Sentences with phrase «forward p»

Greengart expects Huawei to add to its more fashion - forward P lineup with a new device at MWC.

The issue that intrigues me is that, even if M&M have won the Hockey Stick debate (which seems pretty certain now), the issues relating to CO2 role in AGW, and also 20th C warming (come forward P Jones) are yet to be resolved.

The forward P / E is up to 19.0 now and I'm concerned it's getting a little ahead of itself.

Each of the stocks have a forward P / E of less than 15.

NVDA has a forward P / E ratio of 22.46, which isn't insane if they can actually hit the estimates.

Secondly, I specifically addressed this issue of forward P / E's recently in «The Problem With Forward P / E's:»

Let's break that statement down into its two basic arguments: 1) Higher P / E ratios over the last 10 years are distorting CAPE, and: 2) the problem with forward P / E ratios.

What I liked about these companies is that average forward P / E is bellow 20 and most of dividend yield are above 3 %.

Its forward P / E ratio of 26 is a 37 % premium to the S&P 500's 19.

So AEP trades for 17,4 forward P / E and similar for present P / E, which is actually quite good level in today's overpriced market.

The stock is not overly cheap, but still trades at a modest forward P / E of 14, has no long - term debt, and has shown strong earnings growth in recent quarters.

So, forward p / e is only slightly lower than trailing p / e (for most years).

The company's current P / E (price to earnings ratio) is a hefty 32.2, but the forward P / E, based on next 12 - month EPS, is a much more reasonable 25.8.

Which may seem counter-intuitive... in my last post, I argued the S&P's forward P / E isn't anything out of the ordinary, particularly in the context of an unprecedented interest rate / monetary environment.

«The S&P today actually sports an 18.8 forward P / E, a mere 9 % premium to the average 17.2 forward P / E over the last 20 years»

Since stock prices are based on expectations for the future, one could argue that forward P / E ratios are more important.

I should reiterate I was referring to a 12 - mth forward P / E, which helps mitigate the forecast error / bias — and it was a 20 average of the forward P / E, so that same forecasting bias is inherent in the average also (so the relative comparison is pretty valid / valuable).

This suggests that despite U.S. stocks sitting at all - time highs and trailing P / E's in the red zone, stock prices remain reasonable at least based on estimated earnings for the coming year and the resulting S&P 500 forward P / E ratio.

[* And a 24 forward P / E is much cheaper than it might look, as the company's rapid development / growth trajectory leaves a significant % of the estate yet to attain maturity, in terms of an eventual revenue / profit run - rate].

OmniVision Technologies (NYSE: OVTI) has one of the cheapest valuations based on forward P / E among semiconductor stocks.

The stock doesn't look particularly cheap with a forward P / E ratio of 18.0, but the dividend should remain solid.

KO doesn't look particularly cheap today, but I would be much more interested in accumulating shares closer to $ 40, which would drop the company's forward P / E multiple closer to 20x.

Shares appear to be undervalued currently as the FY 2015 forward P / E ratio estimate sits at 21.5.

The company is trading at a forward P / E of 9.25 and PEG ratio of.50.

The positive forward P / E requirement is intended to eliminate companies which do not expect profits over the next year but will not eliminate companies with dwindling earnings growth.

Its forward P / E ratio of 23 is a steep discount to Amazon's 151, Netflix's 148, Facebook's 31 and Google's 28.

It's trading at a forward P / E of 6, a trailing P / E of 5.5, and 65 % of unadjusted book.

Well, again I fail to understand the alarm: The S&P today actually sports an 18.8 forward P / E, a mere 9 % premium to the average 17.2 forward P / E over the last 20 years (which included the dot - com bubble, but also the financial crisis).

The stock trades at a P / E of 26 and a forward P / E of 24.

As for the stock, it's been quiet for the past few years, and currently trades at a P / E of 20 and a forward P / E of 18.

That's because BEN's forward P / E is now 15.0, far below the S&P 500's multiple of 17.4.

But which metric has a better predictive power as far as stock returns are concerned, trailing or forward P / E ratios?

Nevertheless, there is no much evidence as to which stocks do better, those that have low forward P / E or low trailing P / E.

And this isn't a new development: Apple's forward P / E actually is toward the higher end of its multi-year range.

Other investors, however, like to use forward P / E ratios to identify outperforming stocks going forward.

I find that low forward P / E quartile stocks experience the same return as high forward P / E quartile stocks for AMEX stocks, and beat the high P / E quartile stocks by 2.40 % for NASDAQ and 11.64 % for NYSE stocks.

The S&P 500's forward P / E ratio of 17.1 sits approximately 20 % above its 10 - year average.

Why do forward P / E ratios have inferior forecasting ability compared to trailing P / E ratios?

This biases forward P / E ratios down giving the impression that a stock commands a low P / E, when in fact it may not be as earnings are eventually revised downwards and what appeared at first to be a value stock may, in fact, turn out to be a high P / E stock.

My research shows that while forward P / E ratios are a good predictor of future returns for NYSE stocks, they are not as good predictor of future returns for AMEX and NASDAQ stocks.

This may explain why forward P / E ratios work well in predicting future returns for NYSE stocks, but they do not work as well (compared to trailing P / E ratios) for AMEX and NASDAQ stocks, namely, the riskier group of stocks.

This chart demonstrates the stock market's valuation (forward P / E ratio).

They replaced their quotes with forward P / E's and claimed «the markets have lots of upside because the index PE is only 12 and historically PE = 15 was the average.»

P / Bk is less subjective than the alternative «forward P / E» or «P / E based on normalized earnings», when the company hits turbulence.

The forward P / E uses estimates of future earnings (see chart of estimate errors).

The relationship between the forward P / E ratio and interest rates is curvilinear.

For example, he cites «the one quarter ahead forward P / E of the S&P 500 is at 12...» How does he get that?

Consensus earnings forecasts from Wall Street analysts for 2009 work out to a forward P / E of around 12 for the S. & P. 500.»

Its forward P / E ratio is only 12.80 which is in the lower half of its historical range and in line or cheaper than its major competitors.

Its forward P / E ratio of 14 is a 30 % discount to the S&P 500's 20.