Not exact matches
Although the pentaquark's life span is rather long
by subatomic standards (10 - 20 seconds), it's so unstable that it can be created only
by high - energy
cosmic rays striking Earth's atmosphere or
by the
forces at work within the center of a neutron star.
Even if the
cosmic ray theory is borne out
by evidence, where is the room for it to be anything more than another, and not very significant,
forcing factor?
On the possibility of a changing cloud cover «
forcing» global warming in recent times (assuming we can just ignore the CO2 physics and current literature on feedbacks, since I don't see a contradiction between an internal radiative
forcing and positive feedbacks), one would have to explain a few things, like why the diurnal temperature gradient would decrease with a planet being warmed
by decreased albedo... why the stratosphere should cool... why winters should warm faster than summers... essentially the same questions that come with the
cosmic ray hypothesis.
Perhaps if gun industry spokespeople had a history of claiming their products can't cause harm, or that what appear to be bullet holes in people are actually caused
by cosmic rays, sunspots, volcanoes, internal
forcing, or other natural phenomena, the courts might rule differently.
Even if the
cosmic ray theory is borne out
by evidence, where is the room for it to be anything more than another, and not very significant,
forcing factor?
I always believed that the oceans were an important element in localised weather conditions over the short term but feel that relatively sudden shifts in climate occur through external
forcings such as volcanic eruptions, meteor strike and the effects of changes in
cosmic rays and sun spot activity, which are, unfortunately, all chaotic
by nature and unpredictable.
(e.g.,
by omitting / underestimating major cooling methods like thunderstorms / hurricanes or external
forcing like
cosmic rays / clouds) See also numerous discussions of uncertainty at Climate Etc..
2) Warm or cold is irrelevant because it was during a transition between two quasi-stable climate regimes (glacial: interglacial) where all
forcings (including Milankovitch and
cosmic rays) were made irrelevant
by strong positive albedo feedback.
[1] AR4 Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative
Forcing 2.7.1.3 Indirect Effects of Solar Variability «Various scenarios have been proposed whereby solar - induced galactic
cosmic ray fluctuations might influence climate (as surveyed
by Gray et al., 2005).»
The strength of the magnetosphere is regulated
by the sun (whose activity changes in synchrony with the planets), but perhaps the strength of the Earth's magnetosphere is also regulated directly
by the gravitational / magnetic
forces of Jupiter and Saturn and the other planets whose gravitational / magnetic tides may stretch or compress the Earth's magnetosphere in some way making it easier or more difficult for the Earth's magnetosphere to deviate the
cosmic ray.
He ignores the possibility that decadal variability may be caused
by external
forcing such as
cosmic rays which are known to cause increased rates of aerosol nucleation.