There is, in fact, a whole pyramid
of fossil fuel inputs to the production of all alternative energy capital equipment.
I'm only saying this to note I know the anthropogenic aerosols from this period can't be directly compared to the emission rate
per fossil fuel input as later in the 20th century.
I'd like to have seen a table giving the various energy and
fossil fuel inputs for the calculation, if only to see what the biggest inputs are.
But for the U.S. primary energy
fossil fuel input into the electric power sector in 2010, it seems to be about 0.39933 W / (kg CO2 / yr)(1.4632 W / (kg C / yr)-RRB-.
Leave carbon content of biofuels and biomass untaxed, at least for now, while
taxing fossil fuel inputs to biofuel production.
Switchgrass production
requires fossil fuel inputs for machinery used in establishment (soil preparation and seed sowing), cultivation, harvest, and transportation to the processing plant (Qin et al. 2006).
Ways to
reduce fossil fuel inputs to food systems include the use of farm machinery powered by renewable electricity or farm - produced biofuels; the localization of food systems to reduce transport (perhaps entailing vertical urban agriculture); the adoption of organic and ecological production practices to reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides; and an overall reduction in the consumption of highly processed foods.
Many local farmers are smaller - scale (less energy intensive) and use methods that reduce their dependence on
excessive fossil fuel inputs and inappropriate tilling methods (farmers love to talk about their farms — ask about their methods if you're concerned).
«PV BEV systems also have the lowest life - cycle GHG emissions throughout the U.S. and the
lowest fossil fuel inputs, except in locations that have very high hypothetical switchgrass yields of 16 or more tons per hectare.»
Cornell biology professor David Pimentel and U-C Berkeley engineering professor Tad W. Patzek concluded in a detailed analysis that production of leading biofuels uses
more fossil fuel inputs than they displace, i.e., that their lifecycle emissions exceed those of fossil fuels.
At the same time, fossil fuels have shrunk the human footprint on the natural world by amplifying the food supply per acre of arable land through natural gas — based fertilizers and
other fossil fuel inputs.»
After all, as DaveMart says in pushing his pet nuclear, in principle everything could be electrified so that the
only fossil fuel inputs are for the hydrogen - but if that's (say) 80 % of the total, and all the trucks and water boiling is the other 20 %, that's a very different outlook than the reverse, for a fossil - fuel - constrained, or CO2 emissions - constrained future.
In addition to concerns about feedstock limitations, corn ethanol derives much of its energy
from fossil fuel inputs.»
Our agriculture depends on high - yield crop variants supported by large inputs of energy, water and fertiliser, the latter in particular requiring high levels
of fossil fuel input.
Note, however, that the
substantial fossil fuel inputs to biofuels would be taxed under this option, causing prices of fossil fuel - intensive biofuels to rise in proportion to a carbon tax.
No chemical /
fossil fuel inputs to grow the food for soy or feed the cows for dairy, no packaging, no transport to / from the store, no bottles to manufacture or wash (when not pumping), really no waste at all!
This time, the dominant carbon isotopic values in the new inputs were about -60 ‰, pointing to a microbially driven source rather than
fossil fuel inputs.
The fossil fuel inputs into ethanol production are also largely non-liquid (natural gas and coal).
A minimal first step would be to ensure that
all fossil fuel inputs to biofuels are carbon - taxed, including natural gas used as feedstock for ammonia - based fertilizers of corn grown for ethanol.
We start with a minimal approach that would tax
all fossil fuel inputs of bioenergy including those used to manufacture fertilizer for corn grown for ethanol.
Companion planting rye or switchgrass or some other crop that fixes nitrogen may not demand
the fossil fuel inputs assumed.
In the context of Peak Oil, it is not
the fossil fuel inputs that matter, but rather the petroleum inputs
But if the argument is how much ethanol is really helping - and of course that's exactly what the argument is - then that number is (roughly) 3 % when you correct for the energy content, 2 % when you correct for the liquid
fossil fuel inputs, and under 1 % when you correct for total fossil fuel inputs.