View the table on the skull comparison page, which demonstrates that creationists actually find it not «easy», but horribly difficult to classify
fossils as ape or human.
Not exact matches
If you committed one of the atheistic mortal sins, like believing a proposition without proof, Galapagor, the man -
ape overseer of the Atheist Underworld, may leave your essence
as a trilobite deep in the
fossil layer.
works both ways bro I can't count the number of times I've had scripture quoted at me
as if it would convert me or the number of times people have said inane things like «why are there still
apes if we evolved from them» or any BS about missing links or transitional
fossils.
To establish the
fossil's identity, the researchers compared a 3 - D image of the ancient finger bone with corresponding bones of present - day people,
apes and monkeys,
as well
as Neandertals and other ancient hominids.
In addition to being the oldest known example of an early primate skeleton, the new
fossil is crucial in elucidating a pivotal event in primate and human evolution — the evolutionary divergence that led to modern monkeys,
apes and humans (collectively known
as anthropoids) on one branch, and to living tarsiers on the other.
But
fossils that old and older look either
ape or protohuman, so some paleontologists argue for a split
as far back
as 7 million years ago.
This 11.6 - million - year - old
fossil find, nicknamed Laia by its discoverers, represents the first evidence that present - day African
apes descended from a relatively small, somewhat gibbonlike common ancestor — not large - bodied African primates
as previously thought, scientists report in the Oct. 30 Science.
Together with his colleagues from the Senckenberg Research Institute, Prof. Dr. Friedmann Schrenk and PD Dr. Ottmar Kullmer,
as well
as other international scientists, the biogeologist from Tübingen examined the
fossil giant
ape's tooth enamel in order to make inferences on its diet and to define potential factors for its extinction.
Using props and examples from the
fossil record, the scientists showed how the very adaptations that have made humans so successful — such
as upright walking and our big, complex brains — have been the result of constant remodeling of an ancient
ape body plan that was originally used for life in the trees.
Recent humans and their
fossil relatives are classified
as having thick molar enamel, one of very few dental traits that distinguish hominins from living African
apes.
Moreover,
as humans and
apes differ in loading of the foot, this region is relevant to questions concerning arboreal locomotion and bipedality in the hominoid
fossil record.
The
fossils form such a neatly graded series, getting less and less
ape - like and more and more human
as they get closer in time to the present, that the most earnest creationist can do little more than muddy the waters by inflating and distorting the existence of points of disagreement between specialists, or trying to revive long since discredited Homo sapiens specimens once claimed to have been from extremely ancient deposits.
Curiously,
as a debating tactic to discredit other hominid
fossils, creationists often accept 1470
as human, even though many of them reject larger - brained erectus specimens
as apes.
However Tobias (1987) shows that other habilis
fossils such
as OH 7, OH 13, OH 16 and OH 24 (which creationists consider
apes) all share many advanced features with ER 1470.
After the Piltdown fraud was exposed, the australopithecines came into favour
as a transitional form linking an
ape - like common - ancestor to human beings, and this link was further strengthened by later finds of both erectus and australopithecine
fossils, mainly in East and South.
In 1894 Dubois published a description of his
fossils, naming them Pithecanthropus erectus, describing it
as neither
ape nor human, but something intermediate.
Bao Bao share the same sprite
as Cave
Ape and the
Fossil Ape.