The traditional global mean radiative forcing provides no information about this regional structure, so many researchers have begun to present estimates of radiative
forcing on a regional scale as derived from models or observational campaigns.
Not exact matches
The study demonstrates the importance of understanding how climate variability
on a
regional scale may at least temporarily obscure larger
forces acting
on the global climate system.
But since we seem to have determined that global mean temperatures do tend to track global mean
forcings, the interesting science is now in determining the
regional scale at which we can still make useful statements — and whether a
forcing is «first order» or not will depend quite crucially
on what the
scale is.
Pressing the frontiers of climate science and related research is vital, but it's wishful thinking to expect further science to substantially narrow uncertainties
on time
scales that matter when it comes to
regional or short - term climate forecasting, the range of possible warming from a big buildup of carbon dioxide, the impact of greenhouse
forcing on rare extremes and the like.
The suggestion that skillful decadal forecasts can be produced
on large
regional scales by exploiting the response to anthropogenic
forcing provides additional evidence that anthropogenic change in the composition of the atmosphere has influenced the climate.
To present
regional multi-decadal climate projections to the impact communities as part of their driving
forces and boundary conditions (for their models and process studies), when there is NO skill
on this time
scale at predicting changes in climate statistics, is a serious misleading application of the scientific method.
My bottom line is that while the global climate models, when run with added CO2 and other greenhouse gases, show that this is a warming effect, they are inadequate tools to assess the consequences of these human climate
forcings on the
regional and local
scale.
It is not the pure prediction of the (
regional) trends that is aimed for (type 4), but the occurrence of certain (relevant) weather types conditioned
on an assumed change in the large
scale forcing.
«Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic
forcing has had a detectable influence
on extreme temperatures that have impacts
on human society and natural systems at global and
regional scales»
In response to the finding that anthropogenic aerosols create a significant perturbation in the earth's radiative balance
on regional scales, ESRL / GMD expanded its aerosol research program (1992) to include aerosol monitoring stations in regions where significant aerosol
forcing was expected.
Special emphasis will be
on climate
forcings and feedbacks from global to
regional scales.
However,
regional variations are expected because of greater climate «noise» (unforced variability)
on small
scales, possible
regional climate
forcings, and known mechanisms that affect the large
scale spatial variation of global warming.
Unfortunately, the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment did not sufficiently acknowledge the importance of these other human climate
forcings in altering
regional and global climate and their effects
on predictability at the
regional scale.»
The climate of the coming decades
on regional and global
scales is going to be influenced by both anthropogenic
forcing and internal («natural») processes.