To what extent do businesses experience costs, difficulties, inefficiencies or lost opportunities as a result of differences between Australian and
foreign contract law?
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our
contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other
foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply
contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental
laws, such as U.S. export control
laws and U.S. and
foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other
foreign anti-bribery
laws such as the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental
laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax
law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in
foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other
foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with
foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other
foreign laws, and domestic and
foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other
foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other
laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party
contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Cambridge Analytica secured
contracts for US elections that were served by the UK - based SCL, despite the possibility that its use of data scientists with
foreign citizenship was a violation of campaign finance
laws.
Consistent with the Hoover Report's recommendations that the United States had to reconsider «long - standing American concepts of fair play» and «learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies,» the shadow government built alliances between U.S. government officials, the Mafia, and international drug cartels; assassinated many thousands of civilians in Southeast Asia; carried out or attempted assassination of
foreign leaders; trained death squads and secret police forces; worked to shore up unpopular dictators like the Shah of Iran and the Somoza dictatorship in prerevolutionary Nicaragua; worked to destabilize «unfriendly» governments such as Allende in Chile and the Sandinistas in Nicaragua; cooperated with the Colombian drug cartel to plot the assassination of the former U.S. ambassador to Costa Rica, Lewis Tambs, with the intention of justifying a U.S. invasion of Nicaragua by blaming his death on the Sandinistas;
contracted with the Reagan administration and the National Security Council to find ways of circumventing a congressional ban prohibiting aid to the contras, including the trading of arms to Iran in exchange for hostages and money for the contras; illegally shipped weapons from the United States to the contras and allowed returning planes to use the same protected flight paths to transport drugs into the United States; 11 targeted the U.S. people for disinformation campaigns; and helped prepare contingency plans for declaring a form of martial
law in the United States that would have formally suspended constitutional freedoms.
Until recently, employers were not forced to act as
law enforcement personnel because the hiring of workers» whether native or
foreign - born» was rightly regarded as an aspect of the employer's legitimate freedom of
contract.
The panel investigated allegations of violations of
law and due process made against Lawal in the award of
contracts under the Presidential Initiative on the North East while it probed Oke on the discovery of large amounts of
foreign and local currencies by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in a residential apartment at Osborne Towers, Ikoyi, Lagos, for which NIA is laying claim.
You may use the Service only if you can form a binding
contract with Company, and only in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable local, state, national, and
foreign laws, rules and regulations.
The effect of this ruling is that even where a
contract provides for arbitration in London and is subject to English
law, if proceedings arising out of that
contract are brought in the court of another European member state, the arbitration in England will have to wait until the proceedings in the
foreign court have been stayed or jurisdiction has been declined by that court.
Although article V (1)(d) moves beyond the text of the 1927 Geneva Convention, it is not as liberal as certain arbitration statutes, which attach even less importance than the New York Convention to the
law of the country where the arbitration took place at the recognition and enforcement stage.854 As explained in the chapter on article VII, 855 the Convention sets only a «ceiling», or the maximum level of control, which courts of the
Contracting States may exert over
foreign arbitral awards.
In Germany it is not permitted to provide in marriage
contracts that they will be governed by
foreign law.
Even if
foreign law applies to a
contract Dutch
law may (partly) apply to the employment situation.
Further, the confidential arbitration proceedings in which David has been involved have frequently given rise to
foreign law issues and disputes in relation to the interaction between the
law of the
contract and the
law of a
foreign state (e.g. in the context of capacity, authority, illegality or force majeure).
He also successfully acted for cruise operator Costa Crociere, convincing a CIETAC panel to adopt general principles of international
contract law instead of applying domestic or
foreign law.
The sale of
foreign land is almost certainly governed by the lex situs and not by the
law of the agreement — why should Ontario care whether the
contract for the sale of
foreign land is or is not recorded in a signed writing?
Another useful foundation for a
contract - oriented LRW problem is the United Nations Convention on
Contracts for the International Sale of Goods («CISG»).130 The United States is a signatory to the CISG which is intended to provide a structure for international
contract similar to that offered by the Commercial Code and UCC case
law is relevant to interpretation of CISG cases.131
Foreign case law is also considered instructive though not binding, 132 allowing an LRW problem to easily incorporate an international convention, foreign law, and domestic law in one fact scena
Foreign case
law is also considered instructive though not binding, 132 allowing an LRW problem to easily incorporate an international convention,
foreign law, and domestic law in one fact scena
foreign law, and domestic
law in one fact scenario.133
Furthermore, a number of American
law schools have attempted to expose students earlier to international and
foreign law, often by adding international
law offerings to the menu of first - year courses.21 Many institutions now include international and / or comparative
law somewhere in their first - year curriculum, sometimes as a free - standing course, and sometimes as an element of more traditional first - year courses such as
contracts, torts, and property.
The
contract provides that any dispute that might arise is to be settled by arbitration in Danubia, a country that has enacted the UNCITRAL Model
Law on International Commercial Arbitration and is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of
Foreign Arbitral Awards.
The Permanent Sovereignty Act limits the rights of parties to access international dispute resolution, which will give investors and their lawyers pause for thought, while the Review and Renegotiation Act forces parties to renegotiate
contracts which contain any «unconscionable» term or subject the
contract to a
foreign law or forum.
