Sentences with phrase «found by the family court»

Based on the valuations and earning capacities found by the family court and affirmed by the Court of Appeals, the family court ordered Husband to pay substantial alimony, retroactive support and attorney's fees.

allows the local commissioner of social services or local commissioner of health to give consent for medical, dental, health and hospital services for any child found by the family court to be an abused, neglected or destitute child.

Not exact matches

«In 2014 the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice issued Mr Page with a reprimand after finding that during a Family Court hearing he had allowed himself to be influenced by his religious beliefs and not by the evidence.»

If you think it was bad last night wait for the Tottenham game, I was speaking to a mate of mine and he said a lot of the old faces are already planning to come and cause trouble inside and outside, the trouble is all the old faces and some new ones know this Stadium is perfect for hooliganism, even if they get banned it might be one or two last hurrahs, I expect every game we are allowed to play this season will have similar stories and our name will be dragged through the mud, everyone that is involved in it if found guilty by a court should be named and shamed publically so that there families and employers can judge them also.

A 2012 paper found that children served by baby courts ended up in a permanent home within an average of 1 year, twice as fast as children served by traditional family court.

The funds, obtained from a parolee who was found by NYS Parole officers to be in possession of $ 16,800 from a personal injury settlement, were secured after the Counsels» Office filed two petitions in Erie County Family Court requesting that the money be turned over to pay arrears accrued in the two cases.

increase CPS powers to help children by creating a presumption of neglect if there is an incident of excessive corporal punishment, which will make it easier for child protection agencies to make a finding of abuse that will allow Family Court to take appropriate action to protect a child, up to removing a child when a guardian poses a risk to the child;

The family of Private Cheryl James, 18, who was found with gunshot wounds, has been granted permission by the attorney general, Dominic Grieve, to seek a fresh inquest at the high court.

He was later found guilty by the family court.

Our key finding is that increased per - pupil spending, induced by court - ordered SFRs, increased high school graduation rates, educational attainment, earnings, and family incomes for children who attended school after these reforms were implemented in affected districts.

Universities Run Into Problems When They Hire Presidents From The Business World Think Progress, 3/7/16 «Richard P. Chait, a research professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, adds that this mentality may be driven by the fact that more families tend to look at themselves as customers — especially the families of students with the most impressive applications who find themselves courted by Ivy League universities.»

Caught between warring factions of her own family and under threat by the powerful lords of the English court, she must find a way to keep her infant son safe.

725 I.L.C.S. 5 / 112A -14 This Illinois law allows a court to issue an order of protection if the court finds that petitioner has been abused by a family or household member.

Because the Court of Appeals of New Mexico found that the Pielhaus» 2011 uninsured motorist claim was precluded by the family's 2004 lawsuit, the appeals court reversed the lower court's order and dismissed the Court of Appeals of New Mexico found that the Pielhaus» 2011 uninsured motorist claim was precluded by the family's 2004 lawsuit, the appeals court reversed the lower court's order and dismissed the court reversed the lower court's order and dismissed the court's order and dismissed the case.

With respect to issue number two, that the application judge erred in finding that an insurer was obligated to pay all expenses outlined in the Form 1, the Court agreed that with previous FSCO decisions that held that an insurer is permitted to request information to verify that an economic loss had been sustained by a family member providing care or other information or that the services provided were reasonable and necessary and found that the application judge did not rule in the contrary.

An order made by a circuit judge sitting in the county court that a fact finding hearing should be undertaken by a family proceedings court was set aside on six grounds including that a transfer down of a discrete part of proceedings could not be permitted (see Re C (a child)[2008] All ER (D) 168 (Apr)-RRB-.

The lawyer who gives advice in this area will find an array of legal and procedural principle — none of which is assisted by the inscrutable s 31F (6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (in operation in the new Family Court as of 22 April).

All were agreed that the appeal must be allowed with the result that, at the end of a process which started with allegations made in August 2014, and in included a substantial trial before a High Court Judge, any findings of fact made by the Judge and recorded in her oral determinations made in December 2016 and on 30 January 2017 must be set aside and must be disregarded in any future dealings with this family.

We recognize that threats of violence made by a defendant against his attorney or the attorney's family may constitute «extremely serious misconduct» that may justify a finding that an indigent defendant has forfeited his right to court - appointed counsel.

Bob Gore has joined the company subsequent to Veritext's acquisition of Gore Perry Reporting & Video, an institution in St. Louis court reporting founded in 1927 by the Gore family.

On the legal custody issue, the Court of Appeals agreed with my client that the family court erred in finding he did not have final decision - making authority under the previous order, finding that the old order «implicitly granted him final decision - making authority by virtue of granting him primary legal custody.&rCourt of Appeals agreed with my client that the family court erred in finding he did not have final decision - making authority under the previous order, finding that the old order «implicitly granted him final decision - making authority by virtue of granting him primary legal custody.&rcourt erred in finding he did not have final decision - making authority under the previous order, finding that the old order «implicitly granted him final decision - making authority by virtue of granting him primary legal custody.»

The appeal judge took the reasons of Butler J. into consideration, and found that there were not any new issues — everything that Mr. Gonzales brought up in the civil claim had already been decided during the family matter by the Supreme Court judge.

A majority of the Court found that the SIA might engage the right to security of the person under section 7 by «impeding the healing of Canadian victims of torture or their family members» (at para 143).

These modifications were requested by Wife and the family court found each of these modifications were in the child's best interests.

2013), the Court of Appeals reversed a family court's contempt finding that was based, in part, by the family court's determination that the mother was not credCourt of Appeals reversed a family court's contempt finding that was based, in part, by the family court's determination that the mother was not credcourt's contempt finding that was based, in part, by the family court's determination that the mother was not credcourt's determination that the mother was not credible.

