MPs argued that the core
foreign policy justification for invading Afghanistan in 2001 - denying the country as a base for al - Qaida - «may have been achieved some time ago».
Not exact matches
As Micah Zenko (an expert quoted in the McClatchy story) notes at
Foreign Policy, these revelations drastically undermine the legal
justification for the program:
If so, that would mke the terrorist the victoms of our
foreign policy, and offer a
justification for their style of fighting.
I know of no realist work interested in post hoc political
justifications for
foreign policy actions.
What's the
justification behind self - sabotaging
foreign policy.
Even if one could say that such treatment reflects some
policy of the various
foreign states involved, or indeed of the United Kingdom, it goes far beyond any conduct previously recognised as requiring judicial abstention... The critical point in my view is the nature and seriousness of the misconduct alleged in both cases before the Supreme Court, at however high a level it may have been authorised... Sovereign states who without
justification and without permitting access to justice detain or mistreat individuals in the course or in relation to their conduct of
foreign relations or affairs have sovereign immunity in
foreign domestic courts.
The court accepted that the unions wanted to ensure that all employers active in the Swedish labour market had to pay wages (and apply other terms and conditions) in line with those usual in Sweden, to establish fair competition on an equal basis between Swedish and
foreign employers, but then said directly that none of those considerations constituted sufficient grounds of public
policy, security or health, and so
justification had not been established.