If being «subject to» calls to mind subjugation and contingency, then
the forms of subjectivity proposed by the collected works refuses any easy recognition.
Drawing from existing (his) stories, personal experiences and observations of day - to - day reality, fragmented narratives and
forms of subjectivity are constructed through an interplay of voices and signs.
Drawing on stories, histories, personal experiences and observations of day - to - day reality, fragmented narratives and
forms of subjectivity are constructed through an interplay of voices and signs.
In interpretation, the reader entertains propositions whose logical subjects include entities in the reader's (and author's) past world; only as such do they become components of the interpreter's «
forms of subjectivity»; so there is always an element of objective reference.
But unlike either of these hermeneutical perspectives, a «process hermeneutic» does not reduce a text's meaning to «
forms of subjectivity,» as Kelsey suggests.
Higher and more complex
forms of subjectivity can emerge, but they can not be described here in detail.
What we know of biological evolution suggests that modern human subjectivity emerged very gradually over a long period of time out of simpler
forms of subjectivity.
A proposition becomes part of a «
form of subjectivity» when the reader admits it as a datum within the process of self - creation by assigning to it a valuative feeling; but that does not mean it is an «injunction.»
The artist explores a variety of monochrome colour blocks, surfaces, geometrical patterns, and dimensions via methodical repetition of gestures: a radical and dynamic approach to the canvas; that refuses
any form of subjectivity.
Not exact matches
People
of faith and even
of non-faith are all living as rented
forms within collective formations ever rising and even falling with the tidal flurries regarding the many societal accolades
of a changing tides bantered momentums riding ever continuing laments to rise and then fall upon socialisms shorelines to be so aligned with
subjectivities of placed regionalized variant findings dispersed yet rationed movements in the ever to so be done fluidic moments by people
of faith and also
of non-faith.
The original
form of Jesus has disappeared from view, transcendence has been swallowed up by immanence, the events
of our salvation history have passed into the dead and lifeless moments
of an irrevocable past, no heaven can appear above the infinite stretches
of a purely exterior spatiality, and no grace can appear within the isolated
subjectivity of a momentary consciousness.
What Whitehead conceives as the
subjectivity of an «actual entity,» its self - determination, has to do, in Aristotle's doctrine, with his principle
of «
form.»
What defines the inquiry as «theology» is its guiding goal, not the distinctive «methods» it employs (although it will be poor theology if it employs inappropriate methods), nor the distinctive
subjectivity of the persons engaged in the inquiry (although it may be pretty thin theology if the inquirers are not personally «
formed» by faith, hope, and love).
The feeling
of subjectivity, with its quality
of self - worth, is not a static
form of enjoyment.
When this occurs, the inherently self - surpassing quality
of the feelings
of subjectivity, which may either overreach themselves in an expansive quality that knows no bounds or else become blocked by retrogressive and discordant tendencies, instead
forms the basis for the religious mode
of experience «at the width where the «self» has been lost, and interest has been transferred to coordinations wider than personality» (AI 368).
The deeper we go, the more finite subjective
forms are knit together by divine conceptual supplementation to become the subjective
form of a wider portion
of God's
subjectivity, till at bottom it becomes coextensive with the whole.
On the other hand, the very exclusiveness
of the occasion's decision, whereby it
forms a determinate bond with every item in its universe (PR 71), prevents any continuation
of its own
subjectivity.
«To come before God» is at once the highest
form of man's «coming to himself», the fulfillment
of his
subjectivity.»
It might then follow that God's experience would include our creaturely experiences in their
subjectivity by virtue
of God's including the regions in which those occasions
form themselves.
Nevertheless it is apparent that in living beings these
forms reveal themselves, on a different level
of integration, as unity and totality, as
subjectivity and self - identity.
Since every occasion
of experience on the Whiteheadian model, no matter how closely determined by its antecedents, has a margin
of «
subjectivity» by which it
forms itself, is something «for itself,» these occasions partially conform to and partially reject or distort the divine aims.
Though conceptual valuation, like concrescence, exemplifies various categoreal obligations, 14 we should not expect
subjectivity in the
form of subjective aim to apply as long as God is conceived as purely nontemporal.
«Concrescence» thus offered a way in which «the complete conceptual realization
of the realm
of ideal
forms» (Religion 154) could be reintroduced, for it need not connote the difficulty
of nontemporal
subjectivity.
While I do not fully endorse her hypothesis that actual entities retain their
subjectivity as «superjects» impacting upon the concrescence
of subsequent actual entities, I am very sympathetic to her presupposition that there is a continuous transfer
of feeling as well as a transmission
of form from one actual entity to another within the cosmic process.
The important difference
of course is that in the experience
of tongues there is no figure
of Jesus giving
form and content to the coming kingdom, so that the
subjectivity of the early charismatic had little to guide it.
