Not exact matches
All they are saying is they should not be
forced to compromise their
conscience by facilitating contraception to women, when these women can get the pill on their own
by simply writing their insurance companies — insurance companies would gladly even pay the shipping of this pils to women, rather than paying for more expensive birthings, pre and post natal care, and even abortions.
The Catholic bishops of the United States have vowed to continue to resist the HHS Mandate, which
forces Catholics and others to violate their
consciences regarding grave issues of the human person and human life
by requiring coverage of abortifacients, sterilization, and contraceptives.
Hostees did it for other reasons, but no need to run a business against your own
conscience when
forced by a godless government to do things against your own beliefs!
«The Obama Administration's obsession with
forcing mandates on the American people has now reached a new low
by violating the
conscience rights and religious liberties of our people,» said Rubio, a Florida Republican.
So high is this God's valuation of human liberty of
conscience that, even though He has launched a divinely commissioned religion in history (in two Covenants, Jewish and Christian), He would not have either of these religions imposed
by force on anyone.
That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only
by reason and conviction, not
by force or violence, and therefore all men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of
conscience, and that no particular religious sect or society ought to be favored or established
by law in preferrence [sic] to others.
An easy
conscience is the unifying
force among the competing anthropologies of modern culture, and they justify this
by the most diverse and contradictory metaphysical theories.
This is the question that must be
forced upon every human
conscience by our increasing awareness of the tide of anthropogenesis on which we are borne.
And then there were bishops like Karol Wojtyła of Kraków, who grasped that the dignity of the human person was the battleground on which «the Church in the modern world» was contesting with various dangerous
forces for the human future; who thought that coercion of
consciences violated that human dignity; and who believed that the act of faith must be free if it is to be true, because the God of the Bible wants to be adored
by people who freely choose to do so.
They are only
forced to stay
by their own
conscience and how it might look to voters if they left.
In a scene where she expects Gurira's general to commit what amounts to treason, Coogler expertly reinforces an amazingly well - crafted theme mirrored in other pairings: the friction between surviving
by force or
by conscience.
This was first established
by the U.S. Supreme Court 50 years ago in Tinker v. De Moines Independent Community School District and even before then in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (which first recognized the First Amendment rights of students
by declaring that they couldn't be
forced by districts to recite the Pledge of Allegiance against their religious and social
consciences).
Their fundamental conviction is that the
conscience of the individual must be
forced to yield to the demands of the collective, as decided
by the authorities who presume to speak for it.
That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only
by reason and conviction, not
by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of
conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.»
[10] «(d) a group shall be considered to form a particular social group where in particular: members of that group share an innate characteristic, or a common background that can not be changed, or share a characteristic or belief that is so fundamental to identity or
conscience that a person should not be
forced to renounce it, and that group has a distinct identity in the relevant country, because it is perceived as being different
by the surrounding society; depending on the circumstances in the country of origin, a particular social group might include a group based on a common characteristic of sexual orientation.