We stand with the millions of people around the world paying for the ignorance and arrogance of countries and
fossil fuel corporations who put the interests of profits ahead of the needs of people.
94 Secular said, «So, for
the fossil fuel corporations who funded the AGW denial propaganda campaign, the question would be «What did they know, and when did they know it?
Not exact matches
Shifting the cost of global warming to those
who are disproportionately the perpetrators, Grossman argues, could make
fossil fuels more expensive and thus force
corporations to pay more attention to renewable energy.
It's really too bad that you haven't seen fit to give even a fraction of the attention to the very real, very serious question of
who broke into the computer system and stole the emails that you have given to legitimizing the baseless, slanderous and inflammatory charges that various
fossil fuel corporation stooges made about the emails.
It is not surprising that the eco-pragmatists attract support from conservatives
who have doggedly resisted all measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, defended the interests of
fossil fuel corporations, and in some cases worked hard to trash climate science.
Anyone
who reads the detailed scientific explanation of Mr. Gary Novak (/ / nov55.com/ntyg.html), can easily grasp that human use and abuse of
fossil fuels do not have a significant impact on Earth climate; and that implementing the Kyoto Protocol would only harm the health of the economy — not only the profits of big
corporations, but also the pockets of all consumers — even the poorest.
The EU has so far continued to align itself with historic polluters like the USA and Australia, blocking progress towards a conflict of interest policy which could protect the UN climate talks from the harmful influence of
fossil fuel corporations and their lobbyists,
who have been delaying and weakening progress on effective climate action.
Trump is handing our country over to
fossil fuel corporations,
who will desecrate our public lands and defile our oceans for dirty oil and coal.
I do see wrt to US laws, you are proposing confiscation and nationalization of resources, since many of the
fossil fuels are owned by individuals
who have leased their mineral rights to
corporations.
The letter specifically aims the RICO act at «
corporations in the
fossil fuel industry and their supporters»...
who do you think the «supporters» are?
Except of course for the
fossil fuel corporations,
who will see their hundreds of billions of dollars in profits shift to other sectors of the economy.
But if anyone could afford to make a bigger and earlier switch to Non-carbon energy use it would be the richest 1 billion people (and the
corporations / government they might work for)-- these «wealthier» people also have «the pull» to tell those
who they buy stuff from that
fossil fuels is not an option in their supply line anymore.
We are up against the world's largest
corporations,
who are attempting to extract, transport and burn
fossil fuels at an unprecedented rate, all as the climate crisis spins out of control.
Yes, it would certainly be better for
corporations like ExxonMobil, which alone makes about ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY IN PROFIT from
fossil fuels, if climate scientists
who understand that a rapid phaseout of
fossil fuel consumption is urgently needed if we are to have any hope of averting the most catastrophic outcomes of AGW, would just stick to the science and keep their mouths shut about that so as not to «spur political action» to save civilization from destruction.