Sentences with phrase «foreign award»

There are a number of conventions that facilitate the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards.

Often the best use of foreign award programs is to book domestic flights.

Shelbaya agrees that the Egyptian courts adopt a «liberal approach to arbitration», putting in place «stringent criteria» for the setting aside of an arbitral award, as well as routinely recognising and enforcing foreign awards in Egypt.

Article 235 of the CPC provides for the enforcement of foreign awards in the UAE.

Like I often do with foreign award charts (or missing award charts) I made one of my own that's North America centric.

Member, ICC Task Force on National Rules of Procedure for Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards pursuant to the New York Convention of 1958, 2007 --

This includes applications for interim relief in support of arbitrations (e.g. anti-suit injunctions); seeking or resisting enforcement of domestic or foreign awards under the New York Convention; and challenging or defending awards under sections 67, 68 and 69 of the 1996 Act.

Additionally, in June 2017, Angola officially became a contracting state to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which should make it easier to enforce foreign awards in Angola.

Joaquim T. de Paiva Muniz; Ana Tereza Palhares Basilio / Chapter 9 — Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards / in Arbitration Law of Brazil: Practice and Procedure, 2nd édition, Juris (2015)- 2015

While several franchise films took a tumble this year, there were plenty of great movies that showed true originality, from big blockbusters and foreign award - winners to micro-indies and inventive docs... 10.

She and that film were nominated for a total of 34 awards from around the festivals and foreign awards.

Anyways as for the awards, I feel sorry for Japanese devs to be embarrassed for participating these foreign awards when they see so many American based games participating.

Aline Cavalcanti / Amendments to the Internal Rules of the Brazilian Superior Tribunal of Justice on Recognition of Foreign Awards / Kluwer Arbitration Blog (24 January 2015)- 2015

The Commercial Court («Privredni sud»), in cases involving commercial disputes, or in other cases, the Higher Court («Visi sud») where the foreign award is to be enforced.

He states that, in practice, it can take an average of 120 - 190 days to enforce a foreign award, owing to certain procedural formalities such as the translation and legalisation of awards, as well as providing evidence of notification of the unsuccessful party of the award.

In reality, this reservation is more theoretical than anything else, because codified French arbitration law itself does not contain any such limitation, and article VII (1) of the Convention confirms that the Convention does not deprive parties of more favourable rights they might enjoy under the law of the country in which enforcement of the foreign award is sought.

The Netherlands Supreme Court interpreted Article V (1) of the New York Convention and ruled that a national court enjoys a certain margin of appreciation whether or not to recognize and / or grant leave to enforce a foreign award in the event that one (or more) of the grounds for refusal listed in that treaty provision is present.

In order for a party to enforce a foreign award in the UAE, a foreign award must be rendered in a country that is also a signatory to the NYC (or other convention that the UAE is also signatory to).

Some foreign practitioners have had the perception that UAE courts are reluctant to recognize and enforce awards in general, and in particular, foreign awards under the NYC.

However, just as the courts in other signatories to the NYC, the UAE courts are willing to enforce foreign awards.

Finally, if a party seeking enforcement prefers to base its request for enforcement on the court's domestic law on enforcement of foreign awards or bilateral or other multilateral treaties in force in the country where it seeks enforcement, it is allowed to do so by virtue of the so - called more - favourable - right provision of Article VII (1).

A party seeking enforcement of a foreign award needs to supply to the court (a) the arbitral award and (b) the arbitration agreement (Article IV).

In the meantime, foreign awards are not automatically recognised, and must go to the Angolan Supreme Court for consideration.

Both countries enforce awards as they do court judgments, while non-compliance can be tackled through the courts, which so far has been largely supportive of arbitration and the enforcement of foreign awards.

Without the SPC's final approval, local courts are not allowed to decide against a foreign - related arbitral agreement, a foreign - related award or a foreign award.

Sections 24 (a) and 31 (4)(b) of the IAA deal with different situations — section 24 (a) provides that the Singapore High Court may set aside an award if the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption, while section 31 (4)(b) provides that the Singapore High Court may refuse to enforce a foreign award if such enforcement would be contrary to the public policy of Singapore.

The amendments (ss.2 (e) and 47) confer jurisdiction to hear all questions relating to international commercial arbitrations, including applications for the enforcement of foreign awards, to the High Courts (i.e., the highest court in each state).

Section 46 (b) of the Arbitration Law provides that the court may refuse to recognise and enforce a foreign award, if any of the following in submission for recognition and enforcement of foreign award can be proved by the respondent:

Section 45 of the Arbitration Law provides that the party seeking to enforce a foreign award must produce to the court:

The ten - year period compares favourably with the respective limitation periods in Canada's major trading partners and recognizes that foreign awards are akin to foreign judgments, which are generally subject to a ten - year limitation period across Canada.

It is submitted that if this court comes to the conclusion that Part I is applicable in the facts of this case, no grounds are made out for impugning the foreign award even under section 34 of the Act and thus petition under section 34 deserves to be rejected as not maintainable or in the alternative on the merits and the petition filed by the claimant for enforcement of the foreign award deserves to be allowed.

Learned senior counsel submits that the objection of the respondent that the learned arbitrator was biased or his conduct gave any rise to the apprehension of bias on such grounds is totally frivolous and in any event is not a ground available under section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for opposing enforcement of the foreign award.