Trump's Ex-Im Bank appointment could accelerate climate change WASHINGTON, D.C. - A multi-part Columbia School of Journalism investigation published this week reveals that the U.S. Export - Import Bank has financed tens of billions of dollars in
fossil fuel projects under the Obama administration, triple the levels seen under the Bush administration.
When reviewing the environmental impacts of
fossil fuel projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the judges said, the agency can't assume the harmful effects away by claiming that dirty fuels left untouched in one location would automatically bubble up, greenhouse gas emissions and all, somewhere else.
Not exact matches
Anna Roggenbuck, Policy Officer at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: «With the decision to finance TANAP, the EIB has shown its disregard to Europe's commitments to climate change mitigation.This
project has been approved without a proper climate impact assessment, and in contradiction to pledges
under the Paris Agreement to keep global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius which entails limiting
fossil fuels consumption.»
A quick glance at the graph you cite shows the
projected CO2 levels
under a scenario with us limiting
Fossil Fuel Emissions — this is the projection IF we take action to limit fossil fue
Fossil Fuel Emissions — this is the projection IF we take action to limit fossil fuel
Fuel Emissions — this is the projection IF we take action to limit
fossil fue
fossil fuel fuel use.
«China, the world's biggest investor in
fossil -
fuel generation, began construction on over 70 gigawatts of new coal
projects last year (2015) while it still had 200 gigawatts
under construction.»
If the Senate approves these nominees, Ex-Im could vote on 13 additional
fossil fuel projects now
under consideration.
Under NMBI legislation, there would be no new
fossil fuel project applications.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of
fossil fuels at
projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature
under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
Under NMBI legislation, there would be no new
fossil fuel project or native forest logging applications.
(1) No False Choices: To Preserve a Livable Climate, We Need to Slash Both CO2 and Methane ASAP; (2) Oil Change International Report:
Fossil Fuel Production Subsidies Exceed $ 21 Billion Annually in United States, have increased by 45 %
under Obama's «All of the Above» energy policy; (3) Joint Economic Committee Hearing on «The Economic Impact of Increased Natural Gas Production» (video); (4) Leaked Trade Deal Document Shows EU Pressuring U.S. to Lift Crude Oil Export Ban; (5) Deep Decarbonization Pathways
Project (DDPP) Presents Interim Report to UN Secretary - General Ban Ki - Moon.
The Al Rajef Wind Power
Project is one of the first wind ventures to be developed
under Jordan's feed - in - tariff scheme, as the country seeks to shift away from its dependence on imported
fossil fuels.