Sentences with phrase «forcible means»

Be wary of trainers who advocate the use of choke collars or methods such as the «alpha roll,» «scruff shake,» or other forcible means of «correcting» the puppy.

Not exact matches

During the Vietnam war, when government officials talked of «regrettable by - products,» they meant civilians killed by mistake; «pacification» meant the forcible evacuation of Vietnamese from their huts, the rounding up of all males, the shooting of those who resisted, the slaughtering of domesticated animals and the burning of dwellings; «incursion» meant another invasion of another country; creating a «sanitized belt» meant forcibly removing all the inhabitants of the area being «sanitized,» cutting down the trees, bulldozing the land and erecting «defensive positions» with machine guns, mortars and mines.

«Targeting» means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball.

Murder in commission of offences 230 Culpable homicide is murder where a person causes the death of a human being while committing or attempting to commit high treason or treason or an offence mentioned in section 52 (sabotage), 75 (piratical acts), 76 (hijacking an aircraft), 144 or subsection 145 (1) or sections 146 to 148 (escape or rescue from prison or lawful custody), section 270 (assaulting a peace officer), section 271 (sexual assault), 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm), 273 (aggravated sexual assault), 279 (kidnapping and forcible confinement), 279.1 (hostage taking), 343 (robbery), 348 (breaking and entering) or 433 or 434 (arson), whether or not the person means to cause death to any human being and whether or not he knows that death is likely to be caused to any human being, if

In Bringing them home, HREOC recommended: That, for the purposes of responding to the effects of forcible removals «compensation» be widely defined to mean «reparation»; that reparation be made in recognition of the history of gross violations of human rights; and that the van Boven principles guide the reparation measures.

The current debate about forcible removal policies has meant that we have been unable to transcend a dialogue grounded in the beliefs and assumptions that underpinned society at the time the policies were in place.