This is because proceedings commenced in England by a judgment creditor for the purpose of enforcing
a foreign judgment against a State do not qualify as «proceedings relating to a commercial transaction for the purposes of s. 3 (1) of the State Immunity Act 1978».
English law recognises sovereign immunity as a valid defence to the enforcement of
a foreign judgment against a State.
«I am not prepared to adopt, as the defendant's argue, a blanket principle that an Ontario court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a common law action to recognize and enforce
a foreign judgment against an out - of - jurisdiction judgment debtor in the absence of a showing that the defendant has some real and substantial connection to Ontario or currently possesses assets in Ontario... No jurisprudence binding on me has expressly placed a gloss on that ability to assume jurisdiction by requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate that the non-resident judgment debtor defendant otherwise has a real and substantial connection with Ontario.»
Not exact matches
Advising a fund on bringing fraud proceedings
against former directors and third parties, and enforcement of a
foreign judgment in the UK.
This caused an undesirable barrier to those wishing to register a
foreign judgment in the BVI
against a
foreign judgment debtor from a non-Part 72 country, who had assets in the BVI.
In other words, how Canada should conduct its
foreign affairs, including the management of its relationship with the US and the determination of the means by which it should advance its position in regard to the protection of Canada's national interest and its fight
against terrorism, should be left to the
judgment of those who have been entrusted by the democratic process to manage these matters on behalf of the Canadian people.»
Interestingly, we also have specific protection
against foreign libel
judgments, so I'll just be focusing on American law.
The
judgment is among the largest ever issued
against a
foreign nation under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, according to a press release by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which represented the plaintiffs with co-counsel Karsman McKenzie
foreign nation under the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, according to a press release by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which represented the plaintiffs with co-counsel Karsman McKenzie
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, according to a press release by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which represented the plaintiffs with co-counsel Karsman McKenzie & Hart.
Finally Chief Justice Hwang noted that «From the perspective of the DIFC Courts, it is not wrong to use the DIFC Courts as a conduit jurisdiction to enforce a
foreign judgment and then use the reciprocal mechanisms to execute
against assets in another jurisdiction.»
If a
foreign court enters a
judgment against someone by default that
judgment will probably be enforceable in the country where the
judgment was entered (or in the case of the U.S. in the state where it was entered with easy domestication to another U.S. state)
against assets in that country.
The way now appears to be open to use the DIFC Court as a conduit court to enforce
foreign court money
judgments against assets in Dubai or elsewhere in the UAE.
Among Mr. Born's recent significant litigation matters are representation of various European entities in the Holocaust Assets and Forced Labor litigations, representation of a major US petroleum company in defending
against efforts to enforce purported
foreign judgments in the United States and testimony as an expert witness in a number of proceedings in Swedish, English, US, Japanese and other courts.
Representation of an international manufacturer of shipping containers in action brought to enforce default
judgment against allegedly related
foreign corporations.
However, the court would review the following four issues if challenged by the respondent: (1) whether the
foreign court lacks jurisdiction pursuant to Taiwanese laws; (2) whether a default
judgment is rendered
against the losing defendant, but the notice or summons of the initiation of action had been legally served in a reasonable time in the
foreign country or had been served through judicial assistance provided under the Taiwanese laws; (3) whether the performance ordered by such
judgment or its litigation procedure is
against Taiwanese public policy or morals; and (4) whether there exists no mutual recognition between the
foreign country and Taiwan.
Ignoring such claims, no matter how frivolous, poses the risk that a
judgment will be entered by default
against the
foreign state and its officials.
Note, however, the issues highlighted below at question 2.7 d) in relation to the enforcement of
foreign judgments given in default and
against defendants that have not expressly submitted to the jurisdiction of the
foreign court, which may affect the amenability of the enforcement action to summary
judgment.
For
foreign judgments rendered in other countries, our firm suggests that it would be better to file a new lawsuit
against the defendant in Taiwan and use the
foreign judgments as a leverage.
Even though the defendant based in Taiwan is served with all the legal documents, like the court notice and summons, in compliance with the
foreign laws, the Taiwan court will accept the defendant's argument
against the default
foreign judgment that the legal documents are not served as per Taiwanese laws.
(1) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2011] EWHC 3381 (Comm); [2012] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 608; [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 162; [2012] 1 C.L.C. 100 — summary
judgment on claims by insurers
against assured for breach of a settlement agreement and of jurisdiction agreements in the settlement and in the underlying policy of insurance — constitution of a fund from which to indemnify insurers
against future loss and damage resulting from continuation of the
foreign proceedings where no anti suit injunction could be granted due to Turner v Grovit and Front Comor — refusal of discretionary stay in favour of Greek court under Article 28 where stay would condone breach of contract.
where a default
judgment is rendered
against the losing defendant, except in the case where the notice or summons of the initiation of action had been legally served in a reasonable time in the
foreign country or had been served through judicial assistance according to the Taiwanese laws;
For example, a
judgment in rem
against an asset outside of England and Wales can not be enforced for the reason that the assets fall outside of the jurisdiction of the English court; however, a party may seek recognition of that
judgment for several reasons, such as defending claims within England or relying on the findings of the
foreign judgment in other proceedings (res judicata).
A default
judgment — which can be multimillions of dollars — allows the plaintiff to seek enforcement of that
judgment against the financial and other assets of the
foreign government held in the US.
Generally speaking, once a
foreign judgment is recognised and enforced, the creditor may request a seizure order
against all the assets of the debtor and the court will hold auctions to sell those assets to satisfy the debtor's rights in relation to monetary compensation.
(4) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2014] EWHC 3068 (Comm); [2015] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 747; [2014] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 579; [2014] 2 C.L.C. 503; [2015] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 54 — relief granted to both insurers and employees and agents of the insurers who were intended to benefit from the settlement of the insurance claim - relief by way of specific performance and injunctions was tailored to the particular circumstances which included the prohibition on anti-suit injunction to restrain the Greek proceedings — assured ordered to execute documents recording the meaning and effect of the settlement agreement (including settlement of claims
against the servants and agents who were third parties to the original settlement) so that the same could be placed before the
foreign court to assist in the recognition and enforcement of the English
judgment in Greece under the
Judgments Regulation.
the person
against whom the
judgment was given was claimant, or counterclaimed, in the proceedings in the
foreign court;
Represented investors and secured
judgment against multiple
foreign and domestic defendants on claims for federal securities fraud and theft.
P. 12 (b)(6) dismissal of his diversity action
against Alan Wofsy, seeking recognition of a French
judgment pursuant to California's Uniform
Foreign - Country Money
Judgments Recognition Act.
A person seeking to enforce a
foreign judgment in Myanmar must file a suit in Myanmar, as plaintiff,
against the
judgment - debtor, as defendant.
In this case, the subsidiary Chevron Canada was served at its registered head office in Ontario, and therefore the court has jurisdiction to consider the plaintiffs» claims
against the Canadian subsidiary, even though it had no invovlement in the
foreign proceeding or the
judgment that was issued
against Chevron Corp..
Also, often, different procedures apply and different limitations apply when a
foreign government seeks to enforce a claim for a money
judgment against a private individual abroad.
Since the proper tests for jurisdiction to enforce a
foreign judgment were met in this case, the Ecuadorian plaintiffs may proceed with their enforcement action
against Chevron and Chevron Canada in Ontario.