Simply put, the panel butchered the decision on
multiple fronts: (1) the freedom of expression issues related to 2 (b); (2) what constitutes a
breach of the University of Windsor's Human Rights Policy; and, (3)
finding that the three tweets directed at the student were uncivil rather than sexual harassment.
Attorneys for both plaintiffs and defendants will
find comprehensive coverage of such matters as: the advantages and disadvantages of suits based on strict liability, negligence and
breach of warranty; the use of state consumer protection statutes; the duty to warn and its innumerable ramifications; the liability of the manufacturers, retailers and other potential defendants in the distribution chain; successor liability; federal preemption of common law claims; monitoring product safety during design, manufacturing and distribution; causation theories in actions involving
multiple manufacturers; product misuse and alteration; the elements of proof needed in an action; recovery for economic loss; punitive damages; and the government contractor defense.