Authentic contemporary Existenz is alienated from faith, or alienated from all historic
forms of faith, thus necessitating a non-dialectical retreat
of theology from both the inner and the outer realms, from
subjectivity and objectivity, from the «inner now»
of Geschichte and the «outer now»
of Historie.
One subject draws in a myriad
of data in its instantaneous flicker
of subjectivity, and in that instant, each morsel
of data is assigned its own subjective
form.
Hence
subjectivity and purpose in rudimentary and unconscious
forms are characteristics
of nature generally.
The problems
of how the public, plural
form of objectified
subjectivity is to be thought,
of how reconciliation occurs between the uniform inner perspective and the outer perspective which is only intelligible in relativistic terms, and
of how the connection between the privateness and publicness
of the world is to be comprehended, are all to be regarded as such tasks.
With their situations varying in every case, objectified in differing ways by other occasions, they enter into a multitude
of contexts, and in so doing they pass along to other processes the complexity which they have achieved and
formed in their
subjectivity as a «lure for feeling.»
What I find disappointing about many studies
of public rhetoric is (a) their tendency to focus only on content, rather than the
form or structure
of discourse, (b) their tendency to thematize this content, and (c) their tendency to regard these themes as reflections, or reinforcements,
of collective values — which apparently lie hidden somewhere in the
subjectivity of the collective conscience.
In all
of Trier's films, emotion,
subjectivity, and intuition are in their fullest
forms by female characters: from Grace (Nicole Kidman) in Dogville, She (Charlotte Gainsbourg) in Antichrist, and Justine (Kirsten Dunst) in Melancholia.
It also looks at art — what it is, and what it isn't — and prompts our
subjectivity to draw its own conclusion about the movie, much as it would any
form of art.
Joachim Trier discusses his new film Louder Than Bombs: how he experimented with film
form to show us the
subjectivity of memory, the importance
of two - shots...
Joachim Trier discusses his new film Louder Than Bombs: how he experimented with film
form to show us the
subjectivity of memory, the importance
of two - shots and closeups in the film, and how he used physical spaces to convey emotional meaning.
If we feel like something is holding us back from success (rather than just plain
subjectivity) and free feedback isn't helping us determine what that something might be, it might be worth it to invest in a more aggressive
form of feedback.
A face, he will demonstrate, is a machine for exteriorising — exchanging, universalising —
subjectivity... The face is the
form of the brain in the world.»
Arte Povera chose installations
of ready - mades, and found materials; the artists rejected all evidence
of the artist's touch or signature, deemed as a
form of devalued
subjectivity.
``... Werfel's new abstractions may have abandoned the window on the world for
subjectivity and improvisation, but a feeling
of landscape lingers in her «organic» palette and the
forms evoked by her linear accents.»
The body
of work displays subject matter that attempts to challenge objectivity and
subjectivity as well as challenge perceptions and constructs
of visual
form.
And yet there seems to be a search undertaken by Nistor to combine
form and materiality with the arbitrary
subjectivity of individual viewers, an approach that needs to be clarified conceptually a bit more to be successfully presented.
Reduced color palettes and the repetition
of simple geometric
forms, as well as industrial materials that have a symbiotic relationship to architecture, create new mash - ups that mix formal rigor with sensuality,
subjectivity, personal narrative, and contemporary sexual politics.
This event
forms part
of our exhibition IN / DI / VISIBLE taking Achiampong and Blandy's work as a point
of departure for artists» exploration
of subjectivity and art's potential to represent new ways
of being and becoming.
This means to abandon formalist art histories and artists
subjectivities as primary discourse
of legitimisation, in favour
of an analytical approach to historical conditions
of appearance, and in favour
of a Bakhtinian aesthetic dialogism, which unearths reified, sedimented or implicated
forms as interpellations.
Working under the sign
of Benjamin, «Storyteller» curators Claire Gilman and Margaret Sundell grouped together fourteen artists who employ the story
form as a documentary mode, setting aside Benjamin's distinction between the
subjectivity of oral communication and the assumed veracity
of mechanical broadcast in order to investigate the use
of narrative across a swath
of contemporary art.
With the pitch and timbre
of an accomplished storyteller, Weems uses colloquial
forms — jokes, songs, rebukes — in photographic series that scrutinize
subjectivity and expose pernicious stereotypes.
In and Out
of Place considers
subjectivity as it is
formed through a mutual exchange between bodies and their environments.
Both Ayari and Casey demonstrate a gentler
form of extreme
subjectivity.
Here, the artist struggles with the effable and ineffable experiences
of subjectivity, the perpetual schism between the flatness
of surfaces that enable linguistic communication (whether screen or page) and the more sensuous and palpable dimensions
of desire and the body, which rarely find
form in language.
Performativity, in this way, explores the conscious moment
of staging, appropriating, archiving and re-visiting images and other
forms of representation, touching on questions
of historiography, mediation,
subjectivity, and ownership.