Sentences with phrase «force used against»

But it has to appear to be to unlawful, which is to say, you have to reasonably believe that the force used against the victim is unlawful.

Unnecessary force used against #asylumseekers - Read more at: goo.gl / CRPkjn For advice: goo.gl / PMjY5Q

Amendments to the criminal justice and immigration bill announced yesterday widen the understanding of when force used against criminal activity is judged to be «reasonable».

«It can not be force used against the territorial integrity or political independence of another State because the actor State is merely occupying its own territory.»

Jennings relied on the UN Charter definition of aggression as force used against the territorial integrity or political independence of a state.

Not exact matches

In doing so, he goes up against Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) using the force in an extremely clever way.

Therefore the salesperson must be a passive yet firm presence against the force used by the difficult customer, reminding himself that the customer feels out of control and is trying to gain control.

There's no good that could come out of police using force against indigenous peoples and others who are protesting,» said DeCarlo, who is also a former police chief.

In February, Reuters reported that a surge in violence against Uber drivers in Brazil last year was forcing executives to rethink the use of cash payments and admit they had underestimated security risks here.

And as a nice side - effect, it provides protection against Distributed Denial of Service attacks (DDoS), the most common brute force method that bad guys use to take a website down, by simply routing web traffic around the stoppage.

The city is weighed down with debt, billions in unfunded pension obligations, declining credit ratings, a police department often accused of using excessive force against African - Americans, a rising tide of murders, and a host of other troubles.

After four years using VieVu's body cams, the OPD reports a significant reduction in use of force against civilians.

But these forces were not used at that time and were instead sent to northern Mexico to conduct operations against drug trafficking when the Mexican government started to work more closely with the United States to fight the so - called war on drugs.

Kim also reaffirmed that he would not use military force against the South and raised the need for an institutional mechanism to prevent unintended escalations, Yoon said.

Those better rates, Stoller said, could allow Amazon to force smaller retailers to use their Amazon fulfillment services — and if retailers don't, then Amazon can discriminate against those retailers in the marketplace, crushing the competition.

Uprooted trees and widespread flooding blocked many highways and streets across the island, creating a maze that forced drivers to go against traffic and past police cars that used loudspeakers to warn people they must respect a 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew imposed by the governor to ensure everyone's safety.

Instead, they will be used to protect against the sub-optimal arrangements that would be forced upon them as public companies.

«The grand jury's decision does not negate the fact that Michael Brown's tragic death is part of an alarming national trend of officers using excessive force against people of color, often during routine encounters.

Main Anthony Arend interviewed on the use of force against the Islamic State»

In these pages, papal biographer and theologian George Weigel rejects the notion that any thinking about just war ought to begin with a «presumption against the use of force,» as it seems Pope Francis has done.

The word you use «force» would be against the law should someone tie you up and beat you into belief.

Perhaps more disturbingly, it found a pattern of police using excessive force against people with mental illnesses, with little or no follow - up investigation in such instances.

When the winds of doctrine try to blow our beliefs to the ground, we turn our open hand into them, using their ideas to force our beliefs more firmly against the hand.

Governmental use of force against religious groups was up also: 42 percent of countries used force against a religious group between 1 and 200 times in 2015, up from 30 percent in 2014.

The «presumption against war» is sometimes expressed as a presumption against violence, with violence defined as any use of lethal force.

The Wahhabi movement in Arabia was a reaction against the worship of saints, but it made use of force rather than arguments, and failed to establish a general reform.

In 1945 Henry L. Stimson, secretary of war, recommended to President Truman the use of nuclear weapons against Japan to hasten the end of the war and save the Allied forces an estimated 1 million casualties in an assault upon mainland Japan.

Sometimes religion can be used by the patients as an effective defense against facing their problems realistically, but at other times it can be a powerful motivating and integrating force.

The use of force against those who did not share the Christian faith, be they pagan, Muslim or Jewish, was taken for granted by almost all Christians at the time.

Some will use the above to argue against paying the preacher, the problem with that position however is that it forces the preacher into serving two masters.

Since the beginning of last week, ISIS has taken thousands of people hostage from the outskirts of Mosul into the main parts of the city, and United Nations officials fear that the plan is «to use them as human shields against the Iraqi forces advance on Mosul.»

The idea that Catholic just war teaching begins with a «presumption against war,» more recently phrased as «a strong presumption against the use of force,» first appears in the United States bishops» widely read 1983 pastoral letter, The Challenge of Peace.

Of course there were others at the same time making similar claims, just as President Carter made them a decade later in the context of another debate over the justness of the United States» use of force against Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Recovery of that which has been wrongly taken and punishment of evildoing are not explicitly named as justifications for the use of armed force by states in international law, but arguably they have been subsumed into the concept of self - defense: the former being recast as defense against an armed attack still in progress, as in the recovery of Kuwait from Iraq in 1991, the latter being recast as the right of retaliation.

These are pseudo-virtues, which you try to shame us into accepting, by directing a polemic against the Church, whose moral force is due simply to its use of certain radical chic cliches that we were all taught to grovel before back in the 1960s.

It is, at least, apparent that the debates about humanitarian intervention by military force in the last decade, about the creation of international criminal tribunals in a number of cases, about the idea of a state's «universal jurisdiction» in cases of violations of the Genocide Convention or other «crimes against humanity,» about how far the global war on terror may proceed without violating the rights of states, and most recently, about the United - States - led use of force against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, have all raised important points of positive and customary international law, and that in every one of these cases the outcome remains unsettled.

And Roach's references to the Middle East carry the message that he assumed that the use of force against Saddam Hussein's military would produce a regional conflagration.

But though Article 2 of the Charter sought to outlaw any use of armed force between or among states except in defense against aggression, it did not clearly define what counted as aggression — a matter that remains unsettled, as the recent debate over what counts as legitimate preemption testifies.

The Hebrew Scriptures take for granted the use of force in implementing earthly rule and defending the nation against external threats.

A law against blasphemy is the absolute best indicator that you can not substantiate your beliefs with good reasoning and instead must rely on a cowardly and primitive use of force.

Sorry Terry, but no where in any of the accounts of Jesus clearing the temple in the Gospels does it show Jesus using «violent» force, and it only shows him using physical force against non-human objects.

Whatever it is called, it is the unlimited right to the private use of lethal force against innocent human beings.

But there is no record that they ever resorted to force of arms to settle their disputes or that they ever used weapons to defend themselves against external enemies.

The purpose of our Armed Forces is not about building churches and stomping around according to their manipulative and subversive machinations behind the scenes using simple mind - control techniques against our own military's usage of mind - control in training.

The section on just war theory closed with a warm affirmation of the value of a pacifist witness within the Catholic Church, claiming that it shares with just war theory «a common presumption against the use of force as a means of settling disputes.»

But lately the idiots have used the military force to force other one as our democracy, it is such the idiot to against the people's will!

The helmet of salvation is God's helmet which he has given to us, for our use, as His soldiers in this war against spiritual forces.

These are of course broad theoretical visions not to be used, as Bellah reminds us, «as a procrustean bed into which the facts of history are to be forced but a theoretical construction against which historical facts may be illuminated.»

Bush's alliance with Ariel Sharon was based on using massive force and preemptive strikes against terrorism and preferring unilateral acts with which the powerful side can impose its will without the need to negotiate compromises and concessions.

By 1941, he was half - apologizing to American audiences for his use of German: «It is in this language that we have, throughout our lives, fought against the self - glorification of nationalism and... the force of nationalist criminality that is laying waste to our world.»