< - I don't see it as for the money as it is that they are
forced against their beliefs!
Not exact matches
There is a push afoot to
force banks to hold higher levels of capital
against their loans and other assets, in the
belief that more capital makes a bank less likely to fail.
I was
against it because it would have
forced churches to hire homosexuals when it was
against their
beliefs.
There should be no discussion on the matter... it is wrong to
FORCE anyone to pay for anything — ESPECIALLY when it is
against their very
beliefs.
The word you use «
force» would be
against the law should someone tie you up and beat you into
belief.
I don't
force my
beliefs on Mr. Silverman, he shouldn't try to rally a bunch of people
against my
beliefs.
Hostees did it for other reasons, but no need to run a business
against your own conscience when
forced by a godless government to do things
against your own
beliefs!
Employees also pay as well, of course, but what we have here is a company, under the policies approved not just be the CEO but by the board, that is being
forced to pay for something that goes
against their
beliefs.
CNN: Catholics clergymen come out swinging
against HHS regulation Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that
forces employers to cover contraception and abortion as part of preventative care regardless of religious
beliefs.
When the winds of doctrine try to blow our
beliefs to the ground, we turn our open hand into them, using their ideas to
force our
beliefs more firmly
against the hand.
Requiring us as a Church to be
forced to participate in covering birth control plans that go
against our fundamental
belief.
This is about
forcing employers to pay for it, even if it is
against their personal
beliefs.
By the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly
against Islam, I am also
against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there
beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and
force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insane.
A law
against blasphemy is the absolute best indicator that you can not substantiate your
beliefs with good reasoning and instead must rely on a cowardly and primitive use of
force.
the problem is when those people who believe decide to
force their
beliefs on others by codifying their
beliefs into law, discriminating
against their fellows, and insinuating it in to public school curriculum.
We do not have the right to
force someone to pay for imposing our
beliefs against their own personal
belief system.
Forcing the Churches to marry gays
against their
beliefs is only the intrusion and the erosion of our rights.
Black Six — «
Forcing the Churches to marry gays
against their
beliefs is only the intrusion and the erosion of our rights.»
To quote you, «
Forcing the Churches to marry gays
against their
beliefs is only the intrusion and the erosion of our rights.»
Why are you so critical of believers, and so defensive
against them «
forcing» their
beliefs on others, when you are doing the PRECISE SAME THING YOU CRITICIZE THEM FOR?
It still doesn't negate the fact that the RCC has religious
beliefs and is being
FORCED by the government to go
against them.
If they were a medical necessity I'd support the move, but since abstinence is a choice there's no reason to
force them to go
against their
beliefs and pay for birth control when alternatives exist.
In recent years, evangelicals have pushed for greater «conscience protections» for Christians, hoping to keep believers from being
forced to go
against their
beliefs on marriage and sexuality at their workplaces.
I am Greek Orthodox and as such we do believe in birth control, but to
force the Catholic Church to go
against its
beliefs is
against Freedom of Religion in our country After giving over 1,200 waivers this administration chose to
force the Catholic Church to follow its regulations is irrational.
The Government is
forcing the church to go
against their
beliefs.
You can not
force a religion to go
against their
belief, no should any president be allowed to do so.
Mr Phillips, who's being defended by religious freedom charity Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), says he shouldn't be
forced to do something
against his religious
beliefs.
If their
beliefs are
against contraception then providing them for their employees is
forcing them to go
against their
beliefs, it's simple.
Fine then stop giving them tax dollars again all this will do is
force them to close because they will not go
against their
beliefs, which means less health care available which we are going to need desperately.
If you want them to change their ways then that's your opinion, but that is their
beliefs, they shouldn't be
forced to do something that is
against their faith.
Chuchs and schools should not be
forced to pay abortions or contraceptives if it is
against their
beliefs.
No, but they are
forcing Catholic sponsored organizations to purchase contraception products which are explicitly
against their moral
beliefs.
«attack those who have religious
beliefs and then try to
force them to accept something which is
against their core values.»
Sadly, the vast majority of the world is
forced to live in fear from various propaganda's that are put across in our media about all things, including religion, government, and
beliefs that are in conflict or
against our own personal
belief systems or the
belief systems of the masses that are in our general sphere of influence.
2) No one is being
forced to take contraception
against their
beliefs.
It is NOT right for the government to
force ANYONE to go
against their
beliefs.
After the match, Pardew was of the
belief that Palace could have nicked all three points at the end having
forced the issue
against a very beatable Arsenal outfit.
The church was so set
against this idea that Galileo was called before the Inquisition and
forced to recant his
belief that Copernicus was right.
Uninfected humans outside Jerusalem, Palestinians among them, are allowed into the city, suggesting a warming
belief in unity
against a third
force.
Fantasies about Western democracies fighting back
against their murderous Middle Eastern enemies don't come much more blunt -
force than this, with its eye - for - an - eye ethos summed up by its evil villain's
belief that «vengeance must always be profound and absolute.»
You are
forced to pay over $ 1,000 a year to an organization that you think not only doesn't represent you but frequently goes
against many of your core
beliefs.
I don't think we see those same
forces playing out or advancing
against the tenure system in academia simply because of the
belief that in academia there is supposedly a more objective measure of what quality is, as measured by the existing tenure process linked to the meritocracy.
As per a popular
belief, these temples are said to protect the land
against the dark
forces and have been built mostly on water edges and rugged cliffs.
The entire ethos behind State of Decay as a series is to create a comprehensive simulation of a zombie survival tale,
forcing a player to adhere to some narrative the team has dreamt up goes
against Foge's core
beliefs of what it is the team is actually building.
Despite the fact that both the models and the YD hypothesis indicate changes in heat transport can affect the global temperature, and in the case of the YD so dramatically temperatures go
against the
forcing trend, you are steadfast in your
beliefs that it is impossible that any long term trend in heat transport can be affecting modern climate.
I accept that's at the gut feel level, but I can't properly judge whether it stacks up that badly
against the
belief that aerosol
forcing is large compared to greenhouse
forcing at the moment (large = cancels a sizeable fraction of the
forcing).
I sympathize with the view that the government should not
force a citizen to act
against her or his conscience, with respect to religious or other
beliefs, but I'm not sure I agree that civil servants should be allowed to impose their religious
beliefs on the general public — the servants» officially secular employers.