Sentences with phrase «form by answering»

Can you fill out an online form by answering some questions such as name, address, email, and others?

Not exact matches

You start by filling out a simple online form to answer 20 questions.

It does this by giving us an answer in the form of an «Information Card» taken from its Knowledge Graph and displaying it right at the top of the results page either above or to the right (sometimes both).

The 20 House Democrats, led by Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia, sent a letter to Miller requesting that he answer a series of questions related to Papadopoulos and his security clearance form.

The question of whether we can harness it for creating anything more substantial than amusing pictures of cats, Shirky writes, «will be answered much more decisively by the opportunities we provide for one another and by the culture of the groups we form than by any particular technology.»

If you don't find the answer to your financial planning question on this page don't hesitate to contact us using our contact form, or by giving us a call at 804-557-0903.

If you have been unable to obtain an answer to your query by contacting a federal government agency directly, visiting a local Service Canada office or their website, please complete this contact form.

Shortening the form by asking different questions over time lets the marketing team provide the sales team with detailed contact files for qualified leads, but saves the lead from having to answer 14 questions when they've only just started identifying a need in the first place.

You can only contact this web broker by email or contact form; that means you can rule out ever getting a quick answer to a question or concern.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?

He answers with exact fidelity to these inward drawings, either by an elevation of his heart toward God, or by a meek and loving regard to Him; or by such words as love forms upon these occasions, as for instance, My God, behold me, wholly Thine: Lord, make me according to Thy heart.

Only someone who overlooks the fact that this answer itself has a real history which is a history of the reality reflected on as well as of the reflection itself, can think that the Church with its principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able to follow directly on the heels of what is new in the changing course of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the Church lag behind events in its theological reflection on morals.

Christianity (not all forms) is the only «religion» I'm aware of which answers differently: It doesn't matter if the good outweighs the bad, even by a ratio of 1 trillion to one; God is holy, and so requires perfect holiness, and the only way to get that is by God giving it to us by grace through faith.

If you ask why this particular collection of just these sixty - six books (or eighty, if you count the Apocrypha), and no others, form the unity which is the Bible, the only answer is that these have been handed down by the Church as its «Scriptures».

If we ask: by what is it manifest, by what is it promised with historical clarity and in created, objective form (and not only in the never absolutely certain testimony to grace of the mind in the depth of conscience) to the world of all ages, that it stands under the mercy and not under the judgment of God, the only answer can be: solely through Christ and his Body which is the Church.

Gary, I understand your argument and heard it made quite convincingly by Andrew Sullivan, but we do wonder, how do you answer the calls for other «forms of marriage»?

By answering «both,» that in no way shape or form is a rejection of the revelation of God in Christ Jesus.

The answer, he believes, is «that we know what «knowledge» is partly by knowing God, and that though it is true that we form the idea of divine knowledge by analogical extension from our experience of human knowledge, this is not the whole truth, the other side of the matter being that we form our idea of human knowledge by exploiting the intuition... which we have of God» (155).

49 Both text and interpreter have been called into question in terms of the answer they have given to the questionableness of existence, which has been given precise form by the text and by our interest in the text.

The answer is, that when things are separately and specifically noticed in acts which, though distinct, are unified and ordered by a characteristic enumerative interest or purpose, the primary contents (sensa) corresponding to the things are caught up in the overarching act to form a whole representation (in the sense of an intentional object) on the basis of which an objective, real, multiplicity intuitively appears.

@Chad «If you want to demonstrate that God is a myth, you need to answer how the universe came into being, how life was first created, and how all life forms as we know them today were achieved via a totally random series of genetic mutations and how that is in harmony with stasis in the fossil record» @hippypoet «I don't really care how we got here nor do I concern myself with the why either» @Chad «exactly» @hippypoet «See, I don't have to answer where, why, and by whom we are here because I don't need to» @Chad «exactly»

@Chad «If you want to demonstrate that God is a myth, you need to answer how the universe came into being, how life was first created, and how all life forms as we know them today were achieved via a totally random series of genetic mutations and how that is in harmony with stasis in the fossil record» @hippypoet «I don't really care how we got here nor do I concern myself with the why either» @Chad «exactly» See, I don't have to answer where, why, and by whom we are here because I don't need to.

It seems to exhaust the theoretical options to say that such an answer must be achieved by reference to either: 1) the categories themselves; 2) the noncategorial aspects of events; 3) both categorial and non categorial aspects of events; 4) some alleged factor (e.g., a God, Platonic Forms, «nothing») other than the categorial aspects of events; or 5) by nothing (i.e., by no alleged factor at all, including «nothing»), so that the ultimate issue is meaningless or at least unanswerable in principle.

You may answer by saying «it's the moral think to do» but using «God» provides a nice quick and dirty shortcut... We just sometimes have to accept the good (getting these dimwits to do the right think) with the bad (religious fanatics who think the world was formed a little over 2000 years ago)...

He answers that one may conceive the mental world behind the veil in as individualistic a form as one pleases, without any detriment to the general scheme by which the brain is represented as a transmissive organ.

