Sentences with phrase «forcings over the same period»

Until you can provide one, one that explains why the known forcings over the same period of time had no affect on temperature, they are meaningless.

Indeed the biggest changes by far — much bigger than changes in calculated greenhouse gas forcing over the same period — in all the instruments is SW.

The study includes an estimate of the effect of the observed stratospheric water decadal decrease by calculating the radiation flux with and without the change, and comparing this to the increase in CO2 forcing over the same period.

Not exact matches

Even more startling, over 350,000 young workers left the labour force entirely over that same period.

This tracks Senator Schumer's movement pattern over the same period, showing that the national political trend is the moving force.

Look at the difference between Scenario B and C. Despite the large difference in forcings in the later years, the long term trend over that same period is similar.

By contrast, the percentage of Latino teachers has doubled substantially over the same period — from 11.5 percent to 20.2 percent of the teaching force.

Post # 70 was suggesting that CO2 emissions followed an exponential course over a long period, and that therefore the corresponding forcing was linear over the same period (at least since the early 20th century, as this was a response to # 68).

Look at the difference between Scenario B and C. Despite the large difference in forcings in the later years, the long term trend over that same period is similar.

By way of comparison, this forcing was 12.5 times greater than the surface forcing alleged by the IPCC from increased CO2 over the same period.

This was my mental equation dF = dH / dt + lambda * dT where dF is the forcing change over a given period (1955 - 2010), dH / dt is the rate of change of ocean heat content, and dT is the surface temperature change in the same period, with lambda being the equilibrium sensitivity parameter, so the last term is the Planck response to balance the forcing in the absence of ocean storage changes.

«The forcing should not balance the ocean heat content increase, and it should apply over the same period anyway (1955 - 2010) which 1.6 W / m2 doesn't.»

Which is just to say that the variation in anthropogenic forcing over the last few decades (and the next few decades) is several order of magnitude larger than the change in Milankovitch forcing over the same short period.

The model's GMST response to the (negative) LU iRF forcing over the historical period, relative to what it would have been if the same forcing had been caused by changing the CO2 concentration (its transient efficacy), was almost four.

You run your models with only natural forcing over that same time period.

The RCS standardized chronologies of TRW (red) and MXD (blue) were forced to have the same mean and standard deviation over the period ad 500 — 1500.