This is
a form of selection bias, where you become to believe that everyone is just like you.
Many of them have, of course, already practiced the easiest
form of the selection bias they decry by moving to the lofty suburbs of privilege, even as they fight to ensure poor black and Hispanic families do not have the same opportunity.
Not exact matches
Even by law: the second one is simply rude language (which you deliberately selected, to contrast with equally
biased selection of carefully polite phrase for your side — as if we never hear a rude word from you guys); while the first one is actually a blackmail, despite the said politeness
of the
form.
Results avoid
bias from within - country
selection and are robust to continental fixed effects and to controlling for non-performance-based
forms of teacher salary adjustments.
And I would offer a similar criticism
of that as well, as IMO, you neither ground that
form of analogizing in a scientific manner; as I have told you, I think that your inclusion and exclusion criteria
selection process is quite arbitrary, and I don't think that it is coincidence that it confirms your distinction
of a group you belong to («skeptics») from a group you criticize («realists») in ways that (1) reaffirm a superiority in the group you belong to and, (2) I consider to be superficial and not meaningful as compared to the vastly more important underlying similarities (e.g., the tendency toward identity protective behavior, motivated reasoning, cultural cognition, confirmation
bias, emotively - influenced reasoning, etc.)...
Portions
of water bapor feedback
selection bias, and IPCC internal sensitivity illogic were guest posted here in different
form back in 2011 and 2012.
Besides publication
bias, the results may be affected by other
forms of bias, such as coding or
selection bias.