Plus, it is the most affordable vehicle in its class with superior - rated
forward crash prevention.
On its website Tesla talks the talk, and says that its current vehicles will be able to be retroactively have
forward crash prevention, but that it «will take several months for all the features to be completed and uploaded to the cars.»
IIHS also recently completed a study designed to see if
forward crash prevention systems with automatic emergency braking was proving to be effective in the real world.
So, for example, the Subaru Outback can be advertised as earning the Top Safety Pick Plus rating, even though much of the inventory on its dealers» lots are not actually TSP + eligible because
the forward crash prevention system is not included on top - selling trims.
Even worse, automakers like Subaru with excellent
forward crash prevention systems don't include it on all trims.
Family - minded buyers will love the Outlander's exemplary crash test ratings, and the availability of
forward crash prevention on an Outlander priced out below $ 30,000 allows for a wider array of buyers to obtain this useful technology.
According to the Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Lexus CT 200h earns good ratings in all crash tests including the small front overlap and it's a Top Safety Pick + with a superior rating for
forward crash prevention.
The Mazda6 and Subaru legacy both earn a superior rating for
forward crash prevention, while the VW Golf is rated as advanced with optional equipment, however, the headlights are rated poor.
Of these four SUVs when equipped with their respective
forward crash prevention systems, the Subaru is least expensive at $ 27,240, with the Mazda costing $ 28,225, the Mitsubishi costing $ 30,720, and the Nissan Rogue costing $ 30,920, all including destination.
But earning the Top Safety Pick + designation is the bigger achievement, as recipients need to offer
forward crash prevention and good lighting in addition to acing the IIHS» crash tests.
Not exact matches
Performance requirements: Participating manufacturers will ensure vehicles have both a
forward collision warning system that meets a subset of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's current 5 - Star Safety Ratings program requirements on the timing of driver alerts and an automatic braking system that earns at least an advanced rating in the current Insurance Institute for Highway Safety front
crash prevention track tests.
The X1 gets Good ratings in all
crash tests and an Advanced score for
forward collision
prevention, but a Marginal for headlight performance.
Besides rear cameras and rear parking sensors, the studied features include front
crash prevention with
forward collision warning, front
crash prevention with automatic emergency braking, adaptive front lighting, lane departure warning and blind spot monitoring.
Both pickups are available with front
crash prevention with an optional
forward collision warning system.
Both the crew cab and extended cab F - 150 pickups are rated basic for front
crash prevention when equipped with Ford's optional
forward collision warning system, which meets performance criteria set by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
«Just as
forward collision warning systems that include autonomous braking cut
crashes more sharply than those that don't, lane departure
prevention systems that don't rely on a driver's response may hold more promise than the systems HLDI has looked at so far,» says David Zuby, the Institute's chief research officer.
Its optional
forward collision warning system earns it a basic rating for front
crash prevention.
The 2017 Ford Escape also offers a wide variety of
crash prevention and safety technology, including adaptive cruise control and
forward collision alert that primes the brakes if an emergency stop is needed.
The 2017 Odyssey was available only with optional
forward collision warning, earning it a basic rating for front
crash prevention.
The Sorento is a Top Safety Pick Plus with Good scores for all
crash tests, a Superior score for
forward collision
prevention and an Acceptable rating for headlight performance.
However, the small front overlap
crash test and headlight performance are rated Poor and there is no score for
forward collision
prevention.
The Sonic is available with an optional
forward collision warning system that earns a basic rating from IIHS for front
crash prevention.
The Institute's research on the effects of front
crash prevention on police - reported
crashes found that vehicles with
forward collision warning and automatic braking had a 20 percent higher rate of being rear - ended than vehicles without the systems.
The QX60 also received credit for
forward collision warning components in its front
crash prevention system that meets National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) criteria.
However, the Q3 does not offer front
crash prevention features like automatic emergency braking or
forward collision warning.
Unlike the Q3, the 2016 Audi Q5 features optional
crash prevention technology like
forward collision warning and low - speed autobrake, which helped it earn the highest rating possible of Top Safety Pick Plus.
In addition, headlight performance and frontal
crash prevention by means of auto - braking and
forward collision warning systems are evaluated.
The 2016 Volkswagen Golf received a Top Safety Pick Plus rating from the IIHS because of its good test performance, on top of its
crash prevention technologies such as
forward collision warning and low - speed autobrake.
The GTI recieved an advanced rating in front
crash prevention thanks to its low - speed autobrake and
forward collision warning technology.
Since 2012 it has become harder for car companies to earn the organization's «Top Safety Pick» rating thanks to the addition of a tough new small overlap frontal - impact
crash test, and new ratings of
forward collision warning and collision
prevention systems.
Cutting edge
crash prevention technologies fitted to the mid-size General Motors pickups include
forward collision and lane departure warning systems, which are offered as optional equipment.
Both vehicles also receive credit for
forward collision warning components in their front
crash prevention systems that meet National Highway Traffic Safety Administration criteria.
An optional
forward collision warning system earns the car a basic rating for front
crash prevention.
A mandate for speed limiters also is under consideration, along with a requirement that trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more have a
forward collision warning system with automatic braking (see «Front
crash prevention may be required for large trucks,» Feb. 26, 2016).
The Legacy and Outback earn superior ratings for front
crash prevention when equipped with EyeSight, their optional
forward collision warning system with autobrake.
Ford and Dodge offer optional
forward collision warning systems on the Mustang and Challenger, and both coupes earn a basic rating for front
crash prevention because their systems meet performance criteria set by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The standard Uconnect Access system includes automatic
crash notification, on - demand roadside assistance, remote door unlocking and stolen vehicle assistance, while the optional SafetyTec Plus package (offered on all but the 300 Limited) adds
forward collision warning and mitigation with automatic braking, lane - departure warning and
prevention and a blind spot monitor with rear cross-traffic alert.
They also may help explain why studies so far haven't found a consistent benefit from the feature, in contrast to
forward collision warning (see «Evidence continues to mount in favor of front
crash prevention,» Aug. 26, 2015, and Status Report special issue:
crash avoidance, July 3, 2012).
The IIHS gave the latest Murano it is coveted highest - possible ranking of «Good» in five
crash tests and the highest rating of «Superior» for frontal
crash prevention after its standard
forward collision warning and emergency automatic braking systems avoided a 12 mph frontal collision.