Just because conduct is not determined by unified intelligible basic principles, but is regulated by
the formal authority of the Law, the task of the scribe is to «make a fence around the Torah,» that is, by endless acute deductions from Scripture to find rules for cases not foreseen in the Law, which nevertheless confront men in their present life.
Not exact matches
This claim can not,
of course, cancel the
formal array
of power — we are a nation governed by
laws and institutions — but there is nothing amiss in reminding those in offices that they can not stray too far for too long from the wishes
of the majority without straining the fabric
of authority in a democratic system.
For its peculiar characteristic is the conviction that because
of the
formal authority of Scripture all the commands
of the
Law are equally binding.
Since this obedience is obedience to a purely
formal authority, in the late Jewish ethic there appears the commingling
of moral and ritual
laws, and the overemphasis on ritual and ceremonial rules, which Jesus denounces in the statement that the Pharisees strain out gnats and swallow camels.
The Old Testament commands to which Jesus opposes «But I say unto you» have for the Jews a purely
formal authority, the character
of law.
The will
of God is the
formal authority of Scripture; ethic is therefore not distinguishable from
law.
Actually he opposes not only a whole group
of Old Testament
laws, but the Old Testament itself as
formal legal
authority.
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question
of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship
of Barack Obama's father at the time
of his birth (irrespective
of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President
of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote
of the College
of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance
formal advice from the United States Department
of Justice Office
of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution
of the United States» as to whether they are governed by
laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight
of existing legal
authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
Pursuant to Education
Law section 16, any person having reasonable cause to suspect that a student has been subjected to harassment, bullying, and / or discrimination by an employee or student, on school grounds or at a school function, who acting reasonably and in good faith, either reports such information to school officials, to the commissioner, or to law enforcement authorities or otherwise initiates, testifies, participates or assists in any formal or informal proceedings under this subdivision, shall have immunity from any civil liability that may arise from the making of such report or from initiating, testifying, participating or assisting in such formal or informal proceedin
Law section 16, any person having reasonable cause to suspect that a student has been subjected to harassment, bullying, and / or discrimination by an employee or student, on school grounds or at a school function, who acting reasonably and in good faith, either reports such information to school officials, to the commissioner, or to
law enforcement authorities or otherwise initiates, testifies, participates or assists in any formal or informal proceedings under this subdivision, shall have immunity from any civil liability that may arise from the making of such report or from initiating, testifying, participating or assisting in such formal or informal proceedin
law enforcement
authorities or otherwise initiates, testifies, participates or assists in any
formal or informal proceedings under this subdivision, shall have immunity from any civil liability that may arise from the making
of such report or from initiating, testifying, participating or assisting in such
formal or informal proceedings.