So, if the oceans absorb 3.7 W / m ² of RF from a doubling of CO2, 86 % of that would be returned to the atmosphere continuously in
the form of water vapour while only 14 % of it (i.e. ~ 0.52 W / m ²) would remain behind to warm the oceans.
Adding some greenhouse gases (CO2) to a near infinite supply of greenhouse gases in
the form of water vapour available to the atmosphere has negligible effect.
[9] The fundamental dispute is about water in the atmosphere, either in
the form of water vapour (a gas) or clouds (water in liquid form).
Now images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope have revealed a large cloud of hydrogen and oxygen — most likely in
the form of water vapour — extending from the moon's south pole.
Not exact matches
Each
of these raw foodstuffs contains some
water, and to heat them up is to eliminate some
of this
water in the
form of vapour.
He says the clumps were probably patches
of ice that
formed and grew from
water vapour freezing onto the leg.
According to the accepted view, the formation
of the Earth released vast amounts
of water vapour and carbon dioxide, which
formed a thick atmosphere and caused strong greenhouse warming at a time when the Sun was 15 to 20 per cent fainter than today.
This process
of smoothing the original
water isotope variations from precipitation is dependent on the temperature, as the
water molecules in
vapour form are more mobile at warmer temperatures.
His results lend support to the theory that the oceans were
formed by
water vapour released from the hot interior
of the young Earth.
The ice in the permafrost
of is
formed not by liquid
water, but by frozen
water vapour; the absence
of liquid
water, makes the soil less likely to be able to sustain life.
i.e. the
water vapour will tend to carry heat (in the
form of warmed air and latent heat) higher in the atmosphere, reducing surface warming.
Sulphur dioxide reacts with
water vapour to
form long - lived droplets (aerosols)
of sulphuric acid, and about 10 million tons
of these droplets are known to have accumulated in the stratosphere as a result
of the eruption.
Given the lower temperatures and lower
water vapour content at higher altitudes and a need for high supercooling to initiate condensation (in the absence
of sufficient normal CCN), wouldn't an increased source
of nuclei, in the
form of GCRs, enhance high - and middle - altitude cloud formation?
When it reaches a level high enough to cool it to it's «dew point» the
water vapour condenses out in the
form of clouds and rainfall and the Latent Heat
of Condensation is released into the upper part
of the atmosphere to accelerate the escape
of radiant energy to space.
I have made simple calculations with a
water vapour content
of 1 % and find that liquid
water has less volume than the equivalent number
of H2O molecules in gas
form.
Additionally, the distortions
of the lapse rate in ascent are greater than for CO2 because
water vapour is lighter than air and contains more energy in latent
form which heats the air around it when condensation occurs during uplift.
It all depends on how much, and a t what altitudes, latitudes and times
of day that
water is in the
form of a gas (
vapour) or a liquid (clouds).
Water vapour is lighter than air once
formed by the acquisition
of the latent heat
of evaporation so no additional radiative energy needs to be acquired to enable it to rise within the Earth's gravitational field.
Based on evidence from Earth's history, we suggest here that the relevant
form of climate sensitivity in the Anthropocene (e.g. from which to base future greenhouse gas (GHG) stabilization targets) is the Earth system sensitivity including fast feedbacks from changes in
water vapour, natural aerosols, clouds and sea ice, slower surface albedo feedbacks from changes in continental ice sheets and vegetation, and climate — GHG feedbacks from changes in natural (land and ocean) carbon sinks.
Water has a residence time of 8 - 10 days in the atmosphere, so whenever it rains carbon dioxide is being washed out of the atmosphere, because, water (vapour, liquid, solid) in the atmosphere attracts all carbon dioxide in the vicinity — together forming carbonic acid which gives all natural unpolluted rain its pH of around 5.6
Water has a residence time
of 8 - 10 days in the atmosphere, so whenever it rains carbon dioxide is being washed out
of the atmosphere, because,
water (vapour, liquid, solid) in the atmosphere attracts all carbon dioxide in the vicinity — together forming carbonic acid which gives all natural unpolluted rain its pH of around 5.6
water (
vapour, liquid, solid) in the atmosphere attracts all carbon dioxide in the vicinity — together
forming carbonic acid which gives all natural unpolluted rain its pH
of around 5.6 - 8.
