Not exact matches
«The language style used
by climate change
skeptics suggests that the arguments put
forth by these groups may be less credible in that they are relatively less focused upon the propagation of evidence and more intent on refuting the opposing perspective,» said Pennycook.
There's ego there, there's scathing criticism of
climate change
skeptics, and there's a growing sense of themselves being under siege
by vitriolic personal attacks,
by global warming denialism,
by harassment,
by frivolous Freedom of Information Act requests, and so
forth.
Well the problem with that is that many of arguments put
forth by skeptics (e.g. the greenhouse effect is thermodynamically impossible) requires the collusion of many many scientists outside of
climate science.
People have every right to take issue with the inane and offensive things you have said on blogs, your innuendo, your unsubstantiated claims, and your uncritical and unskeptical acceptance of all sundry of accusations put
forth by so - called «
skeptics» against
climate scientists.