The family court failed to address the factors required by the guidelines, and we simply can not find evidence in the record before us to support the court's imputation figure of $ 34,800.

In TeBaerts v. Penta Builders Group Inc., 2015 BCSC 2008, the B.C. Supreme Court awarded nearly $ 94,000 in damages to a 32 - year old project consultant and account manager after finding she was wrongfully dismissed by her employer, a family - run business.

This recent willingness of the Court of Appeals to reject a family court's credibility determinations should encourage appellate lawyers to challenge such determinations if evidence in the record demonstrates a lack of credibility by the party the family court found credible or demonstrates credibility by the party the family court found lacked credibiCourt of Appeals to reject a family court's credibility determinations should encourage appellate lawyers to challenge such determinations if evidence in the record demonstrates a lack of credibility by the party the family court found credible or demonstrates credibility by the party the family court found lacked credibicourt's credibility determinations should encourage appellate lawyers to challenge such determinations if evidence in the record demonstrates a lack of credibility by the party the family court found credible or demonstrates credibility by the party the family court found lacked credibicourt found credible or demonstrates credibility by the party the family court found lacked credibicourt found lacked credibility.

The only factual finding made by the family court is that «these sales were made in contemplation of marital litigation.»

At trial, the family court ordered Husband to effectuate its equitable distribution award by transferring seven properties to Wife, finding that Husband was the owner of these seven properties.

Our criminal defense attorney has been appointed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as a certified death penalty lawyer, and we have helped countless individuals and families find their footing again and move forward with their lives since our founding in 1996.

We find equity and fairness require the family court to carry the terms of the Final Decree into effect by requiring Husband, Son, and the LLC to join in the execution of the deeds to the subject properties to Wife.

She said of the case, which involved judges at an unnamed family court and social workers employed by an unnamed council: «It is difficult to view the justices as having been independent and impartial if, as happened here, they simply adopted the local authority's analysis of what their findings and reasons might comprise.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new permanency planning hearing and for the family court to make specific written findings to support its decision as required by subsection 63-7-1640 (F).

Families who have never been down this difficult road before often find themselves confused by the legal system and the courts.

There's been a number of recent cases in which one party treated inheritance as marital property, the other party kept his or her inheritance as separate property, and the family and appellate courts rewarded the ungenerous spouse's ungenerosity by finding only the generous spouse's inheritance as transmuted.

I also found it fascinating that the COA panel upheld the family court judge's right not to conduct a Rule 59 hearing at least, in part, because of the thoroughness of the Rule 59 motion filed by the husband's attorney:

Furthermore, in 99 % of the cases where the surcharge was waived in New Brunswick, reasons for the waiver were not provided by the court, and no documentation was found showing that the offender had demonstrated that paying the victim surcharge would cause undue hardship to the offender or his family.

«If, as all agree, it is essential in the public interest to provide a family justice system, and it can not be fully self - financing, should the cost be found from society at large or from a charge, essentially by way of taxation, on those who need to bring claims in the civil courts?»

The court found that the duty falls between the two positions requested by the parties, but that this change in hours reflected «a serious interference with a substantial parental or other family duty or obligation of the employee.»

Access to court would be available through the family services agency to address urgent, interim matters relating to wellbeing of family members and threats to the family's economic stability, but access would be provided on the process used in child protection matters in which the court confirms steps taken by child protection authorities unless those steps are found to be unreasonable.

59 Should that court find that, in the circumstances of the cases before it, such a denial does not follow from the refusals of residence permits at issue in the main proceedings, that would be without prejudice to the question whether, on the basis of other criteria, inter alia by virtue of the right to the protection of family life, Mr O and Mr M could not be refused a right of residence.

By Lisa Gelman The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently considered the question of when a court may or may not find that an order to arbitrate a family law dispute is enforceCourt of Justice recently considered the question of when a court may or may not find that an order to arbitrate a family law dispute is enforcecourt may or may not find that an order to arbitrate a family law dispute is enforceable.

On appeal, a divided Court of Appeal upheld the disqualification by finding there was no evidence of any intention to waive the privilege by the holder even in the face of several intermediate disclosures that had been made before McDermott had obtained the document from a family member who did not hold the privilege.

On 12 October 2017 the court of appeal found against Emirates Airline (Emirates) in joined claims brought by Miss Gahan and the Buckley family, ordering the carrier to pay compensation for delay under Regulation EC 261/2004 (EC261).

But while sharpening pikes for corporate clients in litigation may conjure certain romantic ideas of splattering the enemy's guts all about the ramparts, anyone familiar with the costs of family law disputes incurred by children likely finds it depressing how court - based dispute resolution wrecks such collateral damage, whether that is measured emotionally, physically or financially.

It is also interesting to note that research carried out by Dr Julia Brophy at Oxford University, Openness and Transparency in Family Courts: Messages from other Jurisdictions, found that in countries where there is more media access, such as Australia, there is no evidence of greater public understanding of the process.

The first US research to focus on the experiences of self - represented litigants in American family courts — conducted by IAALS at the University of Denver — has just released its preliminary findings.

The Court found that the four - hour restriction to Ray's visits with Ms. Brand's parents imposed by the trial judge unnecessary and contrary to his own finding on the bond between the son and Ms. Brand and her family, and not in the son's best interests.

When the court finds «some reasonable possibility of reconciliation,» the case may be transferred to a conciliation court or family service agencies, or other persons or agencies determined by the court to be qualified to provide conciliation services.