Sentences with phrase «foreign air transportation1»

Delta Airlines (Atlanta, GA) 11/1991 — 09/2006 In - Flight Board Leader • Managed and trained 15 flight attendants in daily operations and industry best practices • Responsible for in - flight service and adherence to domestic and foreign air travel regulations • Provided exceptional customer service resulting in a positive client experience • Oversaw employee and client relations resolving issues in a timely and professional manner • Performed all duties with positivity, integrity, and dedication to client service

Core Competencies Aviation Security Operations • Customer Service / Support • Behavioral Detection • CCTV Monitoring Desktop Publishing • Security Trends • Staff Training • Negotiation • Investigative Analyses • Communications Concession Audits • Foreign Air Carrier Security • Training Manual Development • Incident Management

NUK has been granted a foreign air carrier permit by the US department of transportation which allows NUK to operate flights between the UK, Europe and the United States.

That combination of foreign air with the typical time constraint of a trip seems to often inspire butterflies and googly eyes worth writing home about.

Subscription Rate: $ 30.00 per year, $ 58.00 for 2 years and $ 43.00 for First Class, Foreign Air Mail $ 52.00 Also available The Italian Greyhound - 21st Century about 350 pages filled with pictures and all the information you'd ever want to know about IGs.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service by Asiana Airlines, Inc., (Asiana) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), between Guam (a U.S. territory), Saipan in the Northern Mariana Islands (a U.S. commonwealth), and various cities in the United States, by way of Seoul, Republic of Korea.

This consent order concerns violations by Swift Jet, Inc., (Swift Jet) of 14 CFR 212.9 (b), the Department's prior authorization requirement rule for foreign air carriers.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service by Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., (KAL) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), between Guam (a U.S. territory) and Saipan in the Northern Mariana Islands (a U.S. commonwealth) and cities in the United States, by way of Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Although, under Part 205, it is the ultimate responsibility of each U.S. and foreign air carrier to ensure that the insurance information on file with the Department is correct at all times, as a practical matter, a clear majority of insurance forms, cancellation notices, etc., are sent to the Department directly by the insurer (or its representatives).

This consent order concerns unlawful conduct by Private Air, Inc., (Private Air) in which the company held itself out as a direct air carrier, 1 when it was not, and engaged in foreign air transportation as an indirect air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 41301.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service by All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd., (ANA) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), between Guam, a U.S. territory, and cities in the United States, by way of Japan.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service by China Airlines, Ltd., (CAL) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), between various cities in the United States and Guam, a U.S. territory, by way of Taipei.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service by Japan Airlines Company, Ltd., (JAL) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), between Guam (a U.S. territory), Saipan in the Northern Mariana Islands (a U.S. commonwealth), and various cities in the United States, by way of Japan.

When evaluating these applications, we normally engage in a two - step analysis of foreign air transportation agreements submitted for our approval.

This order concerns violations by Alia - Royal Jordanian Airlines (Royal Jordanian) of the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382), with respect to filing annual reports detailing disability - related complaints that the foreign air carrier received from passengers in calendar years 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Major U.S. and foreign air carriers may, under 49 U.S.C § § 41308 - 41309, request a grant of immunity from the U.S. antitrust laws to operate certain commercial alliances.

This consent order concerns unauthorized foreign air transportation by WestJet in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and 14 CFR Part 212, arising from WestJet's operating of unauthorized codeshare flights marketed by another foreign air carrier without obtaining proper authority from the Department.

Title: OST Form 6411 - U.S. Foreign Air Carriers Certificate of Insurance under 14 CFR Part 205 Link: https://www.transportation.gov/policy/aviation-policy/ost-form-6411-us-f...

This consent order concerns unauthorized interstate and foreign air transportation by AMI Jet Charter, Inc., (AMI) which, while under the actual control of a non-U.S. citizen corporation, engaged in air services as a common carrier between points in the United States and between points in the United States and points abroad.

In addition, the order prohibits Ronald E. Mays from involvement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier or their agents, ticket agents, and with any other entity directly or indirectly engaged or seeking to engage in air transportation or air commerce or both.

This order concerns violations by Aerovias del Continente Americano, S.A. (Avianca) of the requirements of 14 CFF, Part 382 (Part 382), with respect to filing annual reports detailing disability - related complaints that the foreign air carrier received from passengers in calendar years 2004 and 2005.

To the extent the violations occurred in foreign air transportation, the incidents would violate 49 U.S.C. § 41310, which, in part, prohibits air carriers and foreign air carriers from unreasonably discriminating against any person in foreign air transportation.

On June 11, 2015, American Airlines, Inc. (American) and Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas) filed a joint application requesting approval of and antitrust immunity for alliance agreements covering foreign air transportation between North America and Australia / New Zealand.

This consent order concerns Avia Aviation, Ltd., (Avia) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), that engaged in air transportation between the United States and Canada without effective economic authority from the U.S. Department of Transportation in violation of 49 U.S.C. § § 41301 and 41712.

Projects have included research and analysis of the law of executive agreements, treaty denunciation, and dispute resolution clauses in international agreements, writing international technical cooperation agreements, review of legislation affecting international transportation, and review of orders granting license authority to U.S. and foreign air carriers in contested adjudicatory cases.

