Scoring Formative Assessments Often, when I do trainings or demonstrations on how to use the Naiku Platform for
formative assessment purposes, I am asked how the assessments are scored and exported to grade books.
Not exact matches
I've written in the past about how embracing competency - based learning could allow us to break the false tradeoffs between summative and
formative assessments and allow us to embrace «moderating»
assessments that would serve both
purposes.
Often called «
formative assessments,» such measures have a
purpose distinct from that of end - of - the - year state tests.
As Heritage (2008) explains, «The
purpose of
formative assessment is to provide feedback to teachers and students during the course of learning about the gap between students» current and desired performance so that action can be taken to close the gap.»
As this trail covers multiple areas of mathematics it gives the teacher an opportunity to make real
assessment of learning in mathematics for both summative and
formative purposes.
This means, as Professor Geoff Masters said his Teacher article Rethinking
formative and summative
assessment, you must «recognise that the essential
purpose of
assessment in education is to establish and understand where students are in an aspect of their learning at the time of
assessment.
The primary
purpose of
formative assessment is to understand where students» skills exist so that we can diagnose gaps (and extensions for gifted), and develop and implement a differentiated lesson that meets each student's needs — and then repeat the cycle.
High - performing teams understand that the
purpose of
formative assessments is different than summative
assessments.
The book includes a description of 75 FACTs (
Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques) that can be used for the
purposes of eliciting and identifying preconceptions, engaging and motivating students, activating thinking and promoting metacognition, providing stimuli for math discussion, initiating mathematical inquiry and idea exploration, supporting concept development and transfer of knowledge, improving questioning and responses, providing feedback, supporting peer and self -
assessment, and reflecting on learning.
As students signal completion of tasks, PROPEL periodically prompts the teacher to review student work for the
purpose of
formative assessment.
This new book for K - 5, features a
formative assessment probe, a
purpose for using the probe, and a
formative assessment classroom technique (FACT) with a detailed description of
formative assessment in practice.
The idea of students and teachers both being involvement in
assessment is crucial because the
purpose of
formative assessment is to improve student learning «while there is still time to act — before the graded event» (Chappuis et al., 2012, p. 35).
The PowerPoint PPT presentation: «The
formative purpose:
assessment must first promote learning CCSSO 35th Annual National Conference on Large - Scale
Assessment San Antonio, TX; June 2005» is the property of its rightful owner.
The
purpose of pre-
assessment,
formative and post-
assessment or summative
assessment is to measure / determine the students» level of competence before, during and after implementing instruction.
They create and / or select
assessments that balance
formative and summative
purposes to meet the information needs of all stakeholders, including students.
Now here's a question for you: Does your learning team prioritize those two
purposes equally — or are you spending most of your common
formative assessment work on one of those two
purposes?
So, for
assessments that are used for
formative or interim / benchmark
purposes, alignment to the standards will require that tests include items that are likely to be taught and mastered early in the instructional sequence as well as, items that reflect the highest levels of mastery for that standard.
In addition, it is important to consider whether the
assessment purpose is
formative, intermediate (benchmark) or summative.
As noted at the beginning, CBM and other
formative assessments were designed for the
purpose of monitoring IEP goals.
A less known part of the history of special education in the U.S. is that certain types of
formative assessments, including curriculum - based measures (CBM) were developed for the
purpose of monitoring the progress of students with individualized education programs (IEP).
Interim
assessments fall between
formative and summative
assessments in both timing and
purpose.
Consider the two primary
purposes of
formative assessment after instruction.
First, formal
formative assessment is defined as being planned in advance, designed with the
purpose of gathering information from all students in the class at the same time, and intended to move students forward through feedback and / or instructional adjustments.
Whereas summative
assessments are tests that evaluate the degree to which students have successfully learned all the material planned for teaching in a given time period (typically, one school year),
formative assessment refers more abstractly to the ongoing process of assessing what students have and have not learned for the express
purpose of adjusting instruction moment by moment to meet individual students» needs.
The
purpose, then, of
formative assessment is not just to determine proficiency on a learning target, but also to collect information from the students about their learning related to this target.