A few of the obvious drives that pack us off, daily or weekly or episodically or, for some, in hope, permanently, are fear or even terror in the particular given set of circumstances; the sheer discouragement and exhaustion of facing questions without answer; profound disillusionment — it takes many forms — with the pertinent, prevailing system or systems; deep and bitter contempt for one's own society, bred of the abysmal failure to attain in consistent practice even a semblance of the justice professed and acclaimed; despair — so it was with the college generation of the late sixties — over the formidable obduracy of a political establishment in going its merciless way quite apparently deaf to the cries of anguish of its empathetic and real victims, victims by the tens of millions here and around the world.

The fifth Anga sets forth Jam dogma largely in the form of answers by Mahavira to questions asked by one of the chief of his disciples, but it also gives perhaps the most vivid picture of Mahavira himself and his relationship to his contemporaries to be found in any of the books.

Hebrews 11:3 gives a simple answer for Christians; «By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.»

Richard, his answer simply means that a large number of people that vote for him won't vote for him if he doesn't stand by some form of creationism.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

After considering several forms of such response, Ignatieff concludes by returning once again to the promise offered by democracy, arguing that the ultimate answer to terrorism must be persuasion: «We must be able to defend ourselves» with force of arms, but even more with force of argument.

If we can help you with foodservice or restaurant industry related questions that could not be answered by the content of this website or you wish to get in contact with us, don't hesitate to send your comments by completing our web form below.

It also enabled him, for example, to answer the question of whether he would play safe to protect his lead — a form of behavior that has little place in the Palmer scheme of things — or once again go out and shake the golf course by the scruff of its neck.

Mustafi carried some great form coming into the club, the momentum helped by a large portion of Arsenal supporters treating him as a minor saviour, the «finally» answer to years of apparent defensive weakness.

To help answer that question, here is an excerpt form a recent Huffington Post article written by a colleague of mine, Dr. Jim Taylor.

My answer is no I am not a ref, I am just a 22 - year old Arsenal fan, feeling frustrated and helpless watching our dear club being picked apart by the Referees in every form of competition we play for the past 7 years (as early as I started watching the Arsenal).

By George Capsis Gail Brewer, our Manhattan Borough President, answered The Times editorial endorsing the selling of Pier 40 air rights for $ 100 million to save Pier 40 from collapsing into the Hudson by encasing some, if not all, of the pier's corroding 3600 steel piles, replacing crumbling concrete slabs that form the roof, aBy George Capsis Gail Brewer, our Manhattan Borough President, answered The Times editorial endorsing the selling of Pier 40 air rights for $ 100 million to save Pier 40 from collapsing into the Hudson by encasing some, if not all, of the pier's corroding 3600 steel piles, replacing crumbling concrete slabs that form the roof, aby encasing some, if not all, of the pier's corroding 3600 steel piles, replacing crumbling concrete slabs that form the roof, and

[244] Neil Rose, editor of legalfutures.co.uk, commented that the exact form of News International's waiver means H&L will not be able to declare its innocence but only answer questions by the police or parliament.

Arguments have been made by other answers that making marijuana illegal does some form of harm (you can debate how much, but some minimal amount has been presented)

While we continue that discussion in chat, you still haven't answered the question I asked about your question: are you only interested in the correlation between views of individual Republican voters and their racial attitudes, or are you also interested in whether the views espoused by the Republican Party itself were formed by race?

Speaking today, SNP MP Martin Docherty - Hughes said that this was further evidence of Leave groups working together: «It can only be explained by one person filling out multiple forms for different groups, and making the same mistake... The case that senior Leave members have to answer becomes more serious by the day.»

The National Youth Organiser also revealed that, he has formed a committee, headed by the deputy National Youth Organiser, Salam Mustapha, to monitor comments and statements from the hopefuls and their members, adding that they will answer to any negative comment from them when vetting begins.

He said that the leadership of the party decided to draw up a form to be filled by every aspirant with a question which demanded to know if an aspirant had ever been detained for any case of fraud or had a pending case, this he said Soludo answered «no» to.

In nearly a year there still has not been a single response, not even a form letter (which is the response made by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand — which answered none of the questions posed) or an automated response (which was the best that Senator Schumer could come up with).

The team hopes that an answer to the birds» plight will come through science, likely in the form of new plastics that don't get fouled by DMS - producing organisms.

Micro-mineral analyses of the pebble by the original research team at the University of Johannesburg have now provided unsettling answers that spiral away from conventional views of the material our solar system was formed from.

By the time MPI - CBG reaches full strength in 2003, it will be home to 350 staff and doctoral students working in 25 groups to answer the question «How do cells form tissues?»

ARIEL Press Release (03/2018)-- ARIEL selected as ESA's next medium - class science mission ARIEL, a mission to answer fundamental questions about how planetary systems form and evolve, has been selected by the European Space Agency (ESA) as its next medium - class science mission, due for launch in 2028.

Lee et al. [3] answered this by offering one of 9 complementary food choices in the form of separate yeast and sugar solutions differing in concentration.