Sentences with phrase «forced upon other people»

I am totally ashamed of other athiests attempting to organize and form a club with preset beliefs forced upon other people.

Not exact matches

The point is not trying to force people to believe the same as the atheist; the point is to respect all people, allow them to live as they believe best, and do not allow people in positions of power or government to force their religious beliefs upon others.
This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So, upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.
In fact, forcing such questions upon other people almost always makes the situation worse.
And yet, in that very forcing of people upon each other, the city also breeds the inescapable notice of crime, filth, and disease» and thereby makes possible the sudden and utter conviction of guilt.
He is «grasped» by an imagined ideal with such force that it becomes an important motivating principle in his life, particularly in his relationships with other people in whom he seeks to produce a similar reaction, as he may or may not do in varying degrees depending upon their preparation for the message.
Please tell me — what atheist or atheist group is trying to «force [their beliefs] upon other people
In their view, books stressing contingency «offer a way forward, beyond the «old political history» and the new «social and cultural history» by a reunion of process and event,» In other words, what Individual people did — perhaps especially people who filled leading public posts — may be as genuinely significant as the ordinary forces acting upon ordinary people.
Matters of belief should be discussed with care and an open view for the thoughts of others on all sides or someday we will live in a society like Pakistan where Ministers get shot for their belief and scharia is forced upon the people.
By the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insane.
This man did nothing but teach people about a religion other than the one forced upon them from the day of birth.
And excusing people for their false beliefs that they force upon others by attempting to legislate morality because they are a majority is righteous how?
~ Odd when ppl get frustrated they try to force their frustration upon the other person.
It's sad to see how we, as people, argue with each other over who owns the truth, while our reilious leaders sit back and laugh... Jesus, Moses, Mohammed, Budda all said that we should respect each other, and yet, we are all here saying who is right and who is not... I believe that we should stop using Religion as an excuse to force our own beliefs upon other people... Druids are offically a Religion, simply a different way to believe in God's work, in my opinion... good for them... oh..
Without constantly being told we are going to heII or that we must be evil people who are incapable of kindness and love without a deity enforcing our good behavior we would likely just have more time in our day to enjoy being kind and loving to others as we tend to be with no top down morality being forced upon us.
On the other hand, I do have a problem living in a world where the majority of people are extreme un-realists and non-rationalists, especially when many attempt to force their flawed reason upon all of us.
The problem arises when one person or group states that their behavior is correct and forces it upon others.
Intercessory prayer can best be understood as God's release of his Spirit and healing, creative forces within a law - abiding world, such release being dependent in part upon our willingness to work with him for the furtherance of other persons» good.
«Consequent upon the public confessions of these vicious and notorious killer squad to the killings in cold blood of more than Eleven (11) innocent people in Kwara State and other States of the Federation, the statutory procedure and practice in the Force is that such a heinous crime and capital offence is transferred to the Force Headquarters for further investigation.
Backing his claim with Article 13 of the Constitution which says «no person shall be deprived of his life intentionally except in the exercise of the execution of a sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence under the laws of Ghana of which he has been convicted,» the caucus leader and Minister for Parliamentary Affairs said, «I do not think that the constitution, in so far as a matter is criminal, frowns upon the use of force to the extent that it may even deprive some other people of their lives.
It's an angst - driven piece full of squandered lives of people who are stuck in their stations in life, always dreaming of clawing their way out, but finding themselves forced to be that which they so desperately wish they no longer could be due to the boundaries set upon them by others.
But not for all the usual reasons that people raise concerns: the worry about whether we've got good measures of teacher performance, especially for instructors in subjects other than reading and math; the likelihood that tying achievement to evaluations will spur teaching to the test in ways that warp instruction and curriculum; the futility of trying to «principal - proof» our schools by forcing formulaic, one - size - fits - all evaluation models upon all K — 12 campuses; the terrible timing of introducing new evaluation systems at the same time that educators are working to implement the Common Core.
Based upon it's conclusions, governments have implemented expensive carbon taxes and new overbearing regulations designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, cap and trade schemes, a phased - in ban on incandescent light bulbs, the forced relocation of whole populations of people to make room for carbon credit producing plantations and numerous other far reaching and expensive initiatives.
(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a person is justified in using physical force upon another person in order to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by that other person, and he may use a degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for that purpose.
(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, a person is not justified in using physical force if: (a) With intent to cause bodily injury or death to another person, he provokes the use of unlawful physical force by that other person; or (b) He is the initial aggressor; except that his use of physical force upon another person under the circumstances is justifiable if he withdraws from the encounter and effectively communicates to the other person his intent to do so, but the latter nevertheless continues or threatens the use of unlawful physical force; or (c) The physical force involved is the product of a combat by agreement not specifically authorized by law.
14 (1) Where an institution for the reception, treatment or vocational training of persons who have served or are serving in the Canadian Forces or who are disabled, a hospital, a psychiatric facility, a long - term care home or other institution of twenty beds or more, in which chronically ill or infirm persons reside or where a retirement home of fifty beds or more is situate in an electoral district, a polling place shall be provided in such institution or upon the premises.
An eligible veteran is a person who served on active duty in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, or Coast Guard, and who, (except for a service member on active duty) was discharged or released from active duty under conditions other than dishonorable; or Members of the Reserves and National Guard are eligible upon completion of 6 years of service; or Unmarried surviving spouses of veterans who died as a result of service or service - connected causes.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z