Mr. Bidgood's
former employer appeals, arguing the Labour Board lacked jurisdiction to provide the award.
Not exact matches
Wonu assisted in representing an inter-dealer broker in his
appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal regarding the non-payment of a bonus by his former employer following his resignation to join a compe
appeal to the Employment
Appeal Tribunal regarding the non-payment of a bonus by his former employer following his resignation to join a compe
Appeal Tribunal regarding the non-payment of a bonus by his
former employer following his resignation to join a competitor.
Upholding the judge's finding of liability on the 93A clam, the
Appeals Court held that the
former employer - employee relationship between the plaintiff and the individual defendant «does not stand as a bar» to the chapter 93A claim and that his conduct was «actionable independent of his contractual obligations.»
S.C), an
appeal successfully argued by Daniel A. Lublin, an Ontario Superior Court judge overturned a motion judge's finding that Mr. Hayes was unable to sue his
former employer, Peer 1 Network, for wrongful dismissal, in an Ontario Court.
The Ontario Court of
Appeal recently upheld a decision requiring the
employer to indemnify its
former employee for costs and expenses the employee incurred during an internal investigation and dismissal proceedings for alleged fraudulent misconduct.
«Disability benefits and reasonable notice —
Employer gambles on
former employee's health and loses at Ontario Court of
Appeal» In - House Counsel Magazine (August 2012)
Obtained a $ 1.4 million verdict (upheld after
appeals) for a
former employee who alleged wrongful discharge and failure to accommodate in a disability discrimination case against his
former employer and manager.
The potential pitfalls of fixed - term contracts: In Howard v. Benson Group Inc. (The Benson Group Inc.)[2], the Ontario Court of
Appeal ordered an
employer to pay a
former employee 37 months of salary and benefits following termination — after only 23 months of employment.
In Singh v. Concept Plastics Limited, 2016 ONCA 815 [«Singh»] the Court allowed the
appeal of the respondent
employer dismissing two motions for summary judgment brought by
former employees.
In a judgment handed down today, 28 July 2016, the Court of
Appeal has decided to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice on whether limitations on the compensation paid by the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to
former employees of insolvent
employers are consistent with Directive 2008 / 94 / EC (the Insolvency Directive).
Similarly, in Eagle Professional Resources Inc. v. MacMullin, a motions judge held (and the Ontario Court of
Appeal agreed) that three employees did not breach their employment agreements when they solicited their
former employer's customers, employees, and contractors.
The United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued an important ruling affecting in - house counsel who act as whistleblowers in litigation against their current or
former employers.
The United States Court of
Appeals, Fourth Circuit, recently considered an
employer's sexual harassment policy and investigation in light of a
former employee's «hostile work environment» allegations.