The globe is indeed a
water world and
water is not featured in the climate models, either in
vapour form in clouds nor in liquid
form through the movement
of currents.
@PMD:
water is not featured in the climate models, either in
vapour form in clouds nor in liquid
form through the movement
of currents
In addition, some particles provide opportunities for the condensation
of water vapour to
form water droplets, the ingredients
of fog.
The second factor is the insulating effect
of the atmosphere
of which well over 90 % results from atmospheric
water in the
form of clouds and
water vapour with the remaining 10 % due primarily from CO2 and ozone with just a slightly detectable effect from methane and a trivial effect from all the other gases named in tyhe Kyoto Accord that is so small it can't even be detected on measurements
of the Earth's radiative spectrum.
Reviewing the IPCC papers, I see that you are right about the feedback uncertainty being more related to clouds rather than
water vapour, although they also state that the precise mechanisms
of water vapour feedbacks are quite complex and the
form its spacial distribution would take is still not well understood.
Aeroplanes also emit
water vapour, chemicals and other substances that can
form contrails, changing the natural formation
of clouds.
As the planet warms, increasing levels
of water vapour in the atmosphere caused by higher evaporation levels
form more clouds and snow increasing the albedo
of the planet, reflecting heat back into space more efficiently, thus working to regulate the temperature downward.
a) The same amount
of water vapour in condensed
form and b) That initial quantity
of air and c) More air and
water vapour imported from the surroundings.
Air containing
water in
vapour form will rise higher than dry air because it is lighter so when the
vapour is removed it must fall back to its «correct» height but because
of the air around it becoming warmer as it descends it will remain too dense for its height until it reaches the ground and receives more energy from the irradiated surface.
i) That parcel
of air can be caused to expand relative to adjoining air parcels either by direct input
of more solar energy where insolation is uneven (as it always is) or indirectly by the injection
of potential energy in the
form of latent heat
of evaporation carried by
water vapour.
However, in areas
of high pressure, with the air subsides,
water vapour does not rise and no rain or clouds will
form.
In effect the evaporation sucks energy from the oceans against the thermal gradient within the ocean bulk and despite the warming
of the topmost molecules caused by infra red radiation and then expels it to the air in the
form of latent heat carried by
water vapour.
The hydrosphere is the collective mass
of water found on, under, and over the surface
of Earth in the
form of liquid
water, ice, and
water vapour.
12 How the Hydrosphere Affects Climate (Page 274) The hydrosphere is the collective mass
of water found on, under, and over the surface
of Earth in the
form of liquid
water, ice, and
water vapour.
Water vapour is a gas whereas water is a liquid and to achieve that change of state a very large quantity of energy gets tied up in the molecules of vapour in latent form which means that it's presence is not reflected in the actual temperature ot the air which carrie
Water vapour is a gas whereas
water is a liquid and to achieve that change of state a very large quantity of energy gets tied up in the molecules of vapour in latent form which means that it's presence is not reflected in the actual temperature ot the air which carrie
water is a liquid and to achieve that change
of state a very large quantity
of energy gets tied up in the molecules
of vapour in latent
form which means that it's presence is not reflected in the actual temperature ot the air which carries it.
Instead it is a composite
of the rates
of evaporation and condensation, melting and freezing and thus the average time that a
water molecule remains in the air in
vapour form, or in the ocean as a liquid or in ice and snow as a solid.
But it was cold this winter and C02 is plant food and only a trace gas and the greenhouse effect has been disproved anyway and even if the greenhouse effect does exist, C02 has negligible impact compared to
water vapour and our only source
of heat is the sun so it must be the sun, unless it is due to the C02 from volcanoes, but C02 follows warming so it can't be the C02 and the medieval warm period was warmer anyway and all the temperature reconstructions that show this not to be true are produced by corrupt scientists being paid by corrupt governments that have colluded to create an excuse to
form a one world unelected social - ist government and even if the scientists are not that corrupt, although the e-mails prove they are, they have still got it wrong as the climate sensitivity is not as high as they think it is because it is basically the planets orbits and cosmic rays so we can say for a fact that the warming that probably does not exist is definatley not due to humans and even if it was the evidence is not sufficient to make drastic changes to the economy and increase taxes so that the politicians and scientists and business leaders get rich and leave us all poor — do they think we are stupid or something?