I can remember thinking when I first got started with
formative assessment that its
purpose was to identify students who haven't learned something that had been identified as «essential» that had already been taught.
Around the world, performance tasks, projects, and collections of student work - including the Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate examinations - are used as part of both
formative assessment systems and formal examination systems that carry accountability
purposes.
Ongoing classroom
assessments serve both
formative and summative
purposes and meet students» as well as teachers» information needs.
In the broadest sense,
assessment is a means for gathering information about what students know — from large - scale, annual summative
assessments to interim summative
assessment to classroom - based, summative and
formative assessment (see table below for
assessment purposes and use).
Many researchers have distinguished the difference between
formative and summative
assessment based on the
purpose of the
assessment and the audience.
Formative assessment serves the dual
purpose of giving the teacher information on the effectiveness of the lesson and giving students information on the current state of their learning.
The intent is that these
formative assessments not be used for grading
purposes, but provide both teacher and student with valuable feedback about the student's progress.
Use instructionally relevant
assessments that are reliable and valid • SCREENING: Collecting data for the
purpose of identifying low - and high - performing students at risk for not having their needs met • DIAGNOSTIC: Gathering information from multiple sources to determine why students are not benefiting from instruction •
FORMATIVE: Frequent, ongoing collection of information, including both formal and informal data, to guide instruction
The
purpose of this resource is to help teachers revise existing lesson plans so that they incorporate the
formative assessment process and align with College and Career Ready Standards (CCRS).
If the primary
purpose of
assessment is to support high - quality learning (principle one in Principles and Indicators for Student
Assessment Systems), then
formative assessment ought to be understood as the most important
assessment practice.
A primary
purpose of the data displayed is to facilitate just - in - time
formative assessment for instructional decision - making.
We refuse to allow any data to be used for
purposes other than the individual teacher's own
formative or cumulative
assessment.
«The
formative and summative
purposes of
assessment can be so intertwined that they are mutually supportive rather than conflicting.
Introduction to the Third Edition Chapter 1: A Guide to Action for Professional Learning Communities at Work Chapter 2: Defining a Clear and Compelling
Purpose Chapter 3: Building the Collaborative Culture of a Professional Learning Community Chapter 4: Creating a Results Orientation in a Professional Learning Community Chapter 5: Establishing a Focus on Learning Chapter 6: Creating Team - Developed Common
Formative Assessments Chapter 7: Responding When Some Students Don't Learn Chapter 8: Hiring, Orienting, and Retaining New Staff Chapter 9: Addressing Conflict and Celebrating in a Professional Learning Community Chapter 10: Implementing the Professional Learning Community Process Districtwide Conclusion: The Fierce Urgency of Now
Our content - and research - based approach to
formative assessment is based upon the seminal finding from How People Learn (Bransford et al., 1999 p. 14) that «if students» initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp new concepts and information presented in the classroom, or they may learn them for the
purposes of a test but revert to their preconceptions.»
However, in school districts» drive towards common
formative assessments, there is risk of over-simplifying, yet again, what it means for a teacher to understand student learning — the commonly assumed
purpose of
formative assessment.
Unlike high - stakes testing — which is used for so many quasi-instructional and contradictory
purposes —
formative assessment primarily has a strategic instructional
purpose.
These
assessments can be used as interim
assessments, but they provide a large amount of data about students» strengths and weaknesses and, therefore, serve a
formative purpose as well.
Again, the
purpose of
formative assessment is to improve the likelihood that learning takes place.
Twitter can also be a
formative assessment tool both within and outside of the classroom, and for a variety of
purposes.
Specific to the primary
purpose of
formative assessment is the opportunity for teachers to provide descriptive feedback to students.Rather than providing students with a judgment that identifies an overall grade, score, or level (i.e. summative
assessment), teachers focus on providing specific, descriptive information to students on how to keep learning and growing toward proficiency.
As Heritage (2008) explains, «The
purpose of
formative assessment is to provide feedback to teachers and students during the course of learning about the gap between students» current and desired performance so that action can be taken to close the gap.»