Sentences with phrase «found erector spinae muscle»

Not exact matches

At the end of the research, it was found out that there was increased muscle activation in the thoracic erector spinae.

Comparing free weight and machine squats, while some researchers have reported lower erector spinae muscle activity in the Smith machine squat than in the free weight back squat, with both the same absolute (Anderson and Behm, 2005) and relative (Fletcher and Bagley, 2014) loads, Schwanbeck et al. (2009) found no differences (using the same relative loads).

No other exercise has been found to involve greater quadriceps muscle activity than the back squat but the barbell hip thrust involves greater gluteus maximus activity and the deadlift involves greater erector spinae muscle activity.

Assessing the effects of cues, Bressel et al. (2009) found that conscious efforts to contract the abdominal muscles during squats did not affect the muscle activity of the erector spinae.

Erector spinae or spinal erectors are groups of muscles and tendons that can be found at the back of our body.

Andersen et al. (2005) similarly found that lower erector spinae muscle activity was similar in barbell back squats and smith machine squats with the same absolute load but they found superior muscle activity in the upper erector spinae in the barbell squat.

Noe et al. (1992) assessed erector spinae muscle activity during an isokinetic machine deadlift, and found that erector spinae muscle activity peaked at 83 % of lift height, which was after the point where peak force output was produced (67 % of lift).

Assessing the effect of bar velocity, Manabe et al. (2007) found that performing the back squat with quicker speeds with the same relative load increased erector spinae muscle activity when compared to slower speeds.

Comparing two different velocities using an isokinetic machine deadlift, Noe et al. (1992) found no differences in erector spinae muscle activity between two different bar speeds (45.7 vs. 30.5 cm / s).

Similarly, Andersen et al. (2014) compared the back squat and split squat with the same relative loads (6RM) and also found no difference in erector spinae muscle activity between conditions.

Reid et al. (1975) reported data from 28 individuals aged 52 — 54 years, and found that the erector spinae muscle volume was 843.46 cm3.

Similarly, Hamlyn et al. (2007) found that the back squat and deadlift performed with 80 % of 1RM produced superior erector spinae muscle activity compared to the side plank.