Sentences with phrase «forward by climate scientists»

That's within the 1 to 2 percent annual range for CO2 growth expected in «high - growth» scenarios put forward by climate scientists.

Not exact matches

Dennis Avery of the Hudson Institute cited Doran's study, and claimed that «The American people are being hoodwinked not just by the green activists, but by the scientists who get billions of dollars for creating global climate models that can't even forecast backward, let alone forward.»

Now the question is, can the real climate scientists come forward and present the truth about global warming, or are we in for more ridiculous predictions about an ice free arctic by 2013 and the extinction of polar bears?

Dennis Avery of the Hudson Institute cited Doran's study, and claimed that «The American people are being hoodwinked not just by the green activists, but by the scientists who get billions of dollars for creating global climate models that can't even forecast backward, let alone forward.»

The centerpiece of the article was Dr. Holdren's description of the evolving arguments put forward by public figures, including some scientists, challenging climate science as they fight restrictions on greenhouse gases:

Goodwin briefly departed from academic jargon with one suggestion for trying to move the debate forward by suggesting that climate scientists voluntarily assume «extra responsibility» as follows:

As the Trump administration charges forward with its war on science by canceling a «crucial» carbon monitoring system at NASA, scientists and climate experts are sounding alarms over atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) that just surpassed a «troubling» threshold for the first time in human history.

The scientists also put paid to claims that global warming has «stopped» because global temperatures in the past 15 years have not continued the strong upward march of the preceding years, which is a key argument put forward by sceptics to cast doubt on climate science.

Research on the intersections of gender equality and climate change was brought forward by CIFOR scientists in a couple of sessions arranged together with the Global Gender and Climate Alliance, including UN Women, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and the Women's Environment and Development Organization climate change was brought forward by CIFOR scientists in a couple of sessions arranged together with the Global Gender and Climate Alliance, including UN Women, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and the Women's Environment and Development Organization Climate Alliance, including UN Women, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and the Women's Environment and Development Organization (WEDO).

The essential idea is not to replicate the 2000 National Assessment in its particulars, but rather to move forward with a strong, updated, coordinated, integrative effort, employing the method of having climate scientists and other experts communicate directly with policymakers and other stakeholders, geographical region - by - region, and socioeconomic sector - by - sector, to diagnose vulnerabilities and develop response strategies, without political interference with free and open communication.

Below is the very simple and straight forward survey statement sent out to 1518 climate scientists / experts by GeoengineeringWatch and the LASG team.

Roger Pielke Sr. confronts specific issues regarding specific scientists regularly at his blog, so does Roger Pielke Jr. (BTW I received «The Climate Fix» in the mail yesterday and look forward to when I can order a book by Dr. Judith Curry that I have a chance of understanding — your current publications are beyond a layman's grasp & quite pricey).

@TerjeP (say Tay - a) Most of the scientists working in climate related science are not on a «side», they are not all in total agreement with each other and they are not all putting forward a narrow unifying theory, despite the way they are being grouped into a straw man by mischief makers.

While many scientists and climate change activists hailed December's Paris agreement as a historic step forward for international efforts to limit global warming, the landmark accord rests on a highly dubious assumption: to achieve the goal of limiting the rise in global average temperature to less than 2 °C (much less the more ambitious goal of 1.5 °C), we don't just need to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide to essentially zero by the end of this century.