SUMMARY: This document requires most certificated U.S. air carriers and foreign air carriers operating to and from the U.S. that conduct passenger - carrying service to record and categorize complaints that they receive alleging inadequate accessibility or discrimination on the basis of disability according to the type of disability and nature of complaint, prepare a summary report of those complaints, submit the report annually to the Department of Transportation's (Department or DOT) Aviation Consumer Protection Division, and retain copies of correspondence and record of action taken on disabilityrelated complaints for three years.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service between points in the United States by International Jet Management GmbH, (IJM) an Austrian air carrier authorized by the Department to engage in foreign air transportation1 pursuant to an exemption2 from the permit requirement in 49 U.S.C. § 41301.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service between points in the United States by The Craig Evan Corporation doing business as Flightexec (Flightexec), a Canadian air carrier authorized by the Department to engage in foreign air transportation1 pursuant to an exemption2 from the permit requirement in 49 U.S.C. § 41301.

By engaging in air commerce within the United States after it violated the terms of its authority, Thai Airways also engaged in unlawful foreign air transportation in violation of 49 U.S.C. $ 41703.

The carriage of local traffic for compensation or hire by foreign air carriers between two points in the United States, a practice commonly referred to as cabotage, violates 49 U.S.C. § 41703, which prohibits cabotage except under very limited circumstances that do not apply here.3 In addition, a foreign air carrier that holds out to the public without authorization, either expressly or by course of conduct, that it provides cabotage service violates 49 U.S.C. § 41301.

1 his consent order concerns acfvertislng of air transportation by i iiCX international Airlines, S.A. (TACA), a foreign air carrier, that violated the Department's full tare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 and constituted an unfair and deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition in violation ok 4Y U.S.C. § 41712.

This order concerns the unlawful assertion of sovereign immunity by Thai Airways International Public Company Ltd. («Thai Airways»), a foreign air carrier holding permit and exemption authority to operate to and from the United States, conduct that violated the express terms of its operating authority, 49 U.S.C. $ 41301, and constituted an unfair and deceptive practice in violation of 49 U.S.C. 3 41712.

To the extent that the ACAA and Part 382 violations occurred in interstate air transportation, the incidents are also violations of 49 U.S.C. § 41702, which requires that air carriers provide safe and adequate interstate air transportation; to the extent the violations occurred in foreign air transportation, the incidents would violate 49 U.S.C. § 41310, which, in part, prohibits air carriers and foreign air carriers from unreasonably discriminating against any person in foreign air transportation.

To the extent that the ACAA and Part 382 violations occurred in interstate air transportation, the incidents are also violations of 49 U.S.C. § 41702, which requires that air carriers provide safe and adequate interstate air transportation; to the extent the violations occurred in foreign air transportation, the incidents violate 49 U.S.C. § 41310, which, in part, prohibits air carriers and foreign air carriers from unreasonably discriminating against any person in foreign air transportation.

This order concerns violations by United Air Lines, Inc. («United») of the Federal statutes prohibiting U.S. and foreign air carriers from subjecting any air traveler to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex or ancestry.

This order concerns a violation by Skyservice Airlines Inc. (Skyservice) of the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382), with respect to filing annual reports detailing disability - related complaints that the foreign air carrier received from passengers in calcndar year 2005.

The final rule includes new provisions related to service animal relief areas and captioning of televisions and audio - visual displays that are similar to existing requirements applicable to U.S. and foreign air carriers under the Department's Air Carrier Access (ACAA) regulations, 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382).

This order concerns violations by Austrian Airlines (Austrian) of the requirement of CFR Part 382 (Part 382), with respect to filing annual reports detailing disability - related complaints that the foreign air carrier received from passengers in calendar year 2004 and 2005.

In September 2015, the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (Enforcement Office) conducted extensive inspections of U.S. and foreign air carriers» operations at 16 U.S. airports.

This consent order involves violations by the foreign air carrier Emirates of Articles 17 and 19 of the Montreal Convention1 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive trade practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712, in connection with monetary claims resulting from damage, loss, or delay to baggage checked on Emirates» flights to or from the United States.

This order concerns unauthorized passenger air service between points in the United States by Aero Services Corporate, S.A., (Aero Services) a foreign air carrier based in France and authorized by the Department to engage in foreign air transportation» pursuant to an exemption» from the permit requirement in 49 U.S.C. § 41301.

This consent order concerns violations by LAN Airlines, S.A., (LAN) a foreign air carrier, of the full fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR 399.84 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This order concerns violations by Israir Airlines and Tourism Ltd (Israir) of the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382), with respect to filing annual reports detailing disability - related complaints that the foreign air carrier received from passengers in calendar years 2004 and 2005.

This order concerns violations by LAN Airlines, S.A. (LAN) of the requirements of 14 CFR 382 (Part 382), limited to the filling of annual reports detailing disability - related complaints that the foreign air carrier received from passengers in calendar years 2004 and 2005.

The Regulatory Affairs Division Administers the economic regulatory functions (e.g., licensing and fares) related to foreign air transportation.

Raised in Portugal, in the fertile lands of Alemquer, I die a refugee, dead from the foreign air and its foul decay, food for the hungry fish in a brutish sea, that crashes against these wild Abyssinian sands, so unlike Alemquer, and so far away

But one of the lawyers involved, Johnathan Smith of the legal advocacy and educational organization Muslim Advocates, told me in an email that he believes the U.S. agency has jurisdiction to ensure that foreign air carriers comply with U.S. laws.

Not exact matches

The A-10 is returning to Afghanistan for the first time since 2012, with the squadron of 12 aircraft to operate from Kandahar air base in the south, the heartland of the militants fighting to oust the Western - backed government and drive out foreign forces.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

Not only did the government fail to ease foreign ownership and entry restrictions in the key sectors of telecom and air transport, it rendered the Investment Canada Act's foreign investment review process more uncertain and less transparent.