Not exact matches
The rise of renewables helps, but in order to eliminate
fossil -
fuel pollution nuclear power is
also required, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
The position paper on air
pollution and cardiovascular disease was written by experts from the European Society of Cardiology and
also recommends decreasing the use of
fossil fuels.
They showed that reducing greenhouse gas emissions from burning
fossil fuels also reduces the
pollution that causes millions of premature deaths in societies around the world.
The degree of air
pollution in China exceeded that in most of the world, yet assessments of total health effects must
also include other
fossil fuel caused air and water pollutants, as discussed in the following section on ecology and the environment.
The
fossil fuel alternative
also comes with many, many well proven consequent illnesses and deaths: from the
pollution connected with coal mining and with the
pollution following the burning of the coal.
Reliance on such
fossil -
fuel inputs not only sustains oil dependency but
also represents a major water
pollution problem when they run off into rivers.
Interestingly, the landmark international accord draws a big fat highlight (and maybe a circle and some stars in the margin) across the work that activists and leaders are doing in the Pacific Northwest: not just the work to keep
fossil fuels in the ground and make polluters pay for their
pollution, but
also our work to reduce the influence of money in politics and reform broken North American democratic institutions.
China will start reducing their
pollution and
also we will finally see the problem with the $ 500 billion / year
fossil fuels subsidies being solved.
The IEA
also notes drastic improvements in air
pollution, cuts in
fossil fuel import bills and lower household energy expenditures would complement the decarbonisation achieved, if well designed policies are used.
It has
also increased over time, as measures to improve energy efficiency and reduce waste plus
pollution have been implemented, and there is no doubt that this improvement will continue, partly as a result of increasing
fossil fuel prices and other market - driven considerations.
These systems
also minimize the threats of acid rain, air
pollution, the greenhouse effect and global warming — problems directly linked to the burning of
fossil fuels.
We, all of us, believe that a transition to a clean energy future isn't just about ending
pollution, it's
also an opportunity to ensure that the new energy economy shares its wealth more equitably than the
fossil fueled economic oligarchy we're trying to leave behind.
However, as it became clear that biofuels were not only connected to deforestation,
pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions (sometimes exceeding
fossil fuels), but
also competed with the global food supply and water sources, biofuels no longer seemed like a silver bullet, but a new problem facing the environment and the poor.
I find it telling that someone who accuses those who use the word «
pollution» to describe excess atmospheric CO2 of being «Orwellian» can
also describe proposals for what is a form of «user - pays» in
fossil fuel usage as «like listening to Marxist students of the 1960s.»
As stated before I would like to see subsidies for
fossil fuel removed and
also external costs such as healthcare due to air
pollution factored in as that would give a true cost of power generation.
These can range from reducing greenhouse gas emissions but
also battling the scourge of air
pollution, improving energy security by reducing the dependency of
fossil fuels, diversifying supply, creating high - tech jobs or fostering innovation.
It would
also enable more of the
fossil fuel pollution driving climate change, which is already raising sea levels and causing rampant flooding in Virginia's coastal communities.
Air
pollution caused by the use of
fossil fuels is
also separately contributing to the deaths of at least 4.5 m people a year, the report found.
Conservative think - tanks are organisations that oppose policies, such as regulation of
pollution by the
fossil fuel industry (some have
also opposed regulation of the tobacco industry in the past and, in fact, some continue to do so today).
They
also lessen reliance on
fossil fuels, thus decreasing carbon dioxide emissions and other forms of
pollution harmful to humans and the planet alike.
The
fossil fuel companies use «political payola» (bribes) to influence a majority in Congress to create and sustain
pollution practices... while
also sustaining inefficient, «dirty energy» policies that help optimize the profits of these corrupt, wealthy corporations.
In doing so we'll
also prevent some 1.5 million premature deaths annually due to improved air quality.Soot Comes Out of the Atmosphere in Weeks, Not Decades Since soot — which in this context comes from older diesel engines and burning other
fossil fuels, industrial sources, inefficient biomass cookstoves used in many developing nations — comes out of the atmosphere in a matter of weeks, not decades or centuries like carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases, removing the source of
pollution is highly effective in both stopping the warming effects as well as improving air quality.
«It is... going to generate
pollution, not just from
fossil fuels but
also from lithium plants, which produce sulphur dioxide,» Luis Alberto Echazu, Bolivian minister for mining, told BBC News.
Because coal — by far the most carbonintensive
fossil fuel — will most likely be replaced by cleaner energy sources; in that case, the moment China's coal consumption plateaus will
also be the moment their greenhouse - gas
pollution plateaus.
Some Mitigationists (of all degrees of urgency) are
also «no regrets» proponents of shifting away from
fossil fuels for other reasons — peak - oil types, environmentalists worried about conventional air
pollution, anti - automobile / anti-suburb activists, and so on.
Ending
fossil fuel subsidies would
also save treasuries money and discourage
pollution.