A number of risk - mitigating mechanism may be envisaged to manage this exposure, such as obtaining an indemnity from third party licensors or having
foreign law govern the
contract with the customer.
The ongoing representation of a US oil and gas drilling company in US and Venezuelan litigations against the Republic of Venezuela and the Venezuelan national oil company for takings in violation of international
law and breaches of
contract under the expropriation and commercial activities exceptions of the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
Contracts insisting on the application of western
laws and exclusive attornment to
foreign courts are almost automatically destined to fail.
The challenges are the same as the ones raised on a regular basis, i.e. applicability of
foreign law as governing
law; enforcement and implementation of
contracts as well as the enforcement of arbitration awards or
foreign judgments.
This decision has been the subject of considerable discussion among arbitration practitioners: as was discussed several months ago on Slaw, the case raises a number of difficult questions about how international arbitration and Canada's treaty obligations in that respect interact with local procedural
law — specifically limitation of actions — when seeking to enforce the award, and more generally whether
foreign judgments and arbitral awards should continue to be treated, for limitations purposes, as mere
contract debts.
It also enters into play when construing fee entitlement in
contracts having
foreign state choice of
law provisions.
Duarte v Black & Decker Corporation [2008] All ER (Comm) 401 Leading case on the role of English public policy as the
law of the forum in cases involving restrictive covenants in employment
contracts containing a choice of
foreign law; trial of confidential information dishonest copying claim.
Legal claims brought against a Sovereign State or its instrumentalities by a
foreign investor under a bilateral or multilateral investment treaty, or a
contract or a domestic investment
law, require a legal team of the highest international caliber: with great expertise in international
law, a deep understanding of the civil and common
law systems, extensive experience in the various fora and rules under which claims are raised, an enhanced capability to analyze complex facts and industries, broad language abilities, and sensitivity to political and cultural issues in the various regions of the world.
Dominic has provided expert evidence on English
law for
foreign courts, most recently on construction and interpretation of a yacht insurance
contract in Tel Aviv.
• Administrative
Law • Antitrust & Regulated Industries • Asian
Law • Bankruptcy, Reorganization, & Creditors» Rights • Canadian
Law • Comparative
Law • Constitutional
Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy Journals •
Contracts & Commercial
Law • Corporate, Securities & Finance
Law Journals • Criminal
Law & Procedure • Cyberspace
Law • Discrimination,
Law & Justice • Employment, Labor, Compensation & Pension Journals • English & Commonwealth
Law • Environmental
Law & Policy • European
Law Journals • Evidence & Evidentiary Procedure • Experimental & Empirical Studies • Family & Children's
Law • Health
Law Journals • Housing & Community Development
Law • Forensic Economics • Immigration, Refugee & Citizenship
Law • India
Law • Indigenous Nations & Peoples
Law • Insurance
Law, Legislation, & Policy • Intellectual Property
Law • International
Law & Trade • LSN Educator: Courses, Materials & Teaching •
Law & Economics •
Law & Humanities •
Law & Humanities / Legal History (Archive) •
Law & Positive Political Theory •
Law & Society •
Law, Institutions & Development •
Law, Norms & Informal Order • Legal Education • Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility • Legal History • Legislation & Statutory Interpretation • Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution Journals • National Security &
Foreign Relations
Law • Nonprofit & Philanthropy
Law • Property, Citizenship, & Social Entrepreneurism • Property, Land Use & Real Estate
Law • Regulation of Financial Institutions • Tax
Law & Policy Journals • Torts & Products Liability
Law • Wills, Trusts, & Estates
Law • Women, Gender & the
Law • Young Scholars
Law
@feetwet Ukrainian
laws don't allow to be legal
contracts that are written in any
foreign language.
The Oklahoma
law would seem to have banned enforcement of
contracts that chose
foreign law as the governing
law of the
contract.
In this case, the UK branch provided services under
contract to its
foreign subsidiaries, subject to a duty of confidentiality, and that is how certain documents — the disclosure of which would breach the
foreign confidentiality
laws — came to fall within the scope of the s 20 notice.
Does Ukrainian
law disregard
contracts with
foreign entities?
(Among other areas: conflict of
laws, tort / negligence
law,
contract law, insurance
law, crown
law /
foreign government immunity, the
law of infants, and so on).
Instead of getting a «
contract law» problem in
law school limited to the
contract cases discussed in the course, imagine a real - life scenario where the client, in a rental car in a
foreign country, gets involved in a car accident with a diplomat from a third country where the client was drinking and his infant daughter was injured in the accident.
The multi-practice full service
Law Firm advices on all aspects of Property related
Contracts,
Foreign Investment in Property, Real Estate Investment Trusts, Advising on Public Offerings, Civil Litigation, Arbitration, Commercial
Contracts, Information Technology, Intellectual Property Rights and Strategic planning.
First, I argue that investment treaties must be understood as having generated a rudimentary, yet broad,
law of
contracts - governing agreements between states and
foreign investors on pivotal issues, from substantive rights and duties, to damages and forum selection.
Where parties to an international commercial agreement enter into::: Downloaded on - 13/05/2014 23:52:29::: Kvm 73/107 ARBP259.13 contractual dealings, the
foreign element involved in the
contract may be regulated by three systems of
law.