Sentences with phrase «forgotten about their points»

It is better to forget about points.

I'd forgotten about that point.

I know a few people who've forgotten about their points and who've ended up losing them when they expired.

Tip # 8: While earning 1 point per gallon of fuel at Exxon and Mobil is great, don't forget about the points you can earn for non-fuel purchases.

Forget all about the points and credit cards for a minute and give yourself some time to figure out where you want to go and how you can to get there.

It is generally far enough down the road that most people forget about that point and are caught off guard when they get a bill for an amount, say, 10 times more than previous year.

Not exact matches

Forget about open rates for a second, and push aside those click - through data points.

Don't forget to think about the break - even period, or the point at which you earn back the costs of refinancing through your interest savings.

That advertised rate requires Verizon's auto - pay discount — however, like the two «unlimited» offerings, it requires making payments from a checking account or debit card, so you can forget about running up points on a travel - rewards credit card.

First, don't become obsessed with CTR to the point that you forget about the metrics driving your business.

Very informative article, great that you raised the point about checking whats working, some people do forget about it.

If at some point my brain can't keep up with generating an income from equities then I'd probably switch to an annuity and forget about investing altogether.

Citi ThankYou Points sometimes don't get the same press as Chase Ultimate Rewards and American Express Membership Rewards, but you don't want to forget about them.

There is no point to build something only to destroy it and forget about it.

I'm sorry that you believe one of the world's leading physicists would refuse to seek answers about the universe simply because his collaborators believe in a God (see my point about Harvard if you've already forgotten).

He intelligently applies such truisms to various marketing and public policy issues, but they are in service to his larger point: forget the formation of character and persuading people about whether something is true» the way to get things done is to condition behavior.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

Understandably, emotions run high in discussions about gun control, in part because it's a horrifying subject — we're talking while parents are mourning their dead children, a reality we can't forget at any point.

The writer of a devotional book I read more than forty years ago — a book whose author and title I have forgotten — made an interesting point about the Holy Spirit.

And we must not forget that a quantum - mechanical calculation even on one particular bacterial cell would be incorrect for every other cell, even of the same species — a point clearly made by Elsasser in his conclusions about the heterogeneity of the material with which the biologist has to deal.

«Remenber all scpritures are inspired words from God, my point is, Jesus wants us to be more than religious, but obedient.Jefferson is just stating that American Churches have become more corrupted with its religious practices that they have forgotten about jesus along the way.The church has taken scriptures and have use them according to what is pleasing to themselves.Jesus wants us to forget about what is pleasing to ourselves and follow him, be like him, love him (means be obedient to him) and ignore what we have known as religion.I define religion as jefferson is using in the video as an act of man pretending or decieving himself into believing that he know God and that he is better than others.He shows that by what he know / pratice not really whats in his heart and by serving how we choose which is pleasing to us, so we use God as a vessel praticing holy rituals teaching what we have made tradition and we have a eternal life with God.God created religion in order for us to remenber him and have a personal relationship with him through his son regardless of the many mistakes we have made in the past.We need to remenber God Forgets our past «he sperate our sins from us as far as the east is from the west».

Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?

Not to criticize... but... in point 1, you say «forget everything you know about the church» and then in the same paragraph, you talk about the church being the «body of Christ.»

It was enough to make him forget about what had brought him to that point and to betray the morals he'd always leaned on.

Ok, I did mention it by way of comparison to Society (which, you are right, I forgot about, sorry — I was just trying to point out that legal recognition isn't taken as an absolute).

I put it on high and was planning to stir it about every 45 minutes but I forgot about it at one point and went about 90 minutes without stirring and it burned (I was still able to salvage it though!).

But when there are so many that I completely forget about them until the point that I scroll through all my photos and find sets from a year back, I start to realize it's an issue that needs fixing.

Although it was early morning we were either too rushed at points or they completely forgot about us.

At this point, they just need to forget about their record, and keep playing hard.

Every sport book today is computerized, Back in my day money always moved the line if a player was respected, and if the squares tossed enough money on a game most books would move the line a little, However the big books would just sit and even take layoffs from the small stores, They knew even if the squares got hot in the end the juice would eat em up.Gone are the days when Billy Walters and his crew would move the line 3 and 4 points, I'm talking sides not totals, Forget about what they did to the horseshoe with totals in the NBA, Back then you could catch small non computerized stores with bad lines to begin with, imagine a three point move and the small store or corner bookie is off on the line a few points to begin with, I could catch some game with 6 and seven point advantages, with computers today if you can catch a half or one point advantage your lucky.Even if you know the group moving the line most of these store move the lines on air, when I say air they just watch the screen from D.B. And move the line before they even get hit, Hell even the big stores have the sharps on small limits per call.

Forget everything else... if the game went over exactly as it did, but with the Spurs hitting their season average from 3 (35.2 %, which is about league average), we would have won last night's game by three points (10 made threes for 30 points, versus 4 made threes for 12 points).

@RwRW, exactly my point; we put this game behind us, like so many of its kind in the past and forget about all 3 points.

My point is that there is much more to NYC basketball than the Knicks and I imagine that most NYers would agree that the Knicks are the weak link in the NYC basketball environment (but only because they either forgot about the Nets or don't really consider them part of NYC).

Have to admit i liked this Article as does point out some good things we are doing that i had forgot about like Goal Difference because it is very important, if we stay top of GD then we should be there or abouts come the end of the season.

Forgot to mention a crucial point of my argument about selling.

He was like «Ah, forget about it, we're winning by so many points!»

In recent weeks almost City's enire starting 11 came out talking about Chelsea going to drop points they forgot t focus on the one thing they could control, their own form.

But do yourself a favor and forget to speak about the title until we are within three points next April.

Sometimes when you think too far in the future, you forget about the present and then you lose points.

Get all three points and forget about the westham loss, and the confidence will comeback once again.

Thats a really good point I also forgot about Kroenke.

They are both great managers no doubt, and you have made some points with the transfer dealings that I had forgotten about; but nevertheless - those players of Klopp's did feel the need to move on to a different team in the same league, something Wenger's detractors have often brought up in previous years, when we have had similar situations.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Then he proceeded to forget everything he ever learned about basketball in his entire life and foul a 3 point shooter late in the game.

Arsenal fc would happily give Wenger the extra # 70,000 a week rather than giving it to Sanchez and In all the while that Mr Humbug is still in charge at the club, There's little point in worrying about our star players leaving, since wenger has obviously forgotten what to do with them, anyway.

The guy starts with one point, but by 2nd or 3rd paragraph he's already completely forgotten what he was talking about, and continues on with Wenger bashing.

One more point, you talk about the healthy state of the club but you don't talk about the likes of Danny Fiszman and previous board members who had the foresight to build the new stadium and not forgetting the wonderful support of 60,000 every week and millions of supporters around the world.

Forgot about what happened five years ago, start remembering why we should bag the 3 points instead!

Lets forget about the bad blood history between both sides, and let our main focus be to play well and get that all important 3 points!

I think maybe with the current generation of engines we have forgotten to take care about this point.