This would mean a deficit of about $ 38.5 billion for 2010 - 11, nearly $ 7 billion lower than
forecast by the Finance Department of $ 45.4 billion in the October update.
Not exact matches
Part of the reason, we believe, is due to lack of consistency and reconciliation between the Estimates, prepared
by the Treasury Board and the
forecast of direct program expenses, prepared
by the
Department of
Finance.
This failure can be attributed to the assumption made each year
by the
Finance Department that interest rates would decline over the
forecast period.
It appears that either the
Department of
Finance is unable to
forecast direct program expenses, or the Minister of
Finance has adopted the previous government's approach of ensuring that his deficit targets are met or bettered
by «hiding» extra prudence in his budget
forecasts — an approach he criticized the previous government for.
This large difference leads to two conclusions: first, fiscal
forecasting by the
Department of
Finance has lost all credibility, and second, the Government is on track to meet its balanced budget commitment for 2015 - 16 if not sooner.
We have recommended, in the past, that you use the
Department of
Finance's
forecast, in part because the
Department has greater expertise, and in part because the
Department's
forecasts have been shown to be more accurate
by independent reviewers.
Until more details are provided
by the
Department of
Finance and / or contained in the upcoming Public Accounts, it is difficult to assess what factors accounted for lower - than -
forecast direct program expenses.
The Conservatives were quick to use this as proof that they were on track to post a surplus in 2015 - 16, despite a warning
by the
Department of
Finance that early fiscal results are not reliable in
forecasting results for the year as a whole.
During the 1990s and early 2000s, when projections of the budgetary balance were off
by wide margins, the credibility of the
Department of
Finance's
forecasting abilities came under attack from both inside and outside the government.
Although E&Y recommended that the
Department of
Finance should establish a mechanism to increase the distance between the economic and fiscal
forecasts presented in the budget and the political process,
by either having the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Finance engage a panel of independent reviewers to critique the government's economic and fiscal
forecasts or alternatively establish an independent agency to provide the economic and fiscal
forecast.
Given the ending of most of the Economic Action Plan stimulus spending in 2011 - 12, one would have expected a significant decline in «other transfer expenses» between 2010 - 11 and 2011 - 12, much more than the $ 1.1 billion
forecast by the
Department of
Finance.
Instead, the government at that time decided to use the average of private sector economic
forecasts rather than those produced
by the
Department of
Finance even though E&Y had concluded that the
Department's economic
forecasts were consistently better than those in the private sector.
A «Contingency Reserve» was first included in the budget
forecasts in 1994
by Finance Minister Paul Martin, following a review of the
Department of
Finance's economic and fiscal
forecasts by Ernst and Young.
It is the latest of a series of over-optimistic
forecasts from the
department, which was set up
by Osborne to provide independent assessment of national
finances.
Demonstrated effective communication and teamwork skills
by engaging in constant communication within the
finance department and researched through banks of data to develop product
forecasting for the company