 2 prior in Y) would be the correct uninformative reference prior (that which has least effect on the posterior PDF) if way stayed with Forster & Gregory's OLS regression
method to estimate Y, if and only if the magnitude of the errors in
measurements of the surface temperature were much less than combined errors in the
measurements of
forcings and net radiative balance, the opposite of what Forster & Gregory's error analysis showed.