«You can imagine, if we illuminate the device with one polarization of light, it will create
a force of a particular kind,» said Ambrosio.
Not exact matches
There is in short a way
of appropriating oneness that very effectively rules out any
kind of diversity, dialectic, or even dialogue, and lends itself, for that purpose, especially to those persons and
forces within the community whose power is great enough to sustain their own
particular version
of Christian unity.
Whether or nor
particular quanta considered in this
kind of an explanation are capable
of further analysis, or yet other sorts
of forces (and quanta) are subsequently discovered, is not, after all, the most significant point.
This is not an explicitly genital mode
of contact, but it is a way
of sexual living that makes its appeal to those who by religious vocation (e.g., monks and nuns) or a call to a
particular kind of human service (e.g., Dag Hammarskjold) or some necessity (e.g., those who can not find a life partner or a homosexual comradeship available) are
forced to live without a genital way
of being sexual.
If the ambition is broader, and this in fact a science - fiction - laced exploration
of life under some
kind of miscellaneous totalitarian dictatorship and the homogenisation
of mankind, then you'd be
forced to concede that the film fails to ignite that
particular political powder - keg.
In these
particular paintings, the motivating
kind of force was the idea
of Salomé, which led to a certain
kind of figure, primarily a female figure.
That is because when you are confronted with an object in which you are a bit unmoored, it does not render itself for a
particular kind of legibility, or the opacity
of it has a
kind of prevailing
force on you the viewer.
My bigger point is that it's
kind of silly suggest that a
particular forcing (CO2 in this article) is «de minimis» without considering the magnitude effect
of other recognized
forcings and internal variability.