Accusations of corrupt
fossil fuel industry influence over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
Not exact matches
It really points to very serious widespread problems in the U.S. academic and journalistic professions — you can't do research on renewable energy in the U.S. academic system, because of
fossil fuel influence, and you can't get honest coverage of renewable energy initiatives in the U.S. press, also because of undue
influence by vested interests — and more often than not these days, those vested interests are in finance, not in
industry.
It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence» in the fight over climate science and policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage in money and
influence held by
industries dealing in, or dependent on,
fossil fuels.
Familiar answers include the recent recession, the political
influence of the
fossil fuel industries, and economic development imperatives in countries undergoing industrialization.
Both groups has received funding from ExxonMobil, so even indirectly, you have received some «
influence» or funding from the
fossil fuel industry.
We learned the Caps and Targets Review is pivotal, must consider matters beyond its scope, and must make ambitious recommendations to send a strong investment signal and counter the sabotaging
influence of the
fossil fuel industry.
The PR
industry is a major component of the
influence peddling
industry that stretches across Washington and the world, and they are making large sums of money from energy companies and other important players that have businesses connected casino online to
fossil fuels and energy policy,
The point here is not that Gelbspan appears to have put out misinformation about his collective work back in 2004, it is that his words have huge
influence right up to the present time, such as the only months - old «
fossil fuel industry misinformation» research paper written by an impressionable young college student, or the days - old suggestion by one of his Facebook Friends that he should get a guest appearance on CNBC's Rachel Maddow show.
All of our work leverages people power to dismantle the
influence and infrastructure of the
fossil fuel industry.
The latest resolution calls on Trump and Congress to hand over the power to regulate and permit
fossil fuel development on public lands to the states, where the
industry has its greatest power and
influence over government.
Because I accept the science and from what I can tell attempts to discredit the science are funded by
fossil fuel industries funnelling money to think tanks, opinion bloggers and facebook pages in an effort to
influence the political process.
«attempts to discredit the science are funded by
fossil fuel industries funnelling money to think tanks, opinion bloggers and facebook pages in an effort to
influence the political process»
For decades, the
fossil fuel industry has used its
influence to spread false or misleading information about climate change — a strong motivation for choosing low - carbon energy sources like wind or solar (in addition to the economic reasons).
It's not as if the
fossil -
fuel industry doesn't have a lot of
influence there.
But conservatives in Congress — notably Senators Hagel and Larry E. Craig, Republican of Idaho — and groups representing
industries whose business depends on
fossil fuels have long criticized the findings of the international panel as biased, pointing particularly to differences between the voluminous chapters on complicated scientific points and briskly worded summaries that tend to
influence policy.
Partly because of the
influence of the oil
industry, the rich world's governments have refused to agree to a reduction in the use of
fossil fuels sufficient to arrest it.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As the sixth round of U.S. - European Union trade negotiations in Brussels moves toward conclusion, Friends of the Earth U.S. is dismayed by the
fossil fuel industry's
influence on the talks, as documented in a new report.
The premise of the divestment campaign is simple: non-profit organisations must move their investments away from
fossil fuels, reducing the power and
influence this
industry has on society.
Hopefully the political situation will have greatly improved by the time you read this, but at present in Australia there are only two political parties that have a chance of forming government and both are heavily
influenced by the
fossil fuel industries.
Oil Change works to achieve its mission by producing strategic research and hard - hitting investigations; engaging in domestic and international policy and media spaces; and providing leadership in organizing resistance to the political
influence of the
fossil fuel industry.
And Harvard still feels pulling its investments out of
fossil fuels would «diminish the
influence or voice we might have with this
industry.»
These testimonies were vital because they gave faces to the impacts of the
fossil fuel industry, while also highlighting the international stretch of it's
influence.
We can no longer allow the
fossil fuel industry to
influence what is taught in our classrooms, particularly when climate change denial threatens the integrity of science education on a larger scale.»
The move, announced today, confirms fears that the
fossil fuel industry continues to heavily
influence decisions in the White House.
With the
fossil fuel industry and their allies wielding powerful
influence over our Congress, we need to accelerate the change and solutions here in the Northwest.
Using this knowledge and experience, we produce cutting edge research and analysis and craft strategic, incisive campaigns, supporting a diversity of strategies and tactics to challenge the
influence of the
fossil fuel industry.
Every institution that divests is adding to the pressure
fossil fuel industry is feeling, and eroding the social acceptance and political
influence of these companies.
It's a model (so it ai nt the truth) but it a nice one to illustrate the point you make about emerging systems of
influence that are rapidly taking over the
fossil fuel industry.
Lord Deben was clearly and adamantly of the view that any criticism of the CCC's report in question has origins in a
fossil fuel industry - funded conspiracy, which had even
influenced the editorial decisions of the Today Programme.
«The judicial branch is much less
influenced by special interests such as the
fossil fuel industry,» Hansen told The Atlantic in 2012.
It concludes that establishing the links between former government officials and the
fossil fuel industry highlights «the major potential for conflict of interest», adding: «When one takes into account what is at stake for large
fossil fuel companies, and how much lobbying they conduct on climate policy more generally, weak revolving door policy provides another avenue of
influence for private
fossil fuel interests to exploit».
Fossil fuel companies like ExxonMobil and Koch
Industries are among the largest and most profitable in the nation, and they exert their
influence over the political process to deprive the 99 % of something we all want: Clean, secure energy.
When should we have done something: Without the
influence of coal
industry propaganda and lobbying: There would have been zero large
fossil fueled electric power plants after 1970.
What the big banks and the
fossil fuel industry have tried to
influence is cap and trade with offsets, because that would allows business as usual to basically continue with only